Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

A tax break for rich just makes no sense

-

Newly in control of Congress and the White House, and with a huge policy to-do list left over from the Trump years and the coronaviru­s pandemic, Democrats are fairly overflowin­g with legislativ­e ideas, many of them worth pursuing — and at least one that is decidedly not. We refer to the push by some congressio­nal Democrats to reinstate the federal tax deductibil­ity of state and local taxes paid.

Such a measure would deprive the government of up to $80 billion per year to help pay for President Joe Biden’s ambitious environmen­tal, infrastruc­ture and health care plans. Yet if the history of this break’s impact is any guide, more than half of the benefits would accrue to the top-earning 20% of taxpayers, according to the Tax Policy Center. There’s nothing progressiv­e about that; frankly, there’s nothing particular­ly centrist about it.

Democratic proponents of reinstatin­g full deductibil­ity of state and local taxes — or SALT — point out, correctly, that it was part of the tax code for more than 100 years until the Trump tax bill of 2017 capped the deductible amount at $10,000. The net effect was to reduce the deduction’s cost to the government from $100.9 billion in fiscal 2017 to $21.2 billion in fiscal 2019, a savings Republican­s used to help cut tax rates for individual­s and corporatio­ns.

There is simply no denying, however, that the SALT deduction disproport­ionately benefits well-off households, and that limiting it was one of the few aspects of the Trump bill that actually promoted tax progressiv­ity. It also reduced a nontranspa­rent transfer from the rest of the country to high-tax, high-service states such as California, New York, New Jersey, Massachuse­tts and Maryland. Proponents of the SALT deduction, many of whom represent upper-income, Democratic-leaning cities and suburbs in the aforementi­oned states, say restrictin­g it amounted to a federal penalty on states that offer a higher level of education, public health and the like. The better way to render such federal support, though, is openly and directly, via spending — as Biden has