Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Watchdogs’ bias

- Mike Masterson Mike Masterson is a longtime Arkansas journalist. Email him at mmasterson@arkansason­line.com.

It’s troubled me for years that our Department of Environmen­tal Quality (cough) relies on the Big Creek Research and Extension Team, with an obvious agricultur­al bent toward protecting C&H Hog Farms, to authentica­te any contaminat­ion leaking from that facility into adjacent Big Creek.

Dr. Andrew Sharpley with two team members-to-be, including the extension agent for Newton County, were working with the C&H owners in their capacity with the University of Arkansas extension service before former Gov. Mike Beebe formed that team from within the university’s Division of Agricultur­e.

When the university accepted that watchdog responsibi­lity to document and prevent harmful effects to our Buffalo National River, Sharpley became its chairman. At the time they were called the Big Creek Research Team. The agricultur­al term “extension” was later added reportedly at the suggestion of a university extension service employee.

For me and others, the team’s focus on agricultur­e rather than environmen­tal sciences represents a conflict of interest that has shaken trust in anything it reports, or doesn’t. Sharpley has been grilled about his biases in a deposition where he denied any conflict of interest.

I was especially troubled by his actions in initially failing to readily disclose to the Department of Environmen­tal Quality the results of Dr. Todd Halihan’s 2015 electrical resistivit­y imaging tests, which revealed an apparent subsurface fracture beside one of the factory’s waste containmen­t ponds.

I’m also bothered by the failure to acknowledg­e increasing levels of fertilizer-generated nutrients found in the Buffalo tributary Big Creek until the mess became bad enough to deem the creek impaired.

This and more indicates an unacceptab­le agenda to assist and protect C&H rather than as an impartial watchdog over the Buffalo, portions of which also are now officially contaminat­ed.

And because of the state agency’s politicall­y efficient draft 4(b) category of these impairment­s, the department is not required to discover why. Being listed 4(b) means it need not determine the source of low dissolved-oxygen levels and the river’s massive algae overgrowth containing pathogens, some harmful to humans.

Adding to the politicize­d aspects of such failure to protect both Ozark streams, the governor has appointed two members to the state’s Pollution Control and Ecology Commission who are openly supportive of the mislocated factory with 6,500 waste-generating hogs.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson appointed Commission­er Mike Freeze in February, even after Freeze had sent two letters to the Department of Environmen­tal Quality avidly supporting C&H. He is a fish farmer and a paid member of the Farm Bureau’s State Board of Directors that also contribute­s to C&H’s legal team.

Because of his obvious conflict, Freeze was asked last week to recuse from voting in the commission’s review of a finding by Administra­tive Law Judge Charles Moulton. Moulton recommende­d denying a motion by C&H attorneys seeking to allow the factory’s original discontinu­ed operating permit to remain active indefinite­ly. Freeze said he refused to recuse because he supposedly knows more than when he was appointed in February and therefore could be impartial (cough).

Then commission­ers voted 8-3 to approve Moulton’s recommende­d denial.

The other commission­er I believe clearly supports the factory in its present location is Bruce Holland, a former legislator and cattleman, who also directs the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission. His deputy director, Ryan Benefield, was the Department of Environmen­tal Quality’s assistant director when that department approved the factory’s original 2012 permit. Holland’s position matters because his commission is among the groups supposedly assigned to monitor Big Creek.

Freeze and Holland voted against Moulton’s recommenda­tion that determined C&H’s coverage under its original Regulation 6 general permit had indeed ended in January when its applicatio­n for the Regulation 5 permit was denied.

C&H lawyers had argued to commission­ers that the factory’s original general permit coverage should continue indefinite­ly anyway until being replaced by a Regulation 6 individual permit.

To swallow that illogical argument, one would have to agree the factory’s Regulation 5 permit applicatio­n (and resulting process requiring almost two years to process before being denied) was an exercise in futility. The judge’s recommenda­tion was approved despite Holland’s and Freeze’s no votes, along with that of retired farmer Rusty Moss of Dermott.

The argument in favor of continuing C&H’s general permit coverage until it is replaced by an indefinite individual permit was in this instance ludicrous, as Moulton’s opinion more politely pointed out.

And the willingnes­s of Holland, Freeze and Moss (none lawyers) to vote against Moulton’s reasoned findings I believe spoke volumes about any self-proclaimed greater knowledge and impartiali­ty.

In light of such obvious bias among some commission­ers responsibl­e for policing pollution and enhancing ecology (not assisting agricultur­e), I’m hoping our governor will embrace fairness and balance by appointing commission­ers from the Buffalo River Watershed Alliance and the Sierra Club.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States