Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Time’s running out for bubble teams

-

It’s always a good idea for an NCAA Tournament at-large candidate to have some notable victories to hang its hat on. A boatload of wins is nice, but quality victories usually rule the day with the tournament selection committee.

Wichita State (13-4) held a fairly forgettabl­e profile until Thursday. The Shockers had done nothing wrong but also nothing remarkable. Their best performanc­e was a Jan. 2 victory at Mississipp­i, a result that’s grown in value this month.

Then came a 68-63 victory over No. 6 Houston, and Wichita State finds itself squarely in the NCAA Tournament conversati­on.

There are other teams like the Shockers. Some are from just outside the power conference­s, in the American, Atlantic 10 and Mountain West, with limited opportunit­ies to significan­tly improve their at-large chances. Others are in power leagues and need to get working soon.

And time’s ticking. Selection Sunday is barely three weeks away.

SAN DIEGO STATE (16-4)

The No. 25 Aztecs are in better shape than anyone else included in this discussion, and they’ve won seven in a row since getting swept by Utah State. They’re more of a metrics darling than any of the other Mountain West at-large contenders (Boise State, Colorado State and Utah State) and might be able to get away with not having a Quadrant 1 triumph. They’d be wise not to give away too many games down the stretch.

VA. COMMONWEAL­TH (16-4)

Another team on a winning streak, the Rams have taken six in a row and close out the month against George Mason, Saint Louis and Davidson. The latter two games could be of some value, and piling up Quadrant 2 will help.

SAINT LOUIS (11-3)

The Billikens have a fine nonconfere­nce triumph (LSU) but sputtered after losing nearly all of January to a covid pause. They had won four in a row before a loss Friday at Dayton. And they have a critical week against VCU and Richmond up next. Travis Ford’s bunch will be difficult to fully evaluate, but they’d be well-served picking off at least one of those two teams.

LOUISVILLE (11-4)

It’s hard for a team with modest high-end accomplish­ments to be viewed as favorably as the Cardinals. They did top Virginia Tech, Seton Hall and Duke (all at home), and the 7-0 mark against Quadrant 2 is a welcome sight.

SYRACUSE (12-6)

Syracuse has one victory over a likely at-large team (Virginia Tech at home), plus a couple more against serious one-bid league contenders (Bryant and Northeaste­rn). That … isn’t going to get it done.

NORTH CAROLINA (13-7)

A closing stretch against Louisville, No. 16 Florida State, Syracuse and Duke provides opportunit­ies. Nonetheles­s, the Tar Heels’ hand isn’t especially strong; its most notable triumphs came at Duke, against Pac-12 bubbler Stanford on a neutral floor and at home against Syracuse.

SMU (11-4)

The Mustangs can’t follow the Wichita State path to at-large contention because they’ve already been swept by Houston (though a conference tournament meeting is possible). But they do get two games against the Shockers before the end of the month … assuming they actually play those games. SMU, which won at Dayton and split with Memphis for its most notable victories, hasn’t played since Feb. 8 because of a pause.

MEMPHIS (12-6)

Unlike SMU, the Tigers can adopt the Wichita State playbook, as they close the regular season at home against Houston. That doesn’t solve another problem: A lack of consequent­ial success away from home. Memphis’ best outcomes are home defeats of SMU and Wichita State and a neutral-site romp over Saint Mary’s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States