Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Project worries transit agency

Can’t afford to move LR streetcar poles, it tells state

- NOEL OMAN

The latest version of the $631.7 million 30 Crossing project will require Rock Region Metro to relocate 15 catenary poles used on its downtown streetcar system, mostly along a section of East Second Street in Little Rock.

The cost to relocate the poles and replace and restring the related catenary wire is an estimated $455,000, a sum Rock Region’s interim executive director said the transit agency cannot afford.

“This is a huge financial burden for METRO, which is severely limited by its funding structure when it comes to reserving funding for unexpected, one-time projects such as this,” Wanda Crawford said in a letter to the Arkansas Department of Transporta­tion that was dated April 10 but which was released last week.

In the letter that addressed a range of concerns Rock Region has with the project, Crawford formally asked the department to provide the money to relocate the 15 catenary poles, replacing and re-stringing the catenary wire and the associated engineerin­g and design services.

Citing a 2004 right-of-way agreement between the two agencies, the Department of Transporta­tion maintains that it isn’t responsibl­e for paying for the work.

The catenary poles hold up the overhead lines used

to transmit the electricit­y to power the trolleys over the tracks along a 3.4-mile route in downtown Little Rock and North Little Rock.

A final design of the project to upgrade the Interstate 30 corridor through downtown Little Rock and North Little Rock isn’t available yet, according to state highway officials.

“The number of catenary guide poles impacted has really yet to be determined,” said Danny Straessle, department spokesman.

Crawford said she was working on assumption­s presented at a March 14 meeting between Rock Region and department officials.

At the time, department officials said Second, which is a two-lane street, would be reconfigur­ed into a twoway street with four lanes on a two-block section between River Market Avenue and South Cumberland Street. At South Cumberland, Second will become one-way again.

Although Second belongs to the city, the portion that is affected by the project is in the transporta­tion department’s right of way associated with Interstate 30. Right of way is the right to make a way over a piece of land. The right of way typically extends beyond the actual roadway. Federal regulation­s allow states to create a safety zone to ensure there is no interferen­ce with using the property for transporta­tion.

For its part, the department said it will follow the policy it has in place for all entities that use its right of way, which are typically utilities. The utilities can locate their equipment, such as pipes, cable and wires, in the department’s right of way at no cost. But they are required to pay to relocate the equipment in the event the department needs the right of way.

The department’s response to Rock Region’s request came in a June 7 letter from Scott Bennett, the department’s director. The letter included a 2004 agreement between the department and Rock Region, then known as the Central Arkansas Transit Authority, allowing the transit agency to build, maintain and operate the streetcar system on department right of way.

Among other restrictio­ns, the agreement said the transit agency “agrees to occupy and use the Commission’s rights of way solely at its own risk and expense.”

In another section, Rock Region agreed to “be solely and exclusivel­y responsibl­e for payment of all cost of the initial and subsequent constructi­on, maintenanc­e, repair, operation, or modificati­on of the Project, including any modificati­ons or repairs to the improvemen­t on the Commission’s property.”

“This permit states that Rock Region Metro is responsibl­e for all costs associated with the relocation of their facilities on [Arkansas Highway] Commission right of way,” Bennett wrote. “This responsibi­lity is consistent with the permits that the department enters into with other parties [such as utility companies] who choose to place their facilities on commission right of way.”

But a list of specific rights of way locations in the 2004 agreement didn’t include the section of East Second in question. The department later provided a copy of a similar 2002 agreement. Although that agreement addresses the transit agency’s use of the Main Street bridge over the Arkansas River between Little Rock and North Little Rock, an exhibit attached to the agreement specifical­ly refers to the department’s right of way on East Second.

The agency also provided a map showing the right of way for Interstate 30, which included the two-block section of East Second.

“Those poles are clearly in the right of way,” Straessle said.

At Tuesday’s monthly meeting of the Rock Region Metro board of directors, where copies of her letter was included in the board’s meeting documents, Crawford said she would reserve discussion of the department’s response

for next month’s board meeting.

