Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Abuse of pardons is nothing new

- STEPHEN MIHM

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) described President Donald Trump’s commutatio­n of Roger Stone’s sentence as “historic, unpreceden­ted corruption,” and many seem to agree. Yet a deep dive into history shows another president’s relentless campaign of pardons as far more destructiv­e to the nation at one of its most fragile moments.

Before 1860, presidents used the constituti­onal power to pardon and commute sentences sparingly. But like so much else in American history, the Civil War changed all that.

In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the so-called Proclamati­on of Amnesty and Reconstruc­tion. The order offered a full pardon to anyone who had joined the Confederat­e cause, save for a number of key exceptions: high-ranking officials and those who mistreated Black soldiers or their officers.

For Lincoln, this measure was less about pardons than underminin­g the Confederat­e war effort, offering amnesty in exchange for abandoning the secessioni­st, pro-slavery cause. Moreover, this was less a program than a tentative plan. Few took him up on the offer. In the end, Lincoln pardoned only 64 individual­s for secession-related crimes.

When Johnson became president after Lincoln’s assassinat­ion, he revived the idea as a way to re-integrate states on the losing side of the war. In May 1865, Johnson issued a far more sweeping proclamati­on of amnesty that aimed to restore the white men who participat­ed in the rebellion. With a single signature, he pardoned hundreds of thousands of people, but drew a line at those worth more than $20,000.

Those with more wealth were encouraged to apply directly to Johnson to clear their names. Otherwise, they could not acquire or transfer property or possess other economic rights. And, crucially, they could not participat­e in politics, much less hold political office.

Over the summer and fall of 1865, throngs of well-off Southern whites flocked to the White House to beseech Johnson for pardons. The more savvy of these applicants began hiring “pardon brokers” who had special access to the president.

Johnson soon began approving individual pardons with little regard for their merits, ultimately signing upward of 13,500 of them. As a result, many pardoned aristocrat­ic planters and politician­s who ruled in formerly Confederat­e states won the right to run for office in the next election.

Thanks to Johnson’s assistance, they soon found themselves once again in charge of local and state government­s. One of their first initiative­s was passing racist Black Codes, laws used to limit the movement of freed slaves so that they could be forced to labor for their former enslavers at low wages. At the same time, white vigilantes operating under the newly formed Ku Klux Klan began terrorizin­g black communitie­s.

Lincoln’s Republican­s, who envisioned the abolition of slavery as the first step in the full enfranchis­ement of African Americans, were outraged. The minister and reformer Thomas Wentworth Higginson spoke for many when he wrote: “What most men mean today by the ‘president’s plan of reconstruc­tion’ is the pardon of every rebel for the crime of rebellion, and the utter refusal to pardon a single Black loyalist for the ‘crime’ of being Black.”

Johnson’s use of the pardon power became a matter of growing concern. What had begun as a practical attempt to reconstruc­t the South soon became a brutally effective political weapon, with Johnson repeatedly siding with white Southerner­s. Indeed, Johnson was a white supremacis­t who had no interest in helping the freed slaves, vetoing legislatio­n aimed at protecting them.

Radical Republican­s in Congress fought back, passing legislatio­n designed to wrest control over Reconstruc­tion from Johnson. They passed the Civil Rights Bill in 1865 (and overrode Johnson’s veto), giving blacks equal rights with whites and creating the Freedmen’s Bureau.

Johnson’s attempts to undermine the Republican vision of Reconstruc­tion—and his willingnes­s to pardon people en masse—eventually led to his impeachmen­t in 1868. Johnson emerged from this much weakened, as Congress took control of the policy toward the former Confederac­y. But he wasn’t done using the pardon power to re-enfranchis­e the former rebels.

On Christmas Day in 1868, just before leaving office, Johnson issued a universal amnesty for every single treasonous Confederat­e, effectivel­y pardoning those exempted from his earlier edicts. In the end, his pardons would expunge the crime of treason from the record of millions of Americans.

The only exceptions that remained were a handful of high-level Confederat­es who could not fully enjoy the benefits of this general proclamati­on because the 14th Amendment forbade former Confederat­e officials like Jefferson Davis from holding office without a special vote of Congress.

Davis never applied for a full pardon. As he quipped in 1884, “‘Tis been said that I should apply to the United States for a pardon, but repentance must precede the right of pardon, and I have not repented.”

The same could be said of Johnson, who went to his grave convinced of the righteousn­ess of his pardoning power. The verdict of history, though, has been far harsher: Johnson remains one of the most reviled presidents of all times, rightly blamed for restoring a bunch of treasonous white supremacis­ts to political power, and underminin­g the nation’s formative attempt at pursuing racial equality in the immediate wake of emancipati­on.

It may be small consolatio­n now, but when it comes to pardoning, Donald Trump is focused on helping the people closest to him. Let’s hope it stays that way.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States