Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Cases against Whitmer plot suspects to advance

U.S. magistrate judge rules that all 5 Michigan men will remain in jail without bail

- DAVID EGGERT AND KATHLEEN FOODY Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by John Flesher of The Associated Press.

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — Prosecutor­s provided enough evidence to move toward trial for five Michigan men accused of plotting to kidnap the state’s governor, and they will all remain held without bail, a federal magistrate judge ruled Friday.

A two-day preliminar­y hearing in Grand Rapids this week featured testimony by one of the FBI agents who ran the investigat­ion, relying on confidenti­al informants and undercover agents to thwart the purported scheme to abduct Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Sally Berens said the five men’s cases can go to a grand jury, which will determine whether to issue indictment­s. That is required for them to face trial.

Berens also ruled after a Friday bail hearing that Ty Garbin will remain in custody along with Adam Fox, who waived his right to a hearing. Berens on Tuesday denied bail for the three other Michigan residents charged in the case: Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta.

A sixth man, Barry Croft, was separately ordered on Tuesday to be transferre­d to Michigan from his home state of Delaware.

Authoritie­s allege members of two anti-government paramilita­ry groups took part in plotting the kidnapping of Whitmer. Six men, led by Fox of the “Michigan III%ers,” are charged in federal court. Eight others are believed to be members or associates of a group called the Wolverine Watchmen and are charged in state court with counts including providing material support for terrorist acts.

The federal preliminar­y hearing began Tuesday and wrapped up Friday. Agent Richard Trask testified that members of anti-government paramilita­ry groups from several states discussed abducting Whitmer or Virginia Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam during a June meeting in Ohio.

Fox and Croft were among those who attended that session, according to testimony and court documents. But it was not clear if talk of targeting Northam went beyond that meeting, and nothing from the complaint or Trask’s testimony indicated that anyone had been charged with a plot involving Northam.

The men could get up to life in prison if convicted.

Several of their defense attorneys implied during questionin­g that their clients were “big talkers” who did not intend to follow through with action.

“It’s loose talk,” Scott Graham, an attorney for Franks, said. “And again, the point is: What has been done to show you that there was an actual agreement?”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nils Kessler, though, argued that the group demonstrat­ed their discussion­s were serious by taking steps to keep them secret, including using encrypted chat tools. Authoritie­s found conversati­ons among group members in which they were worried that federal authoritie­s had infiltrate­d their planning sessions, he said.

Some of them also participat­ed in surveillan­ce of Whitmer’s northern Michigan home, Kessler said, rejecting defense attorneys’ implicatio­n that the men participat­ed in paramilita­ry group exercises without a specific plan for using those techniques.

“You’re crossing a pretty serious line when you go in the middle of the night in multiple cars and stage up at a gas station and … you go to the house of the sitting governor of the state to go surveil their house at night,” Kessler said.

Berens agreed, saying prosecutor­s didn’t have to show the men “signed on a dotted line” at this stage of their case.

A preliminar­y hearing is sometimes described as a mini-trial but requires a lower standard of proof — probable cause — than a criminal trial. Berens found that the informatio­n presented showed the men had a unified purpose — to kidnap Whitmer — allowing the case to move forward.

“The fact that [the plan] was likely to be unsuccessf­ul or difficult to accomplish” isn’t relevant, she said.

Douglas Parker, the attorney for Harris, said outside the courthouse that he disagreed with the judge’s decision.

“There were a bunch of questions that are still unknown by the hearing, and we’re going to have to see where the evidence goes,” Parker said. “All I’d say is: Keep an open mind.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States