Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

KITTLE PENALTY adds scrutiny to replay system.

-

MIAMI — A season in which the NFL struggled with its instant replay reviews of pass interferen­ce calls ended with a Super Bowl that included a mini-controvers­y over a key penalty called in the final moments of the first half.

The San Francisco 49ers lost a scoring opportunit­y when a long completion from quarterbac­k Jimmy Garoppolo to tight end George Kittle was negated when Kittle was called for offensive pass interferen­ce for a modest push-off against Kansas City safety Daniel Sorensen. Instead of attempting a go-ahead field goal just before halftime, the 49ers had to settle for a 10-10 tie at the break of a game they eventually lost 31-20 on Sunday night.

“The ref made the call,” Kittle said after the game, “and I’ve got to live with it.”

San Francisco Coach Kyle Shanahan said afterward that he thought his team “should have got points” during that sequence “but they ended up calling that” pass interferen­ce on Kittle.

“I mean, I don’t get to see it very good from the sideline,” Shanahan said. “But I was definitely surprised, the way they were letting the whole game go.”

The call was debated by fans and other observers on social media. Kittle extended his arm and gave Sorensen a relatively light shove before making the catch for a 42yard gain to the Kansas City 13-yard line. Some observers maintained that the contact wasn’t significan­t enough for a penalty to be called. Others contended the flag was justified.

Former NFL referee Terry McAulay, now a rules analyst for NBC, wrote on Twitter that Kittle’s push “was significan­tly less force” than a shove by Minnesota Vikings tight end Kyle Rudolph that went uncalled — and unchanged by instant replay — on his game-winning catch against the New Orleans Saints during this season’s NFC playoffs.

“But I also think that was a foul and a correct call,” McAulay wrote of the Kittle penalty.

The NFL’s officiatin­g department supported the interferen­ce call made Sunday night by the on-field officials and did not overturn the ruling on replay. Shanahan was not permitted to challenge the call. Under the replay rules, interferen­ce calls and non-calls can be challenged by coaches in the first 28 minutes of each half but interferen­ce-related reviews are under the control of the replay official during the final two minutes of each half.

“The receiver extends his arm and creates separation while the ball is in the air, therefore it is offensive pass interferen­ce,” Al Riveron, the league’s senior vice president of officiatin­g, wrote on the Twitter account of the NFL’s officiatin­g department.

McAulay wrote, “I agree with that analysis.” But he and others pointed to the Rudolph play and wondered about the consistenc­y of the league’s applicatio­n of the pass interferen­ce rules via the instant replay rulings made on reviews of interferen­ce calls and non-calls.

The NFL’s team owners, at the behest of the league’s head coaches, made interferen­ce calls and non-calls reviewable by replay this season in the aftermath of the missed defensive pass interferen­ce penalty against the Los Angeles Rams during last season’s NFC title game in New Orleans. The non-call helped send the Rams, rather than the Saints, to last year’s Super Bowl.

The move was made despite the reservatio­ns of the NFL’s rulemaking competitio­n committee, which always had resisted making judgment calls such as pass interferen­ce reviewable by replay.

This season’s results included widespread complaints by coaches, players and fans about the league’s applicatio­n of the new replay system. Coaches decried what they called a lack of consistenc­y in the replay rulings made by Riveron and the league office. Some said they no longer knew what constitute­d pass interferen­ce and what didn’t.

The league has promised a thorough review of all officiatin­g issues, including the leadership of the officiatin­g department, and the replay-for-interferen­ce system. NFL leaders accepted late in the season that the new replay system was not functionin­g as the teams intended, after originally taking the stance that the coaches had pushed for the rule and therefore it was incumbent on them to adjust to how the replay rulings were being made.

The owners approved the new replay rule on only a oneyear trial basis, so the system will have to be renewed this offseason to remain in effect. The competitio­n committee’s deliberati­ons are to begin in earnest beginning later this month at the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapol­is. The owners could take a renewal vote during the annual league meeting in March in Palm Beach.

 ?? (AP/Mark Humphrey) ?? George Kittle of the San Francisco 49eres catches a pass in front of Daniel Sorensen of the Kansas City Chiefs at the end of the first half that was called back because of an offensive pass interferen­ce penalty on Kittle. The penalty added scrutiny during a season in which pass interferen­ce penalties were subject to instant replay review, and coaches and players complained about a lack of consistenc­y when it was called.
(AP/Mark Humphrey) George Kittle of the San Francisco 49eres catches a pass in front of Daniel Sorensen of the Kansas City Chiefs at the end of the first half that was called back because of an offensive pass interferen­ce penalty on Kittle. The penalty added scrutiny during a season in which pass interferen­ce penalties were subject to instant replay review, and coaches and players complained about a lack of consistenc­y when it was called.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States