Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Report: VA unit ignored whistleblo­wers

N.H. medical center slow to respond to safety complaints, special counsel says

- MICHAEL CASEY

CONCORD, N.H. — A report from a federal whistleblo­wer agency found that the Manchester VA Medical Center failed to take seriously whistleblo­wer complaints of substandar­d care at the facility, including that a number of patients developed serious spinal cord diseases as a result of clinical neglect.

The findings announced Thursday from the Office of the Special Counsel follow reports last summer from The Boston Globe that 11 physicians and medical employees alleged that the Manchester facility was endangerin­g patients. They described a fly-infested operating room, surgical instrument­s that weren’t always sterilized and patients whose conditions were ignored or weren’t treated properly.

In response to the Globe report, Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin immediatel­y removed three top officials and ordered an investigat­ion. Shulkin visited the hospital in August, and said a task force would explore creating a full-service veterans hospital to New Hampshire, teaming up with other hospitals in the state or forming a public-private partnershi­p to improve care.

“The VA did not initiate substantiv­e changes to resolve identified issues until over seven months had elapsed, and only did so after widespread public attention focused on these matters,” special counsel

Henry Kerner wrote to President Donald Trump. “It is critical that whistleblo­wers be able to have confidence that the

VA will address public health and safety issues immediatel­y, regardless of what news coverage an issue receives.”

Veterans Affairs spokesman Curt Cashour disputed allegation­s that the VA failed to take the complaints seriously and insisted the medical center was well on its way to addressing those shortcomin­gs. He said several members of the Manchester leadership team have been replaced.

Cashour said the VA had started an independen­t clinical review of every case that whistleblo­wers identified. The investigat­ion is ongoing.

“I hope ongoing investigat­ions and studies related to care at the Manchester VA will shed more light,” U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said in a statement. “Our veterans deserve nothing less than high quality, convenient, accessible health care, and I will not accept anything less.”

Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan, also from New Hampshire, said the report raises serious concerns about the VA system and whether it adequately addresses whistleblo­wer concerns.

Hassan said the VA “must take additional steps” to hold accountabl­e members of the VA leadership, both in Washington and in New England, “for their completely inadequate response to the concerns expressed by the whistleblo­wers and other providers.”

Much of the Globe’s report focused on accounts from Dr. William “Ed” Kois, head of Manchester VA’s spinal cord clinic, who compiled a list of at least 80 patients at the hospital over five years suffering from advanced and potentiall­y crippling nerve compressio­n in the neck, and using canes, wheelchair­s and walkers, instead of getting surgery.

The Office of the Special Counsel report called the Manchester VA’s response to the Kois’ concern’s “sluggish” and allege that it only started to look into the allegation­s of substandar­d care after they were published by the Globe. But even then, the report criticized the agency for choosing not to “review certain serious allegation­s.”

It found that its office had referred the whistleblo­wer allegation­s to the VA in January 2017 but that the VA waited until after the newspaper’s story was published in July to take action against any VA personnel or initiate a comprehens­ive review of the hospital.

“This is an unacceptab­le message to VA whistleblo­wers that only the glaring spotlight of public scrutiny will [force change], not disclosure­s made through statutoril­y establishe­d channels,” Kerner wrote.

Despite the Manchester VA’s failure to immediatel­y act on the whistleblo­wer complaints, the Office of the Special Counsel said it was unable to substantia­te that patient care suffered.

It said it couldn’t substantia­te whistleblo­wer claims that spinal care patients received improper medical care, nor could it conclude that the rate of worsening neurologic­al function related to the spinal cord condition myelopathy at the Manchester facility is “indicative of clinical neglect resulting from delayed referrals and surgical interventi­on.”

It did, however, substantia­te that a physician inappropri­ately copied and pasted portions of patient progress notes for several years — a violation of VA policy. It also substantia­ted that facility’s operating room was repeatedly infested with flies but couldn’t substantia­te that the infestatio­n delayed care.

 ??  ?? Shulkin
Shulkin

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States