Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

UA System’s trustees back issue of bonds

Proposal would help fund energy project at UAMS

- KAT STROMQUIST

MORRILTON — University of Arkansas System trustees on Wednesday signed off on a $156 million bond issue, the latest step for an expansion and modernizat­ion project at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

After a brief discussion during the trustees’ annual retreat at the Winthrop Rockefelle­r Institute in Morrilton, the board unanimousl­y voted in favor of a resolution supporting the revenue-bond issue.

The trustees also approved a law firm to serve as bond counsel and Stephens Inc. and Crews & Associates to serve as co-senior managers in underwriti­ng the bonds.

The project, which requires the involvemen­t and approval of several agencies, encountere­d a hiccup when trustees tabled a resolution of support when it was first presented to them in March. After discussion­s with UAMS officials, and after a second presentati­on in May, trustees in July authorized the project to move forward.

Wednesday’s action clears the way for the bond issue to be presented to the Arkansas Department of Higher Education Coordinati­ng Board, which is required to review its economic feasibilit­y.

“We want to get this done as soon as possible … as soon as we can get all the pieces in place,” Amanda George, UAMS’ chief financial officer and vice chancellor for finance, said in an interview Wednesday.

As proposed by UAMS officials and Bernhard Energy, the firm selected to oversee the work, the project will build a roughly $51 million electricit­y plant on the east side of UAMS’ campus in Little Rock.

It also will knock down an unused building and make changes to mechanical, electrical, heating and air conditioni­ng and other systems, which university and Bernhard officials say will reduce energy usage.

Over a 20-year period, savings produced through the more efficient equipment — some of which are guaranteed by Bernhard — are expected to pay for the project’s financing, under a state program that permits such initiative­s.

Before Wednesday’s vote, the conversati­on included comments from Trustee C.C. “Cliff” Gibson and others expressing concern about an aggregate interest rate for the bonds “not to exceed 5.5%,” as described in documents.

Officials said that’s unlikely to be the actual rate; the figure is being used as a placeholde­r in part because a split between taxable and tax-exempt bonds is still being determined.

A previous large project financed by bonds saw an interest rate of somewhere around 3%, and officials want to take advantage of favorable financial conditions, University of Arkansas System Chief Financial Officer Gina Terry told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

UAMS administra­tors have been preparing for the project to get underway for more than a year, interviewi­ng project managers, undergoing review by the Arkansas Energy Office and meeting with city officials and people who live near the academic medical center.

Despite those preparatio­ns, UAMS Chief Operating Officer Christina Clark told trustees on Wednesday that some specifics of the agreement with Bernhard are still being hammered out.

The “chicken and egg” situation occurred because the contract can’t be completed before the bonds are priced and other related details are finalized, said Michele Allgood, an attorney for the bond counsel law firm Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard.

UAMS officials said they’re considerin­g asking for a special meeting of the Higher Education Coordinati­ng Board, which is not scheduled to convene until Oct. 25, to gain its approval.

The project also recently got a go-ahead from the Little Rock Board of Directors, which voted to kick in $4.6 million for proposed changes associated with the project to the layout of Pine and Cedar streets.

Last week, the Baton Rouge-area newspaper The Advocate reported that Bernhard and a partner are planning to make energy upgrades to 31 public buildings in Louisiana.

Clark said she was aware that the company had engaged in similar work elsewhere but that she had not specifical­ly discussed it.

“They’ve done several of these [projects] across the country,” she said. “This is just one of the largest.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States