Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Bush pressed for Kavanaugh records

- SEUNG MIN KIM

WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., is escalating a dispute over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s records, pressing former President George W. Bush directly to release all the documents from the nominee’s five years in the White House.

In a letter released Friday, Schumer writes to Bush with a “time-sensitive” request: to make public all of Kavanaugh’s paperwork, including from his three years as Bush’s staff secretary, a period when Kavanaugh controlled all the documents that flowed to and from the Oval Office.

Senate Republican­s have pushed back against the Democrats’ demand, calling it a delaying tactic and arguing that staff secretary papers would give no insight into how Kavanaugh — President Donald Trump’s pick to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy — would act as a judge. But Schumer is now pushing Bush, arguing that releasing all the nominee’s records is “consistent with your commitment to transparen­cy and is strongly in the public interest.”

“While the country may be divided on whether Judge Kavanaugh should join the Supreme Court, there ought to be no disagreeme­nt on whether the process that leads to a confirmati­on vote should be a fair and impartial one,” Schumer writes to Bush in the two-page letter, obtained by The Washington Post in advance of its release.

In the letter, Schumer also raises concerns about what he deemed an “irregular” approach to dealing with Kavanaugh’s records — which are voluminous and could top 1 million pages, according to estimates from both Democratic and GOP senators.

Schumer says Senate Republican­s plan to ask for what Schumer called a “prescreene­d subset” of Kavanaugh’s White House counsel records that will be vetted by Bush’s legal team, which Schumer argued could potentiall­y exclude the National Archives from the screening process. Republican­s dispute that the archives will be excluded.

“I understand that you have a right to review your administra­tion’s documents before they are released, and there is nothing wrong with that,” Schumer wrote to Bush. “My concern is that the Archivist of the United States, who is responsibl­e for guiding the review and release of responsive documents, would be cut out of this new process being contemplat­ed by Senate Republican­s.”

The National Archives, in a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., dated Thursday and also obtained by The Washington Post, confirms that the Archives has already provided copies of some of the Kavanaugh-related records to Bush representa­tives. The Presidenti­al Records Act allows a former president or his aides special access to the papers, which usually remain private until 12 years after he leaves office.

Bush has asked for access to Kavanaugh’s records in advance of a formal request from the Senate Judiciary Committee so he can get a “jump-start” on going through the nominee’s significan­t paper trail, according to a person familiar with the review process. Presidents review the paperwork to determine if any should be deemed privileged and should not be released.

The National Archives will have ample input, Republican­s say, because any document deemed not a presidenti­al record by Bush’s legal team would be sent back to the Archives to be verified.

“After Sen. Schumer’s bizarre and inaccurate interventi­on, we can now add fabricatio­n to the fearmonger­ing and deception that Democrat leaders are deploying to smear a well-qualified nominee to the Supreme Court and obstruct the vetting process,” said Taylor Foy, a spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa. “In the end, none of this changes that fact that Judge Kavanaugh’s significan­t record on the D.C. Circuit demonstrat­es his fitness for the high court.”

So far, the archives has not received a direct request from the Senate for Kavanaugh’s documents because Grassley wants Feinstein to sign off on a request that asks for Kavanaugh’s documents from his time in the White House Counsel’s Office — which Republican­s agree are fair game — but not his staff secretary records. Democrats say that is insufficie­nt and that all his papers should be released.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States