Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Filing raises census-data access for lawmen

Discussion emerges in challenge to citizenshi­p question placed on 2020 survey

- TARA BAHRAMPOUR

WASHINGTON — Officials in President Donald Trump’s administra­tion have privately discussed the possibilit­y that in the future census informatio­n could be shared with law enforcemen­t, according to documents filed in a legal challenge over plans for a new citizenshi­p question on the 2020 survey.

The subject came up after a Democratic lawmaker asked whether responses to the survey could ever be shared with law enforcemen­t agencies, something that has been strictly illegal according to federal law governing the census.

After a congressio­nal hearing in May about the citizenshi­p question, Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., submitted a written query about whether the Justice Department agreed with a memo it had issued in 2010 saying the Patriot Act could not override the confidenti­ality of the Census.

In a June 12 email, department officials discussed among themselves how to answer Gomez’s question in a way that left the answer open. Justice Department attorney Ben Aguinaga suggested to acting assistant attorney general John Gore that they not say “too much” in response to Gomez’s question, in case the issue were to “come up later for renewed debate.”

Confidenti­ality is considered a fundamenta­l premise of the census and crucial to the success of the constituti­onally mandated count, which surveys each household in the country every 10 years. That confidenti­ality is enshrined in the Census Act of 1879.

In 1954, Congress codified the rules, which say that the Commerce Department, which oversees the survey, cannot share the data with any other government agency or court. Violators are subject to up to five years in federal prison and up to $250,000 in fines. The law can only be changed by Congress.

The Justice Department email was included in documents filed in San Francisco federal court for a trial slated to begin in January.

It appeared to leave open the possibilit­y of reconsider­ing the 2010 memo, which was issued at the time of the first decennial census to be conducted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and the creation of the Patriot Act.

The Department of Justice declined to comment on the email or on whether census confidenti­ality is subject to debate. Acting Census Bureau director Ron Jarmin has blogged about the importance of confidenti­ality of the count.

The revelation comes at a time when immigrant communitie­s feel besieged and are already worried about participat­ing in the count, which determines the allocation of $800 billion a year in federal funds along with congressio­nal apportionm­ent.

Gomez’s question asked if there was “any provision of any law that might compel Census to disclose confidenti­al census data for law enforcemen­t or national security purposes?”

In the email to Gore about how to respond, Aguinaga wrote, “I don’t think we want to say too much there in case the issues… or related issues come up later for renewed debate. So, I’ve just said that the Department will abide by all laws requiring confidenti­ality.” It is unclear whether Gore answered the email. Gomez’s office said it received a reply with that wording months later.

Six lawsuits have challenged the administra­tion’s decision to add a citizenshi­p question to the count, saying it will dissuade immigrants and their families from filling out the forms and lead to an inaccurate and more costly count.

Filling out the census is required by law. The cost of the count increases when census workers must circle back to households that do not return the forms in the initial round.

Additional uncertaint­y about whether their responses will be protected would likely further undermine the count, census experts say.

“It could reinforce fears about how this administra­tion could use census responses,” said Terri Ann Lowenthal, a former staff director of the House census oversight subcommitt­ee. Gomez’s question “should have been an easy opportunit­y for the Justice Department to reaffirm that there is an ironclad wall around personal census responses.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States