Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

How Arkansas’ congressio­nal delegation voted

Here is how Arkansas’ U.S. senators and U.S. representa­tives voted on major roll call votes during the week that ended Friday.

-

VOTERAMA IN CONGRESS

HOUSE

Removing Confederat­e

statues from Capitol. Passed 305-113, a bill (HR7573) that would remove from the Capitol building a bust of former Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the author of the Dred Scott vs. Sandford ruling in 1857 that Blacks could not be citizens of the United States or sue in federal courts. The bill also would banish from the Capitol the statues or busts of Confederat­e and pro-slavery leaders, including Gen. Robert E. Lee, the Confederat­e commander; Jefferson Davis, the Confederac­y president and a U.S. senator and House member; John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, a U.S. vice president and senator; John C. Breckenrid­ge of Kentucky, a U.S. vice president and Confederat­e war secretary; former North Carolina Gov. Charles B. Aycock; and former Arkansas governor and U.S. Sen. James P. Clarke. Under the bill, the Taney bust on the Senate side of the Capitol would be replaced with one of Thurgood Marshall, the first Black Supreme Court justice. All removals would have to occur within 45 or 120 days, and the statues would be returned to their donor states. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said: “I am not for destroying any statue. … Put them where they can be studied. … But do not honor [these individual­s]. Do not glorify them. Take them out of this great schoolhous­e so that the people who visit here can be uplifted by what this country is all about.” Tom McClintock, R-Calif., said: “If we remove memorials to every person in this building who ever made a bad decision … this will be a very barren place, indeed. It is only by the bad things in our history that we can truly measure all of the good things in our history.” A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Rick Crawford (R) French Hill (R)

Steve Womack (R) Bruce Westerman (R)

Approving $741 billion for

military in 2021. Passed 295125, a $741 billion military budget (HR6395) for fiscal 2021 that includes $60 billion-plus for active-duty and retiree health care, a $1 billion fund for dealing with present and future pandemics, and hundreds of billions for weapons systems and personnel costs. In addition, the bill would require Confederat­e names to be removed from U.S. bases within one year; prohibit public display of the Confederat­e flag on military property; treat global warming as a national-security threat; combat foreign interferen­ce in U.S. elections; fund a 3% pay raise for uniformed personnel; expand programs for military victims of sexual assault; require a Pentagon report on alleged Russian bounty payments for the killing of U.S. troops in Afghanista­n, and provide Ukraine with $250 million for defending itself against Russian belligeren­ce. The bill would add a “violent extremism” article covering hate crimes and other offenses to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and install an inspector general to probe white supremacis­t activities in the armed forces, and review racial and ethnic disparitie­s in the administra­tion of military justice. A yes vote was to pass the bill. Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Prohibitin­g undergroun­d

nuclear testing. Approved 227179, denying funding of Trump administra­tion plans to possibly lift a 28-year moratorium on the undergroun­d testing of nuclear weapons. The amendment was added to HR6395 (above). Since 1992, federal weapons laboratori­es have used technologi­cal simulation­s and scientific probes to ensure the safety and potency of the nation’s aging nuclear arsenal. But a Senate version of next year’s military budget includes $10 million to prepare for a resumption of explosive undergroun­d testing that was common throughout the Cold War but outlawed for reasons having to do with arms control, and protecting public health and the environmen­t. Dina Titus, D-Nev., said: “Conducting an explosive nuclear test encourages our adversarie­s, like Russia and China, to do the same. There is no good reason to risk the restart of a global arms race, especially at a time when we have the technologi­cal advantage.” Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., said: “If this amendment becomes law, the United States loses the ability to ensure that we can test, if necessary, to ensure that our deterrent is reliable and, therefore, credible. That … emboldens our adversarie­s, and it undermines our allies’ faith in the nuclear umbrella.”

A yes vote was to adopt amendment.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Repairing national parks,

funding public lands. Passed 310-107, a bill (HR1957) that would authorize $9.5 billion over five years for repairing facilities at the National Park Service, other federal land agencies and Indian Education Service schools. In addition, the bill would permanentl­y require an annual budget of at least $900 million for the Land and Water Conservati­on Fund, which provides federal and non-federal agencies with revenue for acquiring undevelope­d land for conservati­on and recreation­al purposes. All funding in the bill would come from royalties from oil and gas drilling operations on federal property. The bill would set aside about $6.5 billion over five years for long-neglected repairs at scores of national parks and related properties, generating tens of thousands of private-sector jobs and halving the park service’s $12.5 billion backlog of unfunded maintenanc­e.

