Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Helping doesn’t mean fixing

- tellme@washpost.com CAROLYN HAX

DEAR CAROLYN: My partner completed an undergradu­ate degree but struggled to find a career in that industry. Under pressure from family, they followed and struggled through a career path they hated for two years before deciding to go back to college to complete another undergradu­ate in something they thought they would prefer as a career path.

Their mental health meant this was a difficult adjustment, and while I’m supporting them through it, they are still questionin­g if even now this is their right career path.

How can I keep helping them when they don’t know what they want to do?

— E.

DEAR READER: Foremost, you need to define “help” so that it’s a manageable size for one person who is not directly involved.

This is your partner’s struggle, and it’s bigger than just a career. By my count, there’s a mental health problem, a bad fit with the first career choice, an over-involved family, your partner’s own susceptibi­lity to pressure from said family (and possibly external pressure in general), an intemperan­ce in decision-making that’s now responsibl­e for two unsatisfyi­ng tuition-based two-or-fouryear educations, and possibly a second bad career fit.

That’s a lot. So it’s understand­able you want to help, much more so than you would if your partner were just having a bad week. But the role of even the most loving, involved bystander is to understand that you can’t jump in and fix it — and short of emergency interventi­on, you’re ultimately just as limited in your options in the face of a full breakdown as you are with the bad week. You can love, encourage, listen, play devil’s advocate, offer ideas, do a few extra chores, even underwrite the whole thing financiall­y, if you’re able and willing (“support” can have two meanings here, and you don’t specify which), but you can’t be the one who:

■ Seeks the mental health care;

■ Does the hard emotional work;

■ Gains the self-knowledge;

■ Chooses the career;

■ Gets the training or education;

■ Sets and holds the boundaries with family.

If your partner is not ready to do these, then you need to decide how to maintain your own well-being as your partner figures out how to get to that point.

A good therapist can help you here, if the true north of understand­ing your limits is not enough to guide you through it.

In the offering-ideas department: May I suggest that you suggest the following strategy to your partner? Put the second degree on hold; find tolerable work that pays enough bills; and shift full emphasis to mental health. Not just for treatment, but toward peace of mind.

Life choices made under pressure — external especially, but internal, too — tend to breed regrets. And schools generally accommodat­e returns from leave, because it helps the graduation rate, so this can just be a temporary break to refocus.

If it instead becomes a cutting of losses, then that’s not ideal, but it’s a steep improvemen­t on steering another two or four years in the wrong direction.

The “right” career, meanwhile, doesn’t always announce itself when we want it to (or ever — there are no guarantees). So a lot of us just work and think and … live. And breathe, until our minds can open enough to see where that kind of life takes us.

I hope for both of your sakes your partner’s ready to get that fresh air.

DEAR CAROLYN: We have a neighbor who tells us things that happen at other people’s homes. She doesn’t seem to care that it isn’t her informanti­on to share with others. And she also makes herself comfortabl­e at the house where she gets the most info.

Is my uncomforta­ble feeling warranted or am I being too sensitive?

— Uncomforta­ble

DEAR READER: Of course it’s warranted. You get to decide what informatio­n you’d rather not have or share.

It doesn’t just end there, however. If you find her gossip disrespect­ful of others’ privacy, then you need to say so. “I’m not comfortabl­e with this conversati­on,” or, “This is their private business.”

Or, more pointedly, if you have the stomach for it: “Is this how you talk about us when we’re not here?”

It’s a rhetorical question, because you know the answer already. This is exactly how she talks about you when you’re not there.

The point of saying this is not to get her to stop — she won’t — but instead to let her know you have no illusions about her ethics and values.

You need the fortitude because someone who uses people this plainly for her own amusement also poses a retaliatio­n risk. Challengin­g her could draw her attention to you as a target.

However, we do tend to fear being gossiped about disproport­ionately to its harm. “Have at it, Lady” would make a fine mantra here.

Plus, which is worse — standing up to her at the risk of drawing negative attention, or ducking while others get the brunt of it who aren’t there to stand up for themselves?

Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email

 ?? Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS ??
Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States