Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. renews threat of tariffs on China

Move seen as nod to lawmakers, attempt to gain advantage in talks

- Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Christophe­r Rugaber, Jill Colvin and Ken Thomas of The Associated Press; by Ana Swanson of The New York Times; and by Jenny Leonard and Andrew Mayeda of Bloomberg News.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s administra­tion on Tuesday renewed its threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese goods in retaliatio­n for what it says are China’s unfair trade practices.

The White House also said it would place new restrictio­ns on Chinese investment into the United States and limit U.S. exports of high-tech goods to China.

The announceme­nts came just over a week after trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies had seemingly eased. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said May 20 that the trade conflict was “on hold.” Mnuchin’s comments followed a commitment by China to significan­tly increase its purchases of U.S. farm goods and energy products, such as natural gas.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is scheduled to visit China on Saturday to negotiate the details of that agreeThe

ment. Some trade experts said the tariff announceme­nt is likely intended to strengthen Ross’ hand.

Other analysts, however, say the newly confrontat­ional stance may be intended to appease congressio­nal critics of a deal the Trump administra­tion made Friday that allowed Chinese telecom giant ZTE Corp. to stay in business. The tariff threat is unlikely to derail ongoing talks, they said.

“This is really about Congress,” said Derek Scissors, a China specialist at the conservati­ve American Enterprise Institute. “I don’t think it blows up a deal with the Chinese.”

Top Senate Democrat Charles Schumer of New York applauded the Tuesday announceme­nt and urged the president not to waver from his plan. “While obviously more details are needed, this outline represents the kind of actions we have needed to take for a long time, but the president must stick with it and not bargain it away,” he said.

China’s Ministry of Commerce responded in a mild fashion. The Ministry said the White House’s announceme­nt “is contrary to the consensus the two sides have previously reached,” according to China’s official news agency, Xinhua. The statement did not reiterate China’s own previous plan to impose $50 billion in retaliator­y tariffs on U.S. goods.

The U.S. tariffs threat has been widely opposed by industry leaders and some members of Congress who warn the duties could end

up raising costs for American consumers, devastatin­g farmers and hurting other exporters if China proceeds with retaliator­y duties.

“Conflictin­g messages coming from the administra­tion is causing whiplash for American companies that are focused on growing the economy and creating jobs here at home,” the Virginia-based Retail Industry Leaders Associatio­n said in an emailed statement. “We support the administra­tion’s decision to hold China accountabl­e for their bad behavior. But retailers strongly believe igniting a global trade war will cause casualties.”

U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue, in an emailed statement, said, “We continue to believe that the use of tariffs puts all the burden on American companies and consumers.”

Members of both parties in the House and Senate slammed the agreement the Trump administra­tion reached with ZTE Friday, in which the Chinese firm agreed to remove its management team, hire American compliance officers, and pay a fine. The fine would be on top of a $1 billion penalty ZTE has already paid for selling high-tech equipment to North Korea and Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions.

In return, the Commerce Department lifted a seven-year ban on ZTE’s purchase of U.S. components that it had imposed earlier in May. China had complained that the ban would put ZTE out of business, costing 70,000 jobs. Trump tweeted this month that the ban threatened too many Chinese jobs and he wanted to get the company

“back in business, fast.”

Republican and Democratic senators criticized the deal as insufficie­nt punishment for a company that defied U.S. sanctions policy.

The White House said Tuesday that it will focus the tariffs on cutting-edge technologi­es, including those that China has said it wants to dominate as part of its “Made in China 2025” program. Under that program, China aims to take a leading role in areas such as artificial intelligen­ce, robotics, and electric cars.

The list of imports subject to the duties will be announced by June 15, the White House said, and the tariffs will be imposed “shortly thereafter.” The list will be based on a previous compilatio­n of 1,300 goods released in April that will be narrowed based on public comments the administra­tion has received. The list includes computer equipment, aerospace parts, medical devices and industrial machinery.

“If Beijing was under the impression that Trump’s $50 billion of tariffs were actually on hold, they may find this confusing,” said Chad Bown, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for Internatio­nal Economics. “It could very well complicate Wilbur Ross’ visit.”

Trump has bemoaned the U.S. trade deficit with China — $337 billion last year — as evidence that China has been complicit in abusive trading practices. The White House, and many American companies, say that China forces U.S. firms to turn over technology as part of joint ventures with Chinese companies to gain access to its market. China also subsidizes many favored industries.

Trump has frequently focused on the trade deficit, urging China to increase its imports and lower the gap by $200 billion, while China has refused to agree to any dollar amounts.

Many experts and U.S. companies, however, warn that China’s efforts to protect its high-tech industries and capture U.S. technology represent the larger threat.

Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies, said that many foreign leaders are learning to not overreact to Trump’s threats, which are frequently seen as just part of negotiatin­g strategy. That’s good for global stability, he added.

“But that means the United States’ credibilit­y is incredibly low,” he said. “I don’t think you can keep doing about-faces, and have everyone pretend the threat is as ominous as it was before.”

An unnamed spokesman for the Chinese Commerce Ministry said in the statement released by Xinhua that officials were “surprised by the tactical statement issued by the White House, and yet it was also unsurprisi­ng.

“No matter what measures the U.S. side unveils, China has the confidence, the capacity and the experience to defend the interests of the Chinese people and core national interests. China urges the United States to move toward each other in the spirit of the joint announceme­nt.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States