Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

In Iraq, rise in attacks vexing U.S.

Iran-backed militias’ aggression raises question on response

- LOUISA LOVELUCK AND MISSY RYAN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by John Hudson, Ellen Nakashima and Mustafa Salim of The Washington Post.

Iran-backed militias are becoming more audacious in attacking U.S. personnel in Iraq, with rocket strikes against military bases occurring more frequently and, for the first time, in broad daylight.

U.S. officials say they are receiving near-daily reports of “imminent” attacks planned against U.S.-linked military or diplomatic facilities.

In the two weeks since the U.S. carried out bombing raids outside Baghdad to avenge a rocket attack north of the capital that killed a Briton and two Americans, President Donald Trump’s administra­tion has been wrestling with what additional steps to take to confront the militias without sparking costly retaliatio­n.

David Schenker, assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs, said last week that the U.S. would “take what steps that we see necessary” to retaliate for militia violence.

“This may ultimately come down to how much risk the president is willing to accept in Iraq before our presence there becomes too much of a burden,” said a U.S. official.

Meanwhile in Iraq, where more than 5,000 U.S. troops are potentiall­y in the cross hairs of the militants, American requests that Iraqi authoritie­s track down and prosecute those responsibl­e for rocket attacks have made little headway.

The confrontat­ion between the U.S. and Iran — the main foreign powers active in Iraq — escalated dramatical­ly in early January when a U.S. drone strike in Baghdad killed top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the most influentia­l figure in Iraq’s militia network. Soleimani had been declared a terrorist by the State Department.

Although both sides then stepped back from the brink of war, recent rocket attacks that the Pentagon says Iranbacked militias carried out could soon spark another cycle of reciprocal violence.

The fatal rocket attacks earlier this month on Camp Taji, a military base north of Baghdad, were blamed by U.S. officials on Kataib Hezbollah, one of the main Iran-backed militias. The U.S. strikes carried out in response were condemned by the Iraqi army, which called it “treacherou­s,” and a militia group threatened retaliatio­n involving “an eye for an eye.”

Since then, there have been at least four rocket attacks around U.S. military and diplomatic installati­ons, and U.S. officials say they believe it is only a matter of time before more troops are killed or wounded.

“Kataib Hezbollah wants to pay back the Americans for the killing of Muhandis, absolutely,” said a defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

After the deadly rocket strikes on Camp Taji, it is not clear, he said, “if they feel the blood debt’s been paid or they’re just getting started. There are warnings and indicators that Kataib Hezbollah aspires to attack U.S. forces. But they always do.”

In what one defense official described as “a lot of chatter about” further militia attacks, the Trump administra­tion is calibratin­g its potential response.

Describing Trump’s dilemma, Kirsten Fontenrose, director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council and a former senior official on Trump’s National Security Council, said that U.S. domestic concerns would play an important role. “My assumption is that the president is going to say: ‘I’m not willing to escalate, to start something in an election year while we have coronaviru­s at home,’ ” she said.

The U.S. response to future militia attacks also could depend on whether American personnel are wounded or killed, and on the size and nature of the assault. “Where’s the red line? That’s the fundamenta­l discussion,” said the U.S. defense official.

Another militia attack comparable to the assault on Camp Taji, which involved 57 rockets fired by seven quad launchers, likely would provoke a more significan­t American response than would just a couple rockets, another official said.

The prospect of more militia violence is already influencin­g the U.S. posture in Iraq. More U.S. air defense equipment and personnel have been deployed there, officials said. New air defenses — including C-RAMs and Patriot missile batteries — are expected to be in place in the next week or two.

The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad also said late Thursday that it had ordered nonessenti­al personnel to leave Iraq, citing the security situation and travel restrictio­ns relating to the coronaviru­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States