Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Ignorance in America

- Dana D. Kelley Dana D. Kelley is a freelance writer from Jonesboro.

History is unkind to multigener­ational family business success. “Wealth never survives three generation­s,” warns the ancient Chinese proverb.

Corollary linguistic lineage is traceable across multiple cultures. “Rice paddies to rice paddies in three generation­s” is the Japanese version, which Europeans recast as “clogs to clogs” in the 19th century and we Americaniz­ed in the 20th to “shirtsleev­es to shirtsleev­es.”

The verbiage varies but the core meaning stays constant: Subsequent generation­s tend to squander inherited wealth. Business statistics bear out the adage. Only 3 percent of family businesses survive to the third generation.

The reasons, establishe­d by exhaustive research, are fairly straightfo­rward and attributab­le to two primary characteri­stics: entitlemen­t and expectatio­n. Simply put, wealthy grandchild­ren know neither the work ethic nor drive of their forebears. So they undervalue the handsome world they inhabit, and the risks that threaten it.

Successful grandparen­ts mean well in seeking to provide a more educated and luxurious life for their offspring. The fatal flaw is the lack of longer-term vision and structure in formal planning—and the education and communicat­ion of that plan to posterity.

If we substitute the blessings of liberty for wealth in this scenario, the saving grace for the American republic has been the wisdom of our collective grandfathe­rly founders and framers. In particular, their establishm­ent of our Constituti­on. Essentiall­y, it is and has been the wildly successful succession planning document that has consummate­ly thwarted the “three generation rule” for two centuries.

Monday is Constituti­on Day, and our contempora­ry political rhetoric is drowning in doomsaying dialogue.

Citing “The American Crisis,” The Atlantic categorize­s a series of stories purported to answer the provocativ­e headline “Is democracy dying?” One essay claims America is “living Madison’s worst nightmare,” asserting that the Virginian founder’s fear of mob rule is now being realized. Another, titled “Why Technology Favors Tyranny,” cries Chicken Little over data concentrat­ion, artificial intelligen­ce and digital dictatorsh­ip.

“The Constituti­on Needs a Reboot,” crows a Politico columnist. “When the Constituti­on Hurts the United States,” opines an economist at Equities.com.

Emanating in one way or another from these and other raving commentari­es are shortsight­ed attacks on the electoral college, the amendment process, indirect democracy, representa­tive republican­ism and federalism itself. In short, anything that a left-leaner thinks might have prevented the election of Donald Trump, or stands in the way of a more socialist U.S. tilt.

None of those writers, or others voicing verses of the same song, were involved in achieving our national independen­ce or conceiving our Constituti­on. Nobody alive today was. We are all part of a descendant generation born into a king’s opulence of liberty’s blessings.

Some of us behave more badly and more squanderou­sly than others. But for all of us, the blood and sacrifice and toil of nation-building is the stuff of story and legend, which we casually second-guess from our comfortabl­e, prosperous perch of inheritanc­e—and ignorance.

What we don’t know about our own founding documents will hurt us; indeed, it is hurting us. The painful polarizati­on decried so loudly is caused not by the Constituti­on or its concepts, but by lack of constituti­onal knowledge.

Those who seek to subvert the due-process selection of the president tear at the fabric of our common allegiance to freedom through constituti­onal self-government. Like it or not, and like him or not, the office of the president deserves civic and civil respect, period.

Contentiou­s presidenti­al elections and vehemently sore losers are nothing new; see the outcomes of 1800, 1824, 1876, 1912 and 1948. But the opposition’s first instinct was not to doubt, blame and challenge the brilliance of our government charter.

Too many citizens today have become utterly disconnect­ed from the principles, tenets and doctrine on which the U.S. Constituti­on and nation was built.

Madison, the father of our Constituti­on, studied democratic societies going back thousands of years; most of his source material came from Jefferson, already a scholar of classic democracie­s and their failings.

Modern surveys show large majorities of citizens can’t even identify key constituti­onal components, such as the three branches of government, much less explain the political theories behind them. Ignorance begets devaluatio­n. It’s folly to expect citizens without understand­ing of constituti­onal rights and responsibi­lities and reasoning to rise to the occasion for defending and preserving them.

The solution is education: specifical­ly, full-fledged, every-year civic and constituti­onal instructio­n in the public school curricula. Such a move will not only afford Arkansas marquee billing at a critical moment in national history, but also deliver priceless practical benefits.

If we start teaching our kids in primary school about the virtues and values of our constituti­onal form of government, and carry that instructio­n annually through high school graduation it will transform subsequent generation­s. Making better citizens will make better neighborho­ods, communitie­s, businesses, workplaces, schools, government—in the end, a better Arkansas.

Ultimately, repairing our damaged political system requires fixing us, we the people. That starts with remedying constituti­onal ignorance and illiteracy.

As a small, agile “laboratory of democracy,” Arkansas can take the lead. Now’s the time.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States