Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

463 adults deported separately from kids

U.S. revises total from previous 12

-

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s administra­tion told a federal court Tuesday that more than 450 migrant parents whose children were separated from them are no longer in the United States, raising questions about whether the parents fully understood that they were being deported without their children.

The parents — nearly one-fifth of the 2,551 migrants whose children were taken from them after crossing the southwest border — were either swiftly de- ported or somehow left the country without their children, government lawyers said.

The exact number, 463, is still “under review,” the lawyers added, and could change. However, the disclosure was the first time the government has acknowledg­ed that hundreds of families face formidable barriers of bureaucrac­y and distance that were unforeseen in the early stages of the government’s zero-tol-

erance policy on border enforcemen­t.

The government’s previous estimate of the number of such cases was just 12, though that applied only to parents of the youngest children.

“We are extremely worried that a large percentage of parents may already have been removed without their children,” said Lee Gelernt, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union. He said further clarificat­ion is needed to understand just what has happened.

Facing a court-ordered deadline of Thursday, federal agencies must reunite more than 1,500 parents with their children within about 48 hours. Those parents are just a portion of the total number who were separated: those who have been deemed eligible after a background check and a confirmati­on of where they are in the United States or abroad.

Returning children even to eligible parents has been messy and has revealed challenges facing the government as it complies with the judicial order. For example, reunificat­ions at the Port Isabel detention center in south Texas screeched to a halt Sunday after the center was locked down for five hours, according to Carlos Garcia, an immigratio­n lawyer who was prevented from entering the building to meet with his clients. The lockdown resulted from an accidental miscountin­g of detainees there, Garcia said.

It was only the latest hiccup at Port Isabel, where parents, children and their advocates have had to wait for hours, or even days, for reunificat­ion.

The hurdles that remain in the reunificat­ion process were discussed at a status hearing Tuesday, where little more was explained about the number of parents who appear to have left or have been sent out of the country without their children.

The judge who ordered the reunificat­ions, Dana Sabraw of U.S. District Court in San Diego, called the situation the “unfortunat­e” result of a policy that was introduced “without forethough­t to reunificat­ion or keeping track of people.”

Some migrant advocates said many of the parents had agreed to be deported quickly, believing that doing so would speed up reunificat­ion — and perhaps not understand­ing that they would be leaving their children behind.

“We are aware of instances in which parents have felt coerced and didn’t fully understand the consequenc­es of signing or did not feel they had a choice in the matter,”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States