Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Two agencies locked horns on emissions rules, files show

- JENNIFER A. DLOUHY AND RYAN BEENE

The Trump administra­tion’s environmen­tal protection and transporta­tion safety agencies sparred for months over plans to ease vehicle efficiency and emissions standards, debating whether it would actually save lives and money.

The joint proposal from the Environmen­tal Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion, unveiled earlier this month, calls for rolling back increases in fuel economy requiremen­ts put in place while President Barack Obama was in office.

In announcing the proposal it calls the “Safer and Affordable Fuel Efficient Vehicles Rule,” the Trump administra­tion estimated that the changes would save roughly 1,000 lives a year because less stringent regulation­s would keep the cost of cars lower and more people could buy new, safer models.

Documents released Tuesday showed EPA officials repeatedly questioned assumption­s in the traffic safety administra­tion’s draft of the plan submitted for White House review in late May and disputed the supporting analyses as the two agencies negotiated a final rule.

In a June email, senior EPA staff members told the Office of Management and Budget — the White House office charged with evaluating regulatory changes — that the mileage freeze would slightly increase highway deaths, by 17 annually.

The “proposed standards are detrimenta­l to safety, rather than beneficial,” William Charmley, director of the assessment­s and standards division of the EPA’s office of transporta­tion and air quality, said in a June 18 interagenc­y email, released Tuesday.

In the comments, the EPA said the safety agency’s model overestima­ted the number of older, less-safe cars that would remain on the road if drivers didn’t buy new cars due to higher prices caused by the Obama-era standards, which had the effect of inflating projected traffic deaths.

In July, the safety agency fired back, countering that EPA’s correction­s assumed the size of the U.S. vehicle fleet and the number of miles driven would remain constant, rather than changing because of the fuel economy standards — an outcome the agency said “would be much more reasonable to expect.”

The ultimate proposal released by the agencies this month calls for suspending Obama-era planned increases in auto fuel economy requiremen­ts after 2020 so they remain at a fleet average of 37 miles per gallon. The levels are currently scheduled to increase steadily to reach 47 mpg by 2025.

Representa­tives from traffic safety administra­tion and the Transporta­tion Department did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment.

Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Ellen Knickmeyer of The Associated Press.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States