Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Black worker wins $330,000 in race lawsuit

Jury: State finance agency discrimina­ted against her

- LINDA SATTER

In the first jury trial at Little Rock’s federal courthouse since the coronaviru­s pandemic halted business as usual, a jury has awarded more than $330,000 to a black Little Rock woman after finding she was racially discrimina­ted against at the state Department of Finance and Administra­tion, where she worked.

“I believe that as a result of the death of George Floyd, the nation’s conscience has been pricked, and I believe white America is starting to understand the racism African Americans have been facing,” the woman’s attorney, Austin Porter Jr., said Friday.

Porter said he believes the fallout after the death of the Minneapoli­s man at the hands of police “made the jury very receptive” to Doris Smith’s case.

A jury of seven white men, one white woman and four black women delivered a verdict Thursday afternoon, after four days of testimony and less than two hours of deliberati­on, on all three claims Smith, 51, brought in a lawsuit she first filed in 2017.

The jury found that the department racially discrimina­ted against her by failing to promote her to a pay grade equal to that of similarly situated white employees, retaliated against her for complainin­g about the discrepanc­y and then terminated her in 2018 because of her complaint of racial discrimina­tion.

They awarded her $223,333.81 in back pay and $108,000 to compensate her for mental anguish and humiliatio­n.

said he plans to file a motion within 10 days seeking her reinstatem­ent as well as monetary compensati­on for lost benefits and payment of her attorney’s fees and costs. At the time she was fired, Smith was paid an annual salary of $108,1000 as an administra­tor for the Office of Intergover­nmental Services.

The department was represente­d by the attorney general’s office. Amanda Priest, a spokeswoma­n for the office, said Friday that attorneys will discuss a possible appeal with department officials. The attorney general’s office declined to comment further on the case.

Smith, a certified public accountant, began working at the department as an internal auditor in April 2004. Porter said she was classified as an “exceptiona­lly well-qualified applicant.”

She was promoted five times, gradually becoming the highest-ranking black employee in her pay grade.

Porter said that in late 2016, when the state was studying a new pay plan, Smith learned from a white colleague who was also an administra­tor and shared her pay grade that they were being considered for a lower pay grade while other administra­tors in the Division of Management Services were being considered for a higher pay grade.

Smith “began to ask questions,” Porter said, and when she couldn’t get answers, filed a discrimina­tion complaint in February 2017 with the Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission.

An initial draft of a Senate bill for revising the state employee compensati­on plan to make a uniform classifica­tion system listed Smith’s position at a reduced pay scale until the EEOC notified the department of her discrimina­tion charge and management moved her position to the higher grade, he said.

Porter said management officials then began retaliatin­g against Smith by placing her at the bottom of her new pay grade while all but one of her white colleagues in the same pay grade were paid more, forcing her to file another discrimina­tion charge with the EEOC. He said Smith’s white colleague who also had initially faced lower pay was also eventually moved into the higher pay grade after complainin­g to her supervisor.

Porter accused Smith’s supervisor, Comptrolle­r Paul Louthian, of starting “a campaign to get rid of Ms. Smith” and to make her the “scapegoat” for the office’s difficulty in implementi­ng a grant program that she had successful­ly submitted for several years but that was resubmitte­d while she was out of the country on vacation and later needed modificati­ons.

He said Smith was fired April 3, 2018. at Louthian’s behest, “which was just two weeks after the EEOC closed its investigat­ion into Ms. Smith’s case and notified the agency.”

Porter said that in preparing for the lawsuit, he found that several black employees of the agency had been fired after complainin­g of race discrimina­tion but that white employees who complained of sex, age and disability discrimina­tion weren’t fired.

In court documents, attorneys representi­ng the department said Smith was fired “because she failed to carry out her job duties, acted insubordin­ately, and directed employees under her supervisio­n to act insubordin­ately.” They said she also “failed to provide the required documentat­ion” for the grant, and that was one reason the grant wasn’t initially approved.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States