Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

David’s Bridal files for debt relief; aims to avoid closing

- LAUREN COLEMAN-LOCHNER AND KATHERINE DOHERTY

David’s Bridal Inc., the country’s largest specialty bridal chain, is filing for bankruptcy, but it isn’t planning to close stores or interrupt operations. David’s filed for court protection Monday with a goal of emerging by mid-January so the bankruptcy won’t interfere with peak wedding season.

It’s also taking more than the usual measures to soothe customers, some of them with thousands of dollars at stake for their big day.

Previous retail filings like Bon-Ton Stores Inc. and Toys R Us Inc. ended in liquida-

tion. And brides-to-be may remember the collapse of the second-largest bridal chain, Alfred Angelo, last year, which precipitou­sly shut down after filing for bankruptcy, said Raya Sokolyansk­a, a senior analyst at Moody’s Investors Service.

“It’s still pretty fresh in people’s minds,” she said, making messaging to customers crucial.

“We are, and will continue to be open for business, and we hope to see you soon,” Chief Executive Officer Scott Key said in a video on the retailer’s website. Every customer who has a current order with David’s Bridal has received an email confirming the status of her order, tracking informatio­n and expected delivery date, a company representa­tive said, and anyone who calls David’s will get a message from Key confirming that there have been no changes to her arrangemen­ts or ability to keep shopping.

As of Oct. 31, David’s was holding about $32 million in deposits for 82,000 special orders and owed customers nearly $4 million in merchandis­e or cash through gift cards, an online cash-reward program and store credit, according

to court records.

“There is a risk that they may seek to cancel their orders, seek a return of their purchase deposits or purchase merchandis­e and services from another bridal retailer,” if brides aren’t quickly reassured that deposits and other customer programs will be honored, the company said.

Both David’s and Alfred Angelo struggled to adapt to changes in fashion and spending habits, a challenge compounded in David’s case by buyout debt that’s weighed it down for years amid shrinking earnings.

Those obligation­s gave it less flexibilit­y to invest in needed capabiliti­es like digital, Sokolyansk­a said. The rise of online competitor­s and wedding sites also put pricing pressure on traditiona­l retailers, she said.

Nor did changing preference­s help what Sokolyansk­a calls “the Walmart of wedding gowns.” While spending on higher-end weddings picked up after the recession, David’s core lower-income customers started delaying or scaling back their celebratio­ns. Meanwhile, bridesmaid­s, a key part of the business, were seeking more individual and affordable dresses.

Executives have taken steps to stem the decline, she said, adding more plus-sized and

special-occasion merchandis­e. David’s has also done well with its higher-end Vera Wang dresses, but not enough to offset the declines from its lower-income customers.

“Operating in this environmen­t is more expensive,” she said.

It’s also more demanding, all in a quest to win and please shoppers who in most cases aren’t going to be repeat customers. “The stakes are high and things have to be perfect,” Sokolyansk­a said. “It’s hard to please that bride. Emotions run high and they can spill out on social media.”

David’s began life 68 years ago as Phillie Bridals with one salon in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. The turn of the century brought a procession of suitors: May Department Stores bought the chain in 2000 before merging with a rival, which sold it to privateequ­ity firms Leonard Green Partners and TPG Capital in early 2007. Five years later, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice took control in a $1.05 billion leveraged buyout.

David’s is the latest in a procession of merchants outrun by buyout debt. It’s been in active talks with its creditors for weeks and, through the bankruptcy, will hand over equity in the reorganize­d company to senior lenders including Oaktree Capital

Group.

A quick reorganiza­tion is essential, said Jeffrey Schwartz, a bankruptcy attorney at McKool Smith, because costs pile up and “things generally don’t get better with too much time.” If the company controls its messaging properly, “it should be business as usual.”

The restructur­ing will give David’s more money to invest in growth, and it plans to emerge with all of its stores intact and ample financing. Still, Sokolyansk­a at Moody’s doesn’t envision a second honeymoon for its growth outlook.

“I see this as more of a story of maintainin­g what they have as opposed to a growth opportunit­y,” she said. “I don’t think they go back to the type of profitabil­ity they had in the past.”

Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Steven Church of Bloomberg News.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States