Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Ballot-measure victories stir ideas for 2020

Activists in state looking at redistrict­ing, recreation­al marijuana, vote changes

- JOHN MORITZ

As vote returns began rolling in on election night this month, the architect of one of Arkansas’ successful ballot measures chatted online with people backing redistrict­ing initiative­s in Missouri, Michigan, Colorado and Utah.

In those four states, voters approved initiated measures that supporters said would make the redrawing of legislativ­e and congressio­nal district boundaries less partisan.

David Couch watched the results come in with an eye toward 2020, when he hopes to put a similar proposal on the ballot.

Arkansas voters have approved initiated acts and constituti­onal amendments — this year, on wage increases and an expansion of casino gambling, and in 2016, the legalizati­on of medical marijuana — over the opposition of Republican leaders. Couch proposed the initiated act on the minimum wage and the constituti­onal amendment on marijuana.

The success of those citizen-pitched measures has spurred advocates such as Couch to draft more ideas to put before voters in two years.

Besides Couch’s redistrict­ing measure, other proposals would legalize recreation­al marijuana; alter campaign finance; allow voting by mail; and make other electoral changes that are gaining ground in other states.

“There are a lot of popular populist issues out there that for whatever reason the General Assembly doesn’t want to take on themselves,” Couch said recently. “I’ve always said this, Arkansas is more of a populist state.”

Arkansas voters also tend to approve amendments referred to them by lawmakers.

In the most recent election, they approved an amendment that will require voter identifica­tion. The Legislatur­e is allowed under the constituti­on to refer three constituti­onal amendments when it meets in regular sessions.

In just the first day of bill pre-filing ahead of the 2019 regular session, lawmakers submitted proposals to end the biennial fiscal session and to change primary elections so all candidates face off in the first election, regardless of party.

Couch has already cleared the first hurdle toward getting his redistrict­ing proposal on the 2020 ballot: The attorney general’s office approved the wording of its popular name and ballot title.

Couch said he will soon begin the process of soliciting the roughly 89,000 valid signatures of voters required to put the proposal on the ballot.

Once they get on a general election ballot, constituti­onal amendments and initiated acts require a simple majority of votes for approval.

Couch headed a committee that spent more than $885,000 in 2016 supporting the medical-marijuana amendment. Most of the money went to pay canvassers to gather signatures.

He said he was likely to use a similar method to gather signatures for his redistrict­ing proposal. He said the funds likely would come from 501(c) (4) groups — defined by the IRS as “social welfare organizati­ons” — and would be disclosed in public reports to the state Ethics Commission.

“We’ve always been open about it,” Couch said.

“If you have enough money, you can go a long way to put things on the ballot and get

people to vote for it,” said Jerry Cox, the president of the conservati­ve, faith-based Family Council. Family Council opposed the casino amendment but relied on a grass-roots efforts to fight it. Supporters of that amendment spent more than $6.9 million on their effort.

REDISTRICT­ING

Redistrict­ing of legislativ­e and congressio­nal boundaries takes place after the U.S. Census, next scheduled for 2020. Over the decades, Republican­s and Democrats across the country have been accused of gerrymande­ring, or redrawing districts to favor their candidates.

State and federal courts in North Carolina and Pennsylvan­ia ruled that the GOPdrawn maps there were so skewed that they violated the U.S. Constituti­on. The courts ordered them to be redrawn. Challenges to the maps in other states are pending.

In addition to the four states where voters supported overhauls this month, Ohioans approved a new redistrict­ing process in the spring that requires greater input from members of the minority party.

“We’ve never seen that much activity around reform,” said Michael Li of the Brannon Center for Justice’s Democracy Program. Redistrict­ing initiative­s “passed in all those states with bipartisan support. They’re outperform­ing Republican­s in those states.”

Li said the Brannon Center does not offer financial support to initiative­s that would change the redistrict­ing process.

In Arkansas, redistrict­ing of the four U.S. House districts is done by the Legislatur­e, while a Board of Apportionm­ent made up of the governor, attorney general and secretary of state draw the boundaries for state legislativ­e districts.

Democrats controlled both processes when the lines were last drawn in 2011, but were unable to stop Republican­s from taking control of the Legislatur­e and statewide offices.

Now set to control the process after the 2020 Census, Republican­s such as Gov. Asa Hutchinson have accused Democrats of wanting to change the rules.

But Couch, an attorney from Little Rock, said voters “are tired of politician­s doing things for politician­s, and not for people.”

Under Couch’s proposed constituti­onal amendment, the majority and minority leaders of the state House and Senate would together appoint four members of a seven-member redistrict­ing commission. Those appointed members would in turn pick three others to fill the remaining seats.

The amendment also proposes rules on what the redistrict­ing commission may and may not consider when drawing the district lines. For example, the commission would be required to minimize splitting up counties or cities into different districts, and would be barred from considerin­g data on voters’ party affiliatio­ns and the home addresses of incumbent lawmakers.

