Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Eureka Springs voters to see double on outdoor district

- BILL BOWDEN

Voters in Eureka Springs will decide on Nov. 3 whether they want a permanent entertainm­ent district.

But they may think they’re seeing double when they look at the ballot.

There will be two questions regarding entertainm­ent districts on the general election ballot in Eureka Springs, Mayor Robert “Butch” Berry said.

The first one, brought about by a petition for referendum last spring, will be for a “permanent entertainm­ent district with a sunset clause.” In that case, the sunset clause caused the “permanent” entertainm­ent district to expire in September, Berry told City Council members at a meeting Monday night.

The second question on the ballot will be whether Eureka Springs should have a permanent entertainm­ent district. Period.

The City Council decided to put the second question on the ballot to clear up any confusion that could be caused by the first one.

“This gives the voters an opportunit­y to decide once and for all whether or not they want to have an entertainm­ent or arts and outdoor dining ordinance,” Berry said at Monday’s City Council meeting.

“I think this is a great idea,” said Melissa Greene, a council member. “This doesn’t mean any of us are supporting or non-supporting of it. I think our citizens have a right to decide this.”

Ordinance 2297, putting the issue on the ballot, passed unanimousl­y Monday night.

Armstrong said the ballot wording will be: “An election to refer the issue of allowing use of the Act 812 of 2019 of the Arkansas Legislatur­e to create a permanent entertainm­ent district in Eureka Springs, Arkansas.”

In February, the council passed Ordinance 2292 — which created a permanent entertainm­ent district. But they included a sunset clause so the entertainm­ent district would end and the issue could be revisited later if all went well.

Eureka Springs, population 2,073, relies on tourism.

The idea of an entertainm­ent district in Eureka Springs has been hotly debated for months.

“You’re talking about death, mayhem and expense,” Mickey Schneider told other Eureka Springs City Council members at a meeting last year. “This whole entertainm­ent district thing is so wrong for Eureka it’s pathetic and unbelievab­le that it’s gotten this far.”

Schneider said the families with children wouldn’t want to come to downtown Eureka Springs if people were drinking in the street. Ordinance 2292 allowed consumptio­n of alcohol outdoors on downtown city streets at specific times each week.

A petition drive commenced last spring to stop the entertainm­ent district until November, when people could vote on it during the general election. The petition basically puts Ordinance 2292 before the voters in November.

A total of 192 signatures were collected, and 177 of them were certified, said City Clerk Ann Armstrong. The number of valid signatures needed was 146.

The entertainm­ent district operated for three days in March before the signatures were certified, which happened at about the same time that Gov. Asa Hutchinson ordered the closing of indoor service at bars and restaurant­s because of covid-19.

The entertainm­ent district was officially on hold until the November general election.

While the idea of a permanent entertainm­ent district has been contentiou­s, the city often allows temporary entertainm­ent districts during festivals.

“There were a lot of people in town who just wanted an answer, and I think that’s fair just to answer it once and for all,” council member Susan Harman said Tuesday. “Personally I don’t care if they vote yes or no, I just want them to vote. … We’re looking forward to seeing what that vote comes out to be. It just gives us an opportunit­y to have a clear vote and a clear directive from the citizens.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States