A yes vote was to send the bill to President Donald Trump for his signature.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Nullifying bans on Muslim-majority immigratio­n.

Passed 233-183, legislatio­n (HR2486; HR2214) that would nullify executive orders by Trump prohibitin­g permanent immigratio­n into the United States by residents of 12 named countries, many of which have Muslim-majority population­s. In addition, the bill would limit the ability of presidents to use Section 212(f) of the Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act to close American borders to immigrants who pose no threat to U.S. public safety or national security. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., called for an end to “discrimina­tory bans that send the repugnant message that our foundation­al values of freedom of religion and liberty and justice for all do not apply.” Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., credited Trump with “decisive action to help ensure the security of our immigratio­n programs and, thus, the safety of our country. Every time he does so, my Democratic friends cry foul.”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Ensuring legal counsel at

ports of entry. Passed 231-184, legislatio­n (HR2486; HR5581) that would ensure that lawful permanent residents and other holders of U.S. visas can obtain prompt access to counsel when they are held by Customs and Border Protection for screening at U.S. ports of entry lasting more than one hour.

Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said: “All this bill says is that if someone is held in secondary inspection for at least an hour, they must be given an opportunit­y to call counsel, to call other people, to call their brother-in-law, to call whoever, and to communicat­e.”

Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., said only 17 million of the 400 million people entering the United States each year receive secondary screening, and that permitting them “to consult with counsel or some other interested party will bring legitimate trade and travel to a grinding halt.” A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Crawford (R)

Hill (R)

Womack (R) Westerman (R)

SENATE

Approving $741 billion for

military in 2021. Approved 86-14, a $740.5 billion military budget for fiscal 2021 that includes $69 billion to fund combat operations overseas, and hundreds of billions for weapons, personnel and research and developmen­t. The bill (S4049) would authorize a 3% pay raise for uniformed personnel; prohibit U.S. troop deployment­s against Americans exercising their constituti­onal right to peaceably protest; and fund preparatio­ns for possibly ending the 1992 moratorium on undergroun­d nuclear testing. In addition, the bill would require the removal over three years of Confederat­e names from 10 Army bases named after officers who waged war against the United States, and from other U.S. military assets — including naval vessels — named in commemorat­ion of Confederat­e military figures or battlefiel­d prowess.

James Inhofe, R-Okla., said America needs “a credible military deterrent that tells Russia and China and anyone else who would do us harm: You just can’t win. We are going to win. We will beat you. … That is what this [bill] does.” Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said: “It has been more than 150 years since the end of the Civil War, but 10 U.S. Army posts around this country currently bear the names of officers of the Confederat­e States of America … who took up arms against the United States to defend slavery.”

A yes vote was to pass the bill. John Boozman (R)

Tom Cotton (R)

Outlawing transfer of military weapons to local police.

Failed 51-49 to reach 60 votes needed to adopt an amendment to S4049 (above) that would permanentl­y outlaw the U.S. military’s transfer of combat-level weapons and equipment to local police at no cost. The untransfer­able items would include bayonets, tear gas, tanks, armed drones, grenade launchers and explosives. But police department­s could continue to receive non-lethal items, such as highwater vehicles, cold-weather gear, computers, first-aid kits and flashlight­s under what is called the “1033 Program.”

Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said: “The last month has made clear that weapons of war don’t belong in police department­s. … We saw the terrifying images of police in military gear storming the streets, combat vehicles rumbling down city blocks, rounds and rounds of tear gas shot at peaceful protesters, frequently without warning and often unprovoked. … Our communitie­s are not battlefiel­ds. The American people are not enemy combatants.”

James Inhofe, R-Okla., called the program “an effective use of taxpayers’ money” which, since 1990, has recycled more than $7 billion worth of vehicles, desks, boots, computers and other items to local police. “This is military equipment that the military no longer needs and that these [localities] would be purchasing anyway. The equipment is always demilitari­zed so that it is appropriat­e for public-safety use.”

A yes vote was to adopt the amendment.

Boozman (R)

Cotton (R)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States