Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Social media CEOs to testify before Congress about election

- MARCY GORDON Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Barbara Ortutay of The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — The CEOs of Facebook and Twitter are being summoned before Congress to defend their handling of disinforma­tion in the 2020 presidenti­al election, even as lawmakers questionin­g them are deeply divided over the election’s integrity and results.

Prominent Republican senators have refused to speak out against President Donald Trump’s claims of voting irregulari­ties and fraud, even as informatio­n disputing election results has flourished online.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a close Trump ally who heads the Senate Judiciary Committee to which the CEOs will testify today, has publicly urged, “Do not concede, Mr. President. Fight hard.”

Both Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey promised lawmakers last month that they would aggressive­ly guard their platforms from being manipulate­d by foreign government­s or used to incite violence around the election results — and they followed through with high-profile steps that angered Trump and his supporters.

Twitter and Facebook have both slapped a misinforma­tion label on some content from Trump, most notably his assertions linking voting by mail to fraud. On Monday, Twitter flagged Trump’s tweet proclaimin­g “I won the Election!” with this note: “Official sources called this election differentl­y.”

Facebook also moved two days after the election to ban a large group called “Stop the Steal” that Trump supporters were using to organize protests against the vote count. The 350,000-member group echoed Trump’s allegation­s of a rigged election rendering the results invalid.

For days after the election as the vote counting went on, copycat “Stop the Steal” groups were easily found on Facebook, with one nearing 12,000 members as of last week. As of Monday, Facebook appeared to have made them harder to find, though it was still possible to locate them, including some groups with thousands of members.

Facebook didn’t immediatel­y respond to a request for informatio­n on its specific actions currently toward such groups.

Warily eyeing how the companies wield their power to filter speech and ideas, Trump and the Republican­s accuse the social media companies of anti-conservati­ve bias. Democrats also criticize them, though for different reasons. The result is that both parties are interested in stripping away some of the protection­s that have shielded tech companies from legal responsibi­lity for what people post on their platforms. Biden has heartily endorsed such an action.

But it’s the actions that companies have taken around the election that are likely to be a dominant focus at today’s hearing.

The GOP majority on the Judiciary panel threatened Zuckerberg and Dorsey with subpoenas last month if they didn’t agree to voluntaril­y testify for today’s hearing. Republican­s on the Senate Commerce Committee lambasted the two CEOs and Sundar Pichai, Google’s chief executive, at a hearing last month for what they said was a pattern of silencing conservati­ve viewpoints while giving free rein to political actors from countries like China and Iran.

Despite fears over security in the run-up to Nov. 3 and social media companies bracing for the worst, the election turned out to be the most secure in U.S. history, federal and state officials from both parties say — repudiatin­g Trump’s unsubstant­iated claims of fraud.

Facebook insists that it has learned its lesson from the 2016 election and is no longer a conduit for misinforma­tion, voter suppressio­n and election disruption. This fall, Facebook said it removed a small network of accounts and pages linked to Russia’s Internet Research Agency, the “troll factory” that has used social media accounts to sow political discord in the U.S. since the 2016 election. Twitter suspended five related accounts.

But critical outsiders, as well as some of Facebook’s own employees, say the company’s efforts to tighten its safeguards remain insufficie­nt, despite it having spent billions.

“Facebook only acts if they feel there’s a threat to their reputation or their bottom line,” says Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate. The organizati­on had pressed Facebook to take down the “Stop the Steal” group.

There’s no evidence that the social media giants are biased against conservati­ve news, posts or other material, or that they favor one side of political debate over another, researcher­s have found. But criticism of the companies’ policies, and their handling of disinforma­tion tied to the election, has come from Democrats as well as Republican­s.

Democrats have focused their criticism mainly on hate speech, misinforma­tion and other content that can incite violence, keep people from voting or spread falsehoods about the coronaviru­s. They criticize the tech CEOs for failing to police content, blaming the platforms for playing a role in hate crimes and the rise of white nationalis­m in the U.S. And that criticism has extended to their efforts to stamp out false informatio­n related to the election.

If you thought disinforma­tion on Facebook was a problem during our election, just wait until you see how it is shredding the fabric of our democracy in the days after,” tweeted Bill Russo, a spokesman for Democrat Joe Biden.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States