Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Hog farm applies for different permit

C&H submits documents in hopes of gaining 5-year operating license from state

- EMILY WALKENHORS­T

A Newton County hog farm is continuing its fight to keep operating near the Buffalo River.

C&H Hog Farms has submitted applicatio­n documents for a different type of operating permit, three months after another applicatio­n was turned down.

If all of the documents are submitted and the applicatio­n is approved by the Arkansas Department of Environmen­tal Quality, C&H Hog Farms would be able to continue operating under a five-year permit. The farm that houses 6,503 hogs is still operating under its expired permit while the owners appeal the department’s denial of their applicatio­n.

It was unclear Tuesday whether the hog farm had submitted its entire applicatio­n. Messages left at the Department of Environmen­tal Quality were not returned, and Jason Henson, a farm co-owner, and the other owners did not respond to messages seeking comment.

C&H Hog Farms has become a concern for environmen­tal groups that fear manure could leak into and pollute the Buffalo National River.

The farm is on Big Creek, about 6 miles from where it flows into the Buffalo River, which had about 1.5 million visitors last year. C&H was

the first and remains the only federally classified medium or large hog farm in the area.

Unlike the applicatio­n denied earlier this year, the farmers’ nutrient-management plan notes that it will maintain the number of hogs at 6,503 — 2,503 hogs of 55 pounds or more and 4,000 pigs of less than 55 pounds. Their denied applicatio­n proposed six boars of about 450 pounds apiece, 2,672 sows of at least 400 pounds each and 750 piglets of about 14 pounds each.

C&H is applying for a Regulation 6 individual permit, which is a wastewater discharge permit under federal regulation­s implemente­d by the Environmen­tal Quality Department.

It’s a different permit from the one the farm was originally permitted under, which was a Regulation 6 general permit, because conditions for individual permits are tailored to the facility and conditions for general ones assume what is appropriat­e based on similar facilities.

It’s also different from the permit C&H applied for in 2016, which was a Regulation 5 individual permit under state water regulation­s.

State water regulation­s are supposed to be at least as strict as federal regulation­s.

All other hog farms in Arkansas are permitted under Regulation 5. C&H cannot apply to renew its Regulation 6 general permit because the state chose to discontinu­e the permitting program.

The farmers prefer a Regulation 5 permit and would close their applicatio­n if they could get one, Henson wrote in an email that included the initial applicatio­n packet Thursday night.

The farmers are awaiting an August trial before the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission to see if they can obtain or begin the process to obtain a Regulation 5 permit.

Richard Mays, an attorney for intervenor­s who oppose C&H in the case, said Tuesday that he and his clients were unaware C&H had applied for a Regulation 6 permit.

“They’re trying to cover all their bases,” he said.

Mays said he thinks the department can require whatever it wants of C&H and that the facility would likely face the same obstacles.

The Environmen­tal Quality Department denied C&H Hog Farms an operating permit in part because the operation did not conduct a study on the flow direction of groundwate­r or develop an emergency action plan, according to the department’s responses to public comments on the permit applicatio­n.

The study and the plan were recommende­d by the Agricultur­al Waste Management Field Handbook, and the department determined they were necessary because of the rocky karst terrain upon which the farm sits.

The permit applicatio­n documents submitted Thursday do not appear to include an emergency action plan or a study on the groundwate­r, but it was unclear whether the documents filed at the department were the entirety of the applicatio­n.

Henson wrote in his email Thursday that he would send more documents but was unable to send them all at once because of the size of the files.

C&H has asked the Pollution Control and Ecology Commission to allow it to argue that the department improperly denied the Regulation 5 permit.

The department has filed a motion to dismiss, and the Buffalo River Watershed Alliance and the Ozark Society have intervened.

In the applicatio­n, the farmers said the operation generates about 2 million gallons of wastewater annually.

C&H has 630.7 acres to which it can apply the manure as fertilizer, they wrote.

The facility would have a holding pond that could contain nearly 2.4 million gallons of manure and a shallow pit that could contain nearly 800,000 gallons.

The applicatio­n also includes numerous land-use contracts for potential applicatio­n of manure and setback requiremen­t waivers to apply manure up to neighbors’ property lines.

C&H’s operators also have explored expanding their hog production in Johnson County.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States