Texas says U.S. agency nearly freed sex offenders
AUSTIN, Texas — The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency was prepared to release three men convicted of sex offenses against children, Texas officials said, in an apparent misapplication by authorities of enforcement directives from President Joe Biden’s administration.
The three were not released after discussions in recent weeks between the state prison system and immigration authorities. But the process of keeping them in custody raised alarms that the agency was declining to detain convicts contrary to immigration law, officials said.
The agency has dropped “detainer” requests against 26 people in Texas in recent weeks, said Jason Clark, chief of staff at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Immigration authorities issue detainers to local or state law enforcement agencies holding a person who is potentially in the U.S. illegally. When a person in the U.S. illegally completes a sentence for a crime, the immigration enforcement agency can seek to take the person into immigration custody.
In previous years, including under the administrations of Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump, the agency would not drop that many detainers from the Texas prison system in a year, Clark said.
Most of the 26 were convicted of drug charges or drunken-driving offenses, according to state records obtained by The Associated Press. But two were convicted of sexually assaulting a teenager and a third was convicted of indecency with a child.
“Our concern is that you have individuals that have offenses in which we believe they would pose a public safety threat,” Clark said. “And so dropping the detainer, in turn, is threatening public safety and we expressed that to immigration officials.”
On Biden’s first day in office, the Department of Homeland Security issued a memorandum directing immigration agencies to focus their enforcement efforts on three categories: threats to national security, threats to public safety, and migrants who entered the U.S. illegally on or after Nov. 1. The memorandum was a departure from practice during Trump’s administration in which immigration agencies were given wide latitude on who to arrest, detain, and deport.
But people convicted of sex offenses against minors still qualify for enforcement. The memorandum defines public-safety threats as incarcerated people “who have been convicted of an ‘aggravated felony’” as defined by a specific section of immigration law. That section begins: “The term aggravated felony means … murder, rape, or sexual abuse of a minor.”
Steve Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell University, said a conviction for sexual abuse of a minor would normally qualify as an “aggravated felony,” and that “such individuals remain immigration enforcement priorities.”
Word of the impending release of one of the men led Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to tweet on Feb. 5 that “Biden’s immigration policy is threatening safety in Texas.” The Republican governor’s widely viewed post alleged that a prisoner convicted of child sex assault should have been transferred to immigration custody, but “Biden is releasing him into our community.”
The man to whom Abbott was referring, Jose Lara-Lopez, was transferred directly from the state prison system to the immigration agency on Tuesday. He pleaded guilty two years ago in Houston to sexually assaulting a teenager.
An Abbott spokesperson said in a statement: “Last Friday, the Governor was alerted to [the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency’s] intention not to uphold [a] detainer under federal law. We are happy that [the agency] decided to change course and put our communities’ safety and our nation’s laws first.”
Juan Marroquin Vega, convicted of indecency with a child, also was transferred to immigration custody, Texas officials said. Luis Manuel Almanza, who was convicted of sexually assaulting a teenager, had his parole approval rescinded after the immigration agency dropped the detainer against him, and is now set to remain in prison for at least another year, according to the state.
The agency declined to comment Friday on whether it had initially dropped detainers on the men convicted of sex crimes. In a statement, the agency said it “makes arrest and custody determinations on a case-by-case basis, based on the totality of the circumstances and does so in compliance with federal law and agency policy.”
Civil-rights groups have criticized the use of detainers as violating due-process rights and noted that the immigration agency has at times wrongly placed detainers on U.S. citizens. Texas’ Republican-led Legislature passed a law in 2017 requiring local and state law enforcement officials to comply with detainer requests.