Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Cameras aboard recycling trucks

They help detect carts’ non-recyclable­s, which stand at 30%

- EMILY WALKENHORS­T

Cameras on recycling trucks are helping drivers detect contaminat­ed materials being placed in curbside recycling carts throughout Pulaski County.

Drivers are detecting contaminat­ion in up to 7% of the carts, depending on the route, said Bailey Moll, a Waste Management representa­tive.

Contaminat­ion by weight is about 30% as it has been for several months, Moll said. Waste Management collects more than 1,000 tons of materials from recycling bins each month.

When Waste Management drivers see contaminat­ion, they are supposed to place a sticker on the recycling cart and decline to empty it. Tagged recycling carts are then logged, and Waste Management is working on eventually having its computer system automatica­lly report homes that have been repeatedly tagged to the cities and the county’s regional solid waste management district.

It’s among the latest developmen­ts in more than a year of efforts to educate people on how to properly recycle.

In June, the Regional Recycling and Waste Reduction District, a state solid waste management district that operates only in Pulaski County, mailed residents the first of a handful of postcards explaining what they can and cannot recycle.

Waste Management is paying for the postage (nearly $18,000). The mailings are sent to Little Rock, North Little Rock, Sherwood and unincorpor­ated Pulaski County residents participat­ing in the curbside recycling program.

The postcards prompted numerous phone calls from people asking about what is allowed in recycling bins, Reita Miller, chief informatio­n officer with the district, told district board members last month.

The district has recently put up outdoor advertisem­ents, too. Billboards resemble the postcards — minus most of the text — showing empty plastic bottles, empty aluminum cans, paper and unfolded cardboard.

China cited contaminat­ion in recycling from the United States as its reason for no longer purchasing almost any recyclable­s from U.S. companies. That decision has depressed U.S. recycling markets and left recycling companies with municipal and business recycling contracts that are no longer profitable to them.

Some U.S. cities have done away with recycling programs, and many fear the recycling companies will eventually take quality, non-contaminat­ed materials to landfills because trash hauling remains profitable.

“If the recycler can’t sell it … recycling doesn’t work,” said Craig Douglass, executive director of the Regional Recycling and Waste Reduction District. The district has simplified its list of recyclable materials for customers to keep their recycling programs viable, he told the district’s board last month.

The district has promoted its materials on social media and will soon air a new 30-second television advertisem­ent on cable channels, promoting its green stations for glass and electronic­s recycling and its website MyDoRight.com. Promotions, so far, have increased traffic to the website, which explains what can and cannot be recycled, Douglass said.

Douglass has goals that go beyond what the district and Waste Management are already doing. Eventually, he wants to track which neighborho­ods are the larger offenders of the recycling rules.

The district would use that informatio­n to better target those areas through neighborho­od groups or homeowners associatio­ns, Douglass said. The district receives reports now on contaminat­ed carts that include addresses, and the district could reach out to each resident to educate them on recycling, he said.

“The tagging is very important,” Douglass said, “because the best education happens at the curb.”

Normally, cities remove recycling carts from the homes that too frequently attempt to recycle improperly.

By March, North Little Rock had removed 575 recycling carts, and Little Rock had removed about 50, Douglass said. Sherwood and Pulaski County had removed none. Cities have been asked not to remove any while Waste Management audits the recycling routes, so he doesn’t expect the numbers to have changed much since then.

A recent daily contaminat­ion report by Waste Management showed nearly 400 curbside residentia­l recycling carts were “contaminat­ed/unacceptab­le” across the three cities and the county’s unincorpor­ated area. Several businesses were also flagged for contaminat­ion.

All recycling loads are taken to Waste Management’s materials recovery facility, Recycle America. Just what is contaminat­ed and what is OK to be processed is determined there. Anything judged to be improper is loaded into another truck and hauled to Waste Management’s landfill.

Recycling contaminat­ion since January has hovered just below 30%, Moll said. Last year, it was as high as 45%, he said.

He credits the reduction in contaminat­ion to Waste Management, district and city efforts to tag carts, remove carts and educate recyclers through advertisem­ents, social media and news stories.

But part of the difficulty in significan­tly reducing the contaminat­ion rate isn’t an education issue, he said.

Because the rate is based on weight, a single heavy object that is considered contaminat­ion can outweigh numerous items that are OK to recycle.

“If we got the heavy, stupid stuff out, that rate would be lower. I’m not sure that can be educated,” Moll said. “I don’t think anyone thinks rocks and toilets are recyclable. They are just intentiona­lly abusing the system.”

A kind of contaminat­ion that spoils a clean load, or part of a load, is called “putrescibl­e.”

That’s baby diapers, spoiled food, liquids, oils and other such materials, Moll said. They spill and ruin other materials, such as paper and cardboard.

“Hopefully, the new education happening will lessen the stinky and wet garbage,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States