Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Female Ford workers dealt suit setback

- KAREN ZRAICK

A federal judge in Chicago ruled this week that a lawsuit brought by female Ford employees over sexual misconduct at two Chicago plants cannot proceed as a class-action suit.

The ruling was a setback for the plaintiffs, who said they had endured groping, vulgaritie­s and sexual violence despite the company’s efforts to change a longstandi­ng culture of harassment.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by more than 30 women, accuses the company of not doing enough to ensure a safe and equitable work environmen­t. It sought to include all women who worked at Ford’s assembly or stamping plants in Chicago from 2012 to the present.

But Judge Robert Dow Jr. of the Northern District of Illinois ruled that the women’s experience­s were too disparate to be considered as a single class.

The plaintiffs can still sue as individual­s.

The culture of harassment at Ford was described in a 2017 investigat­ion by The New York Times that included detailed accounts from workers in the two plants dating back to the 1990s.

It concluded that the company’s efforts to stamp out sexual misconduct had fallen short.

The company’s president and chief executive, Jim Hackett, apologized for any harassment that had occurred in an open letter days after the article was published. In a statement Friday, Ford said that it had a “comprehens­ive approach” in place to prevent and address sexual harassment and discrimina­tion.

“While we are pleased with the judge’s decision,” the statement said, “we will continue to reinforce the importance of respectful, harassment-free environmen­ts at all of our facilities, including our Chicago plants.”

The company said that it had increased its human resources staff by 30% and put a number of new policies in place, including additional training and rules that employees disclose personal relationsh­ips.

Lawyers for the women did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

The company first faced sustained criticism about sexual harassment at the two plants in the 1990s, when dozens of women sued or filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission.

In a settlement with that agency in 2000, Ford agreed to pay $22 million, including $9 million in damages to at least 100 women.

As part of the deal, the company denied liability but pledged to make changes overseen by outside monitors.

Conditions seemed to improve for a time, but complaints about sexual harassment surged once again around 2011. By then, the company was recovering from the recession, and new hires had flooded into factories.

By August 2017, the EEOC and Ford had reached another settlement, for $10 million, over sexual and racial harassment at the two Chicago plants.

On Friday, a spokeswoma­n for the company said 835 workers had received checks as part of the settlement. The full terms were confidenti­al, but the deal required more improvemen­ts at the company, including greater accountabi­lity for managers. Monitors will oversee the plants for five years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States