Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Maryland passes education bill

Critics of proposed overhaul cite cost, accountabi­lity concerns

- OVETTA WIGGINS Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Erin Cox of The Washington Post.

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The Maryland House of Delegates on Friday night approved a public schools bill, attempting to implement the first major overhaul on education policy by a state since Massachuse­tts approved legislatio­n nearly three decades ago.

The bill would set in place a 10-year plan to expand prekinderg­arten; increase funding to schools with a high percentage of poor, special education or limited-English students; raise teacher pay and increase standards; and add more programs to ensure that students are prepared for college and careers.

The House voted 96-41, along partisan lines, after hours of debate.

“We haven’t done anything more significan­t for education in the state of Maryland since we created the Board of Education in the 1900s,” said Democratic Majority Leader Eric Luedtke.

“It addresses the problems we’ve known about in our schools for decades. We finally have the political will to do something about it.”

Gov. Larry Hogan and Republican lawmakers have criticized Democrats for pushing the plan without a funding source and blasted the overhaul effort as too expensive and lacking in accountabi­lity.

“This is a massive spending plan that is about to be foisted on the state of Maryland,” said Del. Haven Shoemaker Jr., a Republican who questioned whether more money would lead to better outcomes.

The governor helped orchestrat­e opposition that stopped a proposal to raise $2.9 billion for the changes by imposing the state sales tax on profession­al services.

The education bill is four years in the making but was fast-tracked in recent weeks. Luedtke said Democrats hope to present the plan and its funding source to Hogan by March 25, which would give the Maryland Legislatur­e time to override any gubernator­ial vetoes before the General Assembly adjourns April 6.

Luedtke added he was hopeful that Hogan would not veto the policy prescripti­ons but noted that the House advanced the bill on Friday with a veto-proof majority.

The education changes would cost nearly $4 billion a year by fiscal 2030, an amount that would require local and state contributi­ons but would largely fall to the state to cover.

Before the vote, Del. Alonzo T. Washington, a Democrat, defended the major investment.

“We’re not throwing money at a problem,” he said.

“We are making sure that students have the resources that they need to perform at a high level.”

Earlier on Friday, House Minority Leader Nicholaus Kipke, who spoke in support of an amendment that would put the program on “autopilot” after three years if students did not meet certain achievemen­t levels, said the state should take a cautious approach.

“If this plan is not working, we need to know,” the Republican said.

“We’re not asking for superhuman results. We’re just asking for a little assurance.”

Del. Ben Barnes, a Democrat, said the bill included an accountabi­lity provision that calls for an oversight board to ensure that districts are spending the money appropriat­ely. Kipke’s amendment failed 93-41, largely along partisan lines.

It was one of nearly 20 amendments, mostly offered by Republican­s, during the lengthy debate.

The others included: a push for more money for scholarshi­ps to private schools, greater authority for the state’s education inspector general and a proposal to stop the phase-in of the $15 minimum wage if the state is facing major revenue shortfalls.

Del. Jay Walker, the only Democrat to offer floor amendments, asked his colleagues to make a financial literacy course a graduation requiremen­t and to require school districts to provide 90 minutes of physical education a week to elementary school students. Both are bills he has pushed for several years, and each was rejected.

The General Assembly passed legislatio­n in 2016 to create a panel, commonly known as the Kirwan Commission, to study how to transform Maryland’s schools into a world-class system that could compete with those in China and Switzerlan­d.

Last year, policymake­rs issued a report that painted a grim portrait of the state’s public education system, arguing that, by not providing its students and teachers with proper resources, the state is failing them.

Among the findings: Fewer than 40% of kindergart­en students enter school ready to learn, and fewer than 40% graduate prepared for college or career.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States