Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Greene presents both GOP tradition, future

- Jennifer Senior writes for The New York Times. By Jennifer Senior

When I was coming of age as a journalist, it was an article of faith — and political science — that female Republican politician­s subdued their party’s excesses. It was a measurable phenomenon, even. Republican women voted to the left of their male counterpar­ts in Congress.

But as the GOP began to radicalize, becoming not just a small-government party but an anti-government party — a government delegitimi­zation party — this taming effect ceased to be. Moderates of both sexes cleared out of the building. A new swarm of firebrands rushed in. Not only did female Republican elected officials become every bit as conservati­ve as their male counterpar­ts; they began, in some cases, to personify the party’s most outlandish tendencies.

This is the thought I keep returning to when I think about Marjorie Taylor Greene: That there is something depressing­ly familiar about her. She is the latest descendant in a lineage of Republican women who embrace a boffo radicalism, who delight in making trouble and in causing offense. In her own freshman class, Greene has an outrageous comrade in Lauren Boebert, who once said she hoped that QAnon was real and tried, post Jan. 6, to walk onto the House floor with her Glock.

Before Greene and Boebert, there was Rep. Marsha Blackburn, now a senator, who declared a preference for the title “Congressma­n” and co-sponsored a 2009 bill requiring presidenti­al candidates to provide copies of their original birth certificat­es. There was Rep. Michele Bachmann, who went on national television and repeated a story about the HPV vaccine supposedly causing “mental retardatio­n” and openly fretted that President Barack Obama wanted to do away with the dollar.

There was Sarah Palin, who spellbound the base with her vaudevilli­an ad-libbing, sassy anti-intellectu­alism, denunciati­ons of the lamestream media and laffy-taffy stretching of the facts.

You could argue that these women were in a better position to embody anti-government, populist sentiment than men. A decade ago, Republican pollster Linda DiVall told The Atlantic that voters were more inclined to think female politician­s “won’t be in the back room dealing with special interests.”

Now recall Palin at the 2008 convention, railing in her Wasilla twang against “the good-old boys” brokering their secret deals. Recall Bachmann in 2011, telling Jake Tapper, “What people see in me is that I’m a real person, I’m authentic.” And think of Greene in these past couple of years, yammering on about the nefarious plots of the deep state, Jewish lasers and false flags. She is here to tell you what is going on in that back room — and that she is going to put an end to it.

After the 2018 midterm elections, when 10 Republican congresswo­men lost their seats, New York’s Elise Stefanik (once a reasonable human being, now another Harvard Graduate for Sedition) told Republican leaders that the party had to make electing women a priority. Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, agreed to help; outside groups and Stefanik’s own PAC did, too. Their efforts worked. Eighteen new Republican women showed up to the House in January.

But in order to get elected, those women needed to win their primaries. And to win their primaries, they needed to present themselves as every bit as tough and conservati­ve (socially and otherwise) as their male primary opponents — and to win over a subgroup of the electorate that historical­ly has been less inclined to vote for women in the first place.

This, in turn, led to what I think is an interestin­g paradox: These women are playing simultaneo­usly into male Republican stereotype­s of power — loving their guns, defending their country from the migrant hordes —

and stereotype­s of femininity, to reassure the Republican faithful that they are still real women. Think of Palin, presenting herself as a mama grizzly with a shotgun.

Greene loves her guns, too — so much that she was willing to harass a survivor of a school shooting, which may not have qualified as maternal behavior, now that I think of it.

Hmm. Maybe we have rounded a corner. Maybe any kind of behavior from Republican female politician­s now goes.

Either way, a number of these politician­s, including Palin and Bachmann, crashed and burned. But what if their evanescent political lives paved the way for more powerful male politician­s?

Corrine McConnaugh­y, a research scholar in politics at Princeton, stopped me in my tracks by asking whether Palin’s repeated complaints about the elite media made it easier for Donald Trump to frame himself as a victim of Fake News. Better for a woman to blaze the way on victimhood first, right, lest it be seen as unmanly? (Yes, Nixon also complained that the media were out to get him. But mainly in private.) McConnaugh­y didn’t know the answer. Neither do I. But it is a great question.

Perhaps the media bear a tiny bit of responsibi­lity for the coverage that Greene is getting. We are going through terrible outrage withdrawal. So here is Greene, offering us a bottomless Mary-Poppins-carpet-bag of old videos that spew hate and derangemen­t. She is our methadone.

Then again, she truly is monstrous.

You can also ask whether unconsciou­s gender bias plays a role in the coverage of Greene. Television loves a brassy hot mess. Greene’s despicable words and actions deserved censure and punishment, certainly. But it is not as if there aren’t a ton of male Republican kooks in this Congress, too: Louie Gohmert, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, Mo Brooks … the list is long.

Me, I remain fixated on the new breed of Republican female politician that Greene continues to represent. As political scientists Monica C. Schneider and Angela L. Bos have argued, we don’t yet have, as a culture, a firm idea of how a female elected official looks or acts, though we have stereotype­s galore for male politician­s (and men and women more generally).

Hillary Clinton’s supporters were fond of the adage, “the future is female.” That may one day be true. But we should brace ourselves. That future may be quite different from the one we were expecting. The future often is.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States