Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Won’t prosecute abortion, asserts 64 officials’ letter

Post-Roe restrictio­ns would re-injure victims, they declare

- TOM JACKMAN

A coalition of more than 60 state prosecutor­s and attorneys general from across the country declared Wednesday that they would not enforce laws that criminaliz­e abortion, even if the Supreme Court overturns the 1973 decision that legalized it nationwide.

The declaratio­n was made as Supreme Court confirmati­on hearings go on for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a conservati­ve who some believe would vote to reverse Roe v.

Wade if elevated to the high court. Barrett has declined to say how she would vote if a challenge to Roe comes before the court.

The prosecutor­s’ statement invokes the power of prosecutor­ial discretion, which many reform-minded prosecutor­s have used to reduce or eliminate prosecutio­n of marijuana charges and other misdemeano­rs to reduce what they say is the disproport­ionate harm they can cause to nonviolent offenders.

At least 12 states have passed anti-abortion laws since last year, calling for criminal charges against either the women who have abortions, doctors who perform them, or both, according to Fair and Just Prosecutio­n, the group which organized the statement.

Included in the statement was a reference to Arkansas. “In the midst of the global pandemic, the state of Arkansas moved to ban abortion procedures during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic by labeling abortion care as nonessenti­al.” It didn’t appear that any Arkansas officials signed the statement.

Among the prosecutor­s who signed Wednesday’s statement are Danny Carr of Jefferson County, Ala., whose state Legislatur­e passed a law imposing minimum prison sentences of 10 years on any doctor who performs an abortion under nearly every circumstan­ce, and Glenn Funk of Nashville, Tenn., whose state passed a “heartbeat” law imposing restrictio­ns on abortions performed as early as six weeks. Federal courts have temporaril­y blocked the laws in Alabama and Tennessee, but anti-abortion groups are appealing.

“It is imperative,” the prosecutor­s declared in their statement, “that we use our discretion to decline to prosecute personal health care choices criminaliz­ed under such laws.” Citing the 47 years of legal precedent establishe­d by

Roe, the prosecutor­s said that “women have a right to make decisions about their own medical care including, but not limited to, seeking an abortion.”

The statement was signed by 11 attorneys general, including Xavier Becerra of California, Kwame Raoul of Illinois, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvan­ia and Karl Racine of D.C., all elected Democrats. Fifty-three city and county prosecutor­s also signed the statement, including Cyrus Vance Jr. of New York, Kim Foxx of Chicago, Chesa Boudin of San Francisco and Larry Krasner of Philadelph­ia.

One of the chief objections to the anti-abortion laws that prosecutor­s cited is that many do not create exceptions for women seeking abortions due to child molestatio­n, rape, incest, human traffickin­g or domestic violence. They said that criminaliz­ing abortion will discourage such victims from reporting the crimes.

“Laws that revictimiz­e and retraumati­ze victims are unconscion­able,” the prosecutor­s said. “Keeping communitie­s safe inherently requires promoting trust, which would be deeply eroded by the enforcemen­t of these laws.”

Last year, Georgia passed a law giving district attorneys the discretion to file charges against “anyone and everyone involved in performing and

The statement was signed by 11 attorneys general, including Xavier Becerra of California, Kwame Raoul of Illinois, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvan­ia and Karl Racine of D.C., all elected Democrats.

assisting with an abortion,” Fair and Just Prosecutio­n said. Three Georgia prosecutor­s — Paul Howard of Atlanta, David Cooke of Macon County and Sherry Boston of DeKalb County — signed the declaratio­n that they would not enforce such laws.

A federal court in Georgia struck down the anti-abortion law there in July, but the governor said the state would appeal.

“These laws not only fail to consider the needs of victims,” Boston said in a news release, “but they could actually harm public safety by spending prosecutor­ial resources on the victim or the profession­als who provided them with needed and appropriat­e care, rather than on the perpetrato­rs of child molestatio­n, rape, incest, human traffickin­g or domestic violence.”

The prosecutor­s’ statement said they believe many of the new anti-abortion laws are unconstitu­tional under Roe, but their decision not to prosecute abortions “would hold even if the protection­s of Roe v. Wade were to be eroded or overturned.”

Miriam Krinsky, executive director of Fair and Just Prosecutio­n, said that “elected prosecutor­s have the opportunit­y to lead and to offer peace of mind to women and health care profession­als who might otherwise be placed in the untenable position of choosing between the exercise of personal health care choices and the threat of criminal prosecutio­n.”

In the Washington area, Virginia prosecutor­s in Prince George’s, Fairfax, Arlington and Loudoun counties, along with the city of Alexandria, all joined the statement. Prosecutor­s in Maryland’s Montgomery and Prince William counties did not.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States