By then, the transit agency’s new boss, Charles Frazier, will be on board. Frazier, a former executive at a Florida transit agency, was hired in May. He replaces Jarod Varner, who led the agency for four years before his departure last August.

This is the second time that Rock Region Metro’s streetcar system has faced potential impact from the 30 Crossing project.

Three years ago, a proposed design of an interchang­e on I-30 to funnel traffic safely in and out of downtown Little Rock wouldn’t have been able to accommodat­e the streetcar route serving the Clinton Presidenti­al Center and the Heifer Internatio­nal headquarte­rs. The route would have to have been relocated or removed or the interchang­e modified.

In the end, the department came up with another design.

The Metro streetcar system has been operating for 14 years. Its first phase opened in 2004. A second phase that took trolley service to the Clinton Presidenti­al Center opened in 2007.

Civic leaders have said the trolleys have helped spurred revitaliza­tion in downtown and fostered economic developmen­t. They often are featured in materials promoting the area.

A promotion offering free fares to ride the trolley boosted ridership last summer. But the promotion ended and Rock Region’s partners — mainly the cities of Little Rock and North Little Rock and Pulaski County, which provided more than $13 million of the agency’s $18 million annual operating budget — declined to provide the extra funding needed to continue the promotion.

As a result, ridership on the trolleys have declined. More than 15,000 people rode the streetcars through the first five months of the year, a nearly 28 percent decline from the same period a year ago when more than 21,000 rode the streetcars.

Rock Region has said it will pay for a study to look at the future of the streetcar system, including possible ways to expand it.

The dispute over the right of way comes during a 45-day public review of an environmen­tal assessment of the 30 Crossing project. It includes what is called a location-and-design public hearing. Jointly sponsored by the department, the Federal

Highway Administra­tion and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the hearing will be held from 4 to 7 p.m. on July 12 in the Silver City rooms of the Wyndham Riverfront Hotel at 2 Riverfront Place in downtown North Little Rock.

The project is the single largest one the department has ever undertaken.

The preferred plan would widen the 6.7-mile corridor from Interstate 530 in Little Rock to Interstate 40 in North Little Rock to 10 lanes from six and replace the bridge over the Arkansas River.

Central Arkansas planners had long called for an overhaul of the congested corridor, which features the convergenc­e of six major highways in the space of fewer than 7 miles. The I-30 bridge over the Arkansas River, which dates to the late 1950s and was built at a cost of $5.5 million, carries 124,000 vehicles daily.

The latest design for the 10-lane alternativ­e features four lanes that would be more

like city streets, with ramps to lower speeds, narrower lanes, traffic signals and other features that will, officials say, allow traffic moving on or off I-30 to safely interact with pedestrian­s and other non-interstate traffic.

The 10-lane alternativ­e has been referred to as a mix of six main through lanes with four collector-distributo­r lanes. The latter are separated by a wall from the main lanes, have slower speeds and allow traffic traveling between Little Rock and North Little Rock to cross the bridge without entering the main interstate lanes.

The project also includes improvemen­ts to the section of I-40 between MacArthur Drive and U.S. 67/167 in North Little Rock and a new interchang­e in Little Rock to replace the one at Cantrell Road and I-30. Removal of the Cantrell/I-30 interchang­e would create what city officials envision as a 17-acre park.

 ?? Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/THOMAS METTHE ?? The River Rail Trolley cruisesdow­n East Second Street in Little Rock on Friday. About a dozen streetcar poles, mostly along East Second Street, will need to be removed and replaced as part of the Arkansas Department of Transporta­tion’s 30 Crossing project. Rock Region Metro has estimated the cost at $450,000.
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/THOMAS METTHE The River Rail Trolley cruisesdow­n East Second Street in Little Rock on Friday. About a dozen streetcar poles, mostly along East Second Street, will need to be removed and replaced as part of the Arkansas Department of Transporta­tion’s 30 Crossing project. Rock Region Metro has estimated the cost at $450,000.
 ??  ?? Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States