Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. HALTS troops going in, out of Afghanista­n.

U.S. says Afghanista­n withdrawal on target; NATO unsure

- THOMAS GIBBONS-NEFF AND JULIAN E. BARNES

WASHINGTON — The U.S. commander in Afghanista­n is halting American and allied troops from entering Afghanista­n and, in turn, preventing some troops from leaving, for the next month, American and European officials said. The planning reflects mounting concerns as the coronaviru­s has spread in the country in recent days.

Gen. Austin Miller’s decision aims to protect his forces from the virus. But, in turn, it may complicate the drawdown of troops ordered by President Donald Trump after the United States recently signed a peace agreement with the Taliban.

American officials insist their Afghanista­n drawdown will continue as planned after the peace deal. But, for now, European diplomats say they are not so sure.

There are roughly 12,000 U.S. troops in Afghanista­n. But under an agreement signed between the Taliban and American diplomats last month, that number is set to decrease to 8,600 within the next 100 or so days. NATO and coalition forces, with roughly 8,700 troops in the country, were set to draw down a commensura­te amount.

Between the ongoing Taliban-fueled violence, political uncertaint­y at the top of the Afghan government and the possibilit­y of a larger outbreak of the virus, NATO has put aside for now discussion­s of the troop drawdown. European diplomats said the uncertaint­y in Afghanista­n will make it difficult for the Americans to stick to their drawdown plan and for NATO to follow with its own reductions.

NATO will release its annual report this week, and Secretary-General Jens Stoltenber­g is expected to address the Afghanista­n mission at a news conference today. Alliance officials declined to comment ahead of Stoltenber­g’s speech.

In a statement posted to Twitter, Col. Sonny Leggett, a spokesman for the U.S.-led mission in Afghanista­n, said that “protecting the force is our top priority.”

“We continue to execute the ordered drawdown to 8600,” he wrote.

Several European countries had tentative plans to deploy additional logistics troops to Afghanista­n to help close bases as part of the peace plan. But with the uncertaint­y over carrying out the peace agreement and a demand for logistical expertise in Europe to fight the virus, those deployment­s are on hold for now, a European official said.

The European official said that troops for several countries were on a two-week quarantine before entering Afghanista­n. On Tuesday, the German military said that its troops going into Afghanista­n would be quarantine­d for two weeks, and any troop swaps would be postponed for at least two weeks.

But the new orders could stretch that quarantine period for far longer, as the U.S.-led NATO command puts measures in place to try to slow the spread of the virus into Afghanista­n.

One allied official said that even in a worst-case scenario, the readiness of their forces should be only marginally affected. The pause in rotations will make sure personnel coming into Afghanista­n are virus-free and minimize any risk that troops leaving would infect others in their home countries.

Allied countries also plan to develop new protective measures, like isolating troops ahead of deployment­s. In addition, the official said, NATO nations are looking to send more medical staff to Afghanista­n to help protect and treat troops deployed there.

One Defense Department official said that the new measures were also intended to stop the spread of the virus by troops going into Afghanista­n from Europe. The fear, another official said, is having virus cases overwhelm a military medical system that is meant to support the war effort. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss plans that have not yet been made public.

There are other reasons to hold off on any rotations of European troops in and out of Afghanista­n. With other European countries expected to follow France’s domestic military deployment­s to try to enforce social-distancing rules at home, NATO countries could quickly discover they are running out of available troops.

American officials are particular­ly worried about the potential effect of the coronaviru­s on Afghanista­n and deeply concerned that the Afghan security forces, the troops they have trained to protect the country, will end up spreading it there.

There are at least 22 confirmed coronaviru­s cases in Afghanista­n, but testing is limited, and thousands of people from Iran, where the virus has spread and infected thousands, enter Afghanista­n’s porous western reaches daily.

But American troops returning from Afghanista­n are also running into their own complicati­ons.

The Pentagon’s directive to quarantine returning forces from overseas has created a short-term housing crisis as military commands have wrestled with putting large numbers of troops in areas with limited spaces and amenities for up to two weeks, a Defense Department official said.

In past weeks, at least 300 troops from the 82nd Airborne division returning from Afghanista­n have had to self-quarantine at Fort Bragg, N.C., and dozens more from the 1st Armored Division are doing the same at Fort Bliss, Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States