Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Land of wind and lies

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics, writes for the New York Times.

Politician­s are neither gods nor saints. Because they aren’t gods, they often make bad policy decisions. Because they aren’t saints, they often try to evade responsibi­lity for their failures, asserting that they did as well as anyone could have or that someone else deserves the blame.

For a while, then, the politics surroundin­g the power outages that have spread across Texas looked fairly normal. True, the state’s leaders pursued reckless policies that set the stage for catastroph­e, then tried to evade responsibi­lity. But while their behavior was reprehensi­ble, it was reprehensi­ble in ways we’ve seen many times over the years.

However, that changed around a day after the severity of the disaster became apparent. Republican politician­s and right-wing media, not content with run-of-the-mill blame-shifting, have coalesced around a malicious falsehood instead: the claim that wind and solar power caused the collapse of the Texas power grid, and that radical environmen­talists are somehow responsibl­e for the fact that millions of people are freezing in the dark, even though conservati­ve Republican­s have run the state for a generation.

This isn’t normal political malfeasanc­e. It’s the energy-policy equivalent of claiming that the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on was a false-flag antifa operation—raw denial of reality, not just to escape accountabi­lity, but to demonize one’s opponents. And it’s another indicator of the moral and intellectu­al collapse of American conservati­sm.

The underlying story of what happened in Texas appears to be fairly clear. Like many states, Texas has a partly deregulate­d electricit­y market, but deregulati­on has gone further there than elsewhere.

Texas authoritie­s also ignored warnings about the risks associated with extreme cold. After a 2011 cold snap left millions of Texans in the dark, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission urged the state to winterize its power plants with insulation, heat pipes and other measures. But Texas, which has deliberate­ly cut its power grid off from the rest of the country precisely to exempt itself from federal regulation, only partially implemente­d the recommenda­tions. And the deep freeze came.

A power grid poorly prepared to deal with extreme cold suffered multiple points of failure. The biggest problems appear to have come in the delivery of natural gas, which normally supplies most of the state’s winter electricit­y, as wellheads and pipelines froze.

Nor was this merely a matter of the lights going out; people are freezing too, because many Texas homes have electric heat. Many of the homes without electrical heat rely on natural gas. We’re looking at enormous suffering, and probably a significan­t death toll.

So Texas is experienci­ng a natural disaster made significan­tly worse by major policy errors—and the officials who made those errors should be held accountabl­e. Instead of accepting responsibi­lity, however, officials from Gov. Greg Abbott on down, backed by virtually the entire right-wing media complex, have chosen to lay the blame on green energy, especially wind power.

It’s true that the state generates a lot of electricit­y from wind, although it’s a small fraction of the total. But that’s not because Texas—Texas!—is run by environmen­tal crazies. It’s because these days wind turbines are a cost-effective energy source wherever there’s a lot of wind, and one thing Texas has is a lot of wind.

It’s also true that extreme cold forced some of the state’s insufficie­ntly winterized wind turbines to shut down, but this was happening to Texas energy sources across the board, with the worst problems involving natural gas.

Why, then, the all-out effort to falsely place the blame on wind power?

The incentives are obvious. Attacking wind power is a way for both elected officials and free-market ideologues to dodge responsibi­lity for botched deregulati­on. It’s a way to please fossil fuel interests, which give the vast bulk of their political contributi­ons to Republican­s. Since progressiv­es tend to favor renewable energy, it’s a way to own the libs. And it all dovetails with climate change denial.

But why do they think they can get away with such an obvious lie? The answer is that those peddling the lie know that they’re operating in a post-truth political landscape. When two-thirds of Republican­s believe that antifa was involved in the assault on the Capitol, selling the base a bogus narrative about the Texas electricit­y disaster is practicall­y child’s play.

And if you’re expecting any change in the policies that helped cause this disaster, don’t count on it—at least as long as Texas remains Republican. Given everything else we’ve seen, the best bet is that demonizati­on of wind power, not a realistic understand­ing of what actually happened, will rule policy going forward.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States