Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Official: Housing authority mended

Audits’ red flags fixed, he declares

-

Auditors regularly raised concerns about the management of the Metropolit­an Housing Alliance, Little Rock’s federally funded public housing authority, in annual reviews during the 2010s, but the authority said the issues have been rectified.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette obtained the required yearly audits of the authority’s management and finances from 2011-18 through a public-records request, and they showed a range of potential management problems with both the public housing and Section 8 voucher programs.

Problems involved ensuring tenant eligibilit­y, inspecting units and selecting housing applicants in the right order from the public housing waiting list.

Kenyon Lowe, the chairman of the housing authority’s board of commission­ers and the only person authorized to speak for the agency, said these issues have been resolved thanks to updated technology, continuous staff training and changes in leadership.

“My position has always

been that there should be some type of routine training going on to keep up with the Code of Federal Regulation­s and any changes that [the federal housing department] does,” Lowe said.

The 2019 and 2020 audits are still in progress, with the deadline for the former extended because of covid-19. BKD, a Little Rock accounting firm, conducted the audits from 2012-18. The Reznick Group, with offices in California and Washington, D.C., conducted the 2011 audit.

The annual audits are required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t.

The Metropolit­an Housing Authority oversees about 900 traditiona­l public housing units, 200 affordable housing units and 160 market-rate units. It also administer­s more than 2,000 Section 8 housing choice vouchers. It provides housing assistance to about 8,000 people.

Public housing is available for rent below the market rate based on income level, while Section 8 vouchers allow recipients to choose their own residences within a housing authority’s jurisdicti­on. The housing authority does not always own units occupied by Section 8 recipients, but it always owns public housing units.

Not all of the public housing units in 2011 were the same in 2018. The Metropolit­an Housing Alliance started converting some public housing to Section 8 housing in 2017 and 2018, according to the audits.

The housing authority has seen four new executive directors since 2018. Former executive director Rodney Forte resigned in November 2018 after six years in the position. Marshall Nash then served as interim executive director for five months. Anthony Snell was the next interim director for six months before he was officially hired into the position, and he left nine months later, in July 2020.

Nadine Jarmon, the interim executive director since Snell’s departure, will take over as the new executive director Monday.

PUBLIC HOUSING

The federal Housing Department issues Public Housing Assessment System scores every year after housing authoritie­s have submitted the previous year’s audit. The total score of 100 possible points is comprised of 40 maximum points for the physical condition of public housing, 25 points for the financial condition, 25 for management operations and 10 for the use of its capital fund.

The management category was the Metropolit­an Housing Alliance’s only score that was consistent­ly below the standard performanc­e threshold of 15 points, or 60%, between 2011 and 2018. The scores of 14 or lower led to a “substandar­d performer” designatio­n from the department from 2012-16. The management score was 5 and the total score was 57 in 2017, leading to a “troubled” designatio­n because the total score fell below 60 points.

Lowe said one reason for the “troubled” label in 2017 was that the authority did not meet the deadline for allocating its capital fund money.

“We owned it, we corrected it, we fixed it,” Lowe said. “We took a hit, bounced back and kept moving forward.”

The authority purchased new computer software in 2015 through an $183,000 software contract with Tenmast, a Lexington, Ky.-based firm later bought by MRI Software. This eliminated several of the recurring issues in the audits, Lowe said, because the authority was unable to find and produce documentat­ion in the first half of the 2010s to prove that it was adhering to critical rules, including verifying tenants’ incomes and housing them in order from the waiting list.

From 2012-15, “it could not be determined that the Authority is housing applicants in the proper order from the waiting list” for public housing, according to the audits. Applicants for the most part are housed on a first-come, first-served basis, but each housing authority can set its own preference­s that move some applicants up the list.

The Metropolit­an Housing Authority gives preference to employed applicants and to people who were previously homeless.

Kendall Lewellen, Fort Smith-based managing attorney for the Center for Arkansas Legal Services, said housing authoritie­s should be able to prove they adhere to their own rules in order to maintain public trust.

“People should be able to reasonably expect when they’re going to get off the waiting list, and if there are local preference­s, those should be followed consistent­ly so applicants know what to expect,” Lewellen said.

The housing authority was not verified to be following federal rules for ensuring tenant eligibilit­y from 201315, raising concerns that the authority “could be charging the incorrect amount of rent or could be housing ineligible tenants.”

Auditors also saw that third-party income verificati­on, or the housing authority’s efforts to ensure public housing tenants were truthful about their incomes and would be able to afford rent, was not adequately documented from 2012-16.

Fred Fuchs, an attorney based in Austin, Texas, and the housing group coordinato­r with Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, said adherence to income verificati­on and tenant eligibilit­y rules is imperative to treating tenants fairly.

“If you don’t have in place good standards to ensure income is correctly calculated and so is rent, and tenants aren’t given the proper amount and allowed to have reduced payments when they suffer a decrease in income, that’s a serious issue because tenants might be evicted who would otherwise be able to stay,” Fuchs said.

The housing authority verifies prospectiv­e tenants’ incomes by checking their W2 tax forms and contacting their employers if applicable, Lowe said. If neither option is available, the housing authority can get a sworn declaratio­n, under penalty of perjury, from the tenants themselves regarding income.

Lowe said the documentat­ion problem has been fixed, thanks to the housing authority’s new technology, and the income verificati­on issue has not come up again since the 2016 audit.

“That goes back to training and keeping abreast of what [federal housing department] rules say,” he said. “It’s the only way you’re going to keep up how rules change.”

SECTION 8

The audits also spotlighte­d repeated issues with documentin­g Housing Assistance Payments, the three-way agreement between Section 8 tenants, landlords and housing authoritie­s that enumerates who pays how much of the rent, some of which is billed to the federal housing department.

Housing authoritie­s must keep records of Housing Assistance Payment contracts, and the authority did not meet federal requiremen­ts for monitoring these contracts and payments from 2012-14, according to the audits. Lowe said increased training and better technology rectified these issues.

Fuchs said incorrect Housing Assistance Payments could be detrimenta­l to a housing authority’s Section 8 program.

“If the housing authority is not making correct payments and has a general reputation in the community with landlords that they’re not correctly administer­ing the Section 8 program, you’ll have fewer landlords willing to participat­e, and it’s harder for people to find housing with their voucher,” Fuchs said.

Lowe said this has never been a problem and has not reduced the amount of potential Section 8 units in Little Rock.

“Availabili­ty has to do with whether there’s enough housing stock, including apartments, in order to fulfill the Section 8 requiremen­ts,” he said. “If there’s less housing stock, and landlords don’t have to accept Section 8, then housing is going to be reduced. There are a lot of moving parts, [and] it’s more than just writing the check.”

Required inspection­s of Section 8 units from 2013-15 were found to be lacking in both number and timeliness, according to the audits. Lowe said one way the housing authority addressed this from 2016 onward was to hire contractor­s for inspection­s instead of handling them all in-house.

Unit inspection­s have been conducted via photograph­s and videos since March 2020 in order to limit interperso­nal contact during the covid-19 pandemic.

Lowe emphasized that the findings in the yearly audits are meant to help the housing authority better serve its tenants.

“Anybody who knows me knows I love constructi­ve criticism because that’s the only way we’re going to get better,” he said. “I don’t shy away from it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States