Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Terps fans split on who should stay, go

- PETER SCHMUCK

COLLEGE PARK, Md. — The Maryland football team took the field Saturday afternoon under threatenin­g skies, which seemed appropriat­e for a team and a fan base still waiting for something to chase away the dark cloud hanging over the university and its athletic department.

The long-awaited independen­t report on the football program’s allegedly “toxic” culture that was leaked to the media Thursday stopped short of using that term, but acknowledg­ed serious dysfunctio­n throughout the athletic department.

What the eight-person commission did not do was settle the question of who should be held responsibl­e for that, perhaps reflecting the same variety of opinion on the subject displayed by fans who showed up to see the Terps defeat Illinois on Saturday at Maryland Stadium to keep their bowl hopes alive.

If there is unanimity among the fans on anything, it would appear to be the desire for the University System of Maryland’s Board of Regents to do the rest of its due diligence and do it quickly. The program has been shrouded in uncertaint­y for five months since the tragic death of Jordan McNair from heatstroke and there are just a few weeks remaining in the football season.

“I think getting on with it would be nice,” said Wayne Wiley of Denton.

“I feel like they’re handling it. They’re taking it seriously. At this point, there are changes that have to be made. I don’t see how they can go back to where they were.”

Much of the attention has been focused on the future of football Coach DJ Durkin, who remains on administra­tive leave while interim coach Matt Canada runs the team. But the job security of both Athletic Director Damon Evans and university President Wallace Loh also remains in doubt.

“From what I’ve read, I think Loh has completely mishandled it,” said Durkin supporter Ralph Roberts of Urbana. “I think it would be a shame to get cut loose because somebody wrote an article on ESPN without any facts. That was a one-sided article from the very beginning.”

Still, the two investigat­ions that were initiated by the university outlined serious problems with the way the training staff handled McNair’s care and with what the second report described as an overall lack of accountabi­lity throughout the athletic department.

Durkin’s future at Maryland probably depends on whether the Board of Regents expects the coach of its cornerston­e college football program to be responsibl­e for whatever happens on his watch or accepts his contention that he was not responsibl­e for supervisin­g former strength and conditioni­ng coach Rick Court, whose alleged bullying of players was a major component of the ESPN expose.

Tim Brandt, the parent of a University of Maryland student, seemed surprised that Durkin would abdicate that responsibi­lity.

“The bottom line is, as the head coach of a major college football program, you pretty much have your finger on everything that’s going on,” Brandt said. “You know what your coaches are up to, how they’re treating players and just what’s going on.

“When you’re sitting across from his parents, you’re telling them how you’re the head coach and you’re going to take care of this kid while recruiting him. For that alone, no matter how you claim you didn’t know what was going on and you didn’t have an idea that this treatment was taking place. I’ve got to say, just for that alone, I’m sorry DJ, you’ve gotta go, man.”

Some fans aren’t as interested in who stays or who goes as they are in how seriously the university takes its responsibi­lity to protect the health and safety of its students going forward.

“I’m not an expert in the field,” said Mary Dell Jackson, another university parent, “but I do think that the university needs to do something and they’ve gone a little bit of the way by acknowledg­ing that they need to have adequate medical care for all sports for all practices. That’s huge.”

If the main problem is inadequate supervisio­n of football, it might be difficult to separate Durkin and Evans, who both were responsibl­e for direct oversight of the program over the two years leading up to the McNair tragedy.

“The report came back that it wasn’t a toxic culture, but we do have problems,” Roberts said. “I agree with that and they should be fixed. I don’t know enough about Evans. It seems to be he was supposed to be in charge of the football program as assistant AD. If they let Durkin go, I don’t see how they can keep him.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States