RECREATION­AL POT

When Arkansas voters approved the legalizati­on of medical marijuana in 2016, voters in four other states — California, Nevada, Maine and Massachuse­tts — moved ahead with full legalizati­on of recreation­al marijuana.

Since then, two more states have followed suit, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es, raising to 10 the number of states with full marijuana legalizati­on.

Two marijuana advocates in Arkansas, Melissa Fults and attorney John Wesley Hall, said they see an opportunit­y for Arkansas to become the first state in the South to legalize

recreation­al marijuana. They’ve drafted several proposals for a ballot amendment in 2020, all of which so far have been rejected by Attorney General Leslie Rutledge.

In written responses declining to certify the “Arkansas Cannabis Amendment” submitted by Fults and Hall, Rutledge pointed out “fundamenta­l flaws” with the language in their proposal.

Rutledge said it was “unclear” what effect the amendment would have on Arkansas’ medical-marijuana program. (Medical marijuana is expected to be available early next year.)

Her office has rejected more than a dozen proposals related to marijuana legalizati­on the past three months.

Rutledge drew criticism earlier this year for repeatedly rejecting citizen-drafted measures, including Couch’s minimum wage and redistrict­ing proposals, based on similar alleged deficienci­es.

Defending her office’s decision not to certify the proposals, Rutledge said the Arkansas Supreme Court had set exacting standards by knocking previous measures off the ballot after they had been certified by her office.

Ultimately, faced with lawsuits and an ultimatum from the state Supreme Court, Rutledge approved the measures, though she said the justices had “muddied the waters” by forcing her hand.

Hall said he was preparing to submit a new draft to Rutledge around the first of the year.

Commercial companies that have prospered in states with legal marijuana likely would offer financial backing to a legalizati­on effort in Arkansas, Hall said. And he pointed to prominent Republican­s who have lent their support to legalizati­on.

“If [former Republican Speaker of the House] John

Boehner is for it, why isn’t the whole world for it?” Hall said recently.

However, Cox, the Family Council director who opposed the 2016 medical-marijuana amendment, said he did not believe Arkansas’ voters were ready to take the next step so soon after approving medical marijuana.

“I don’t believe public opinion will allow recreation­al marijuana to pass,” Cox said. He cited polling from 2016 that showed voters were “very strongly against” full legalizati­on.

Couch said he has no plans to become involved in marijuana legalizati­on efforts in 2020.

However, he speculated that voter frustratio­n with the Medical Marijuana Commission — which hasn’t moved fast enough for some in making medical marijuana available — could lend support to full legalizati­on in 2020.

ELECTORAL CHANGES

Fults, the backer of legalizing marijuana, also said she planned to pitch separate initiated acts to a create a vote-bymail system in Arkansas and to establish ranked-choice voting.

Mail-based voting was one of the key policy goals of Susan Inman, a Democratic candidate who lost her bid for secretary of state to Republican John Thurston.

A former state elections director and Pulaski County election commission­er, Inman said voting by mail would increase voter turnout while cutting costs. Opponents of mail-voting, including Thurston, questioned its security.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es, only three states — Oregon, Washington and Colorado — mail ballots to every voter in each election. In all, 22 states allow voting by mail in certain elections.

Ranked-choice voting is an even rarer form of voting in the United States.

According to the nonprofit advocacy organizati­on FairVote, only Maine uses rankedchoi­ce

voting for state and federal offices, though several major cities, including Minneapoli­s and San Francisco, also use the system for local elections.

Two recently submitted proposals from Fults’ husband, Gary Fults, propose a rankedchoi­ce voting system similar to the one establishe­d by Maine voters through a 2016 ballot measure.

While filling out their ballots, voters would rank their preferred candidates for each office. If no candidate receives a simple majority, vote counters would take ballots cast for the last-place finisher and reassign those voters’ next highest choice to the remaining candidates, until one has a majority.

Because the system automatica­lly reassigns votes for low-polling candidates, rankedchoi­ce voting eliminates the need for runoff elections. As such, this method is sometimes called “instant-runoff voting.”

After reviewing the proposal, Rutledge rejected the measure, writing that she believed the courts would question whether voters would understand the the system, which she called “a radical change in election law.”

In its first general election test in Maine, incumbent U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin, a Republican, was the only member of the state’s congressio­nal delegation not to reach a 50 percent threshold during the first round of voting. After tallying the votes in the instant runoff, Poliquin’s challenger, Democrat Jared Golden, was declared the winner.

State Rep. Dan Douglas, R-Bentonvill­e, has proposed a constituti­onal amendment that would change Arkansas’ partisan primary election into a nonpartisa­n blanket primary, the so-called jungle primary.

Currently, California, Louisiana and Washington utilize a jungle primary for all elections, in which the top two finishers, regardless of party, go on to a runoff. Nebraska uses the system for state legislativ­e races.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States