Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

All the wrong moves

- JAY STERLING SILVER Jay Sterling Silver is a law professor at St. Thomas University School of Law.

In the Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scandal, Rob Manfred, commission­er of Major League Baseball, has talked like a prosecutor investigat­ing wrongdoing and willing to impose punishment on the perpetrato­rs. So the public, the fans, and the teams damaged by the cheating can hardly be faulted for being mystified and outraged by the total lack of punishment for the players who cheated.

Manfred’s handling of this scandal is disappoint­ing, but it’s not at all surprising that the MLB investigat­ion would end up like this.

The investigat­ion didn’t result in punishment or real accountabi­lity, because Manfred’s role is not as a real prosecutor seeking justice or deterrence. His duty is to protect the owners who employ him and make money from their considerab­le investment­s in a major league baseball team.

Penalties and profits don’t always mix, and this would appear to be a classic example. Reputation, viewership and ticket sales are in jeopardy when the integrity of the game comes into question.

With spring training presumably redirectin­g the attention of players and fans, what would be a better way for the representa­tive of baseball’s owners to handle serious cheating than to sweep it under the rug as quickly as possible? No union appeals, minimal disillusio­nment of the Houston fan base, and a modest fine that would pacify angry players and fans. No muss, no fuss.

The charade of an investigat­ion purporting to serve justice began with the commission­er’s grant of across-the-board immunity to all the Houston players involved in season-long cheating. Manfred is right that perpetrato­rs generally won’t describe their involvemen­t or how a scheme operated without a grant of immunity. But in real investigat­ions immunity is sparingly granted, with it given first to a little fish or two who can implicate bigger fish. Mass immunity goes by a different name: amnesty.

Manfred has sought to justify his across-theboard immunity to the Houston players as the only way he could learn the details of the sign stealing. As an investigat­ive tactic it makes no sense. He essentiall­y learned the same thing over and over from all the teammates. In exchange, everyone was let off the hook with not even a slap on the wrist. It’s hard to think of a more effective way to encourage cheating.

Manfred’s second error was to blame the players’ union for across-the-board immunity. According to the commission­er, his hands were tied. Which couldn’t be further from the truth. The players’ union functions in this case much like a defense attorney—bound to seek the most favorable outcome for a client. When defense counsel represents that he or she will appeal any punishment imposed on a client, a prosecutor does not, quaking in his or her boots, quickly abort the case via a grant of immunity.

Manfred’s final error is to insist that the Astros’ 2017 World Series Championsh­ip, secured with the aid of knowing which pitch would be coming next, cannot be rescinded. He claims there’s no precedent for this action, but he’s wrong. There is plenty of precedent for revoking titles in sports competitio­ns. It has been done in sports of every sort, from basketball to cycling, tennis to lacrosse, track and field to volleyball.

Manfred and MLB had hoped to wrap up this scandal and move on. Only it hasn’t turned out that way. The public and the 29 other major league teams aren’t pacified and the damage to baseball will last for a long, long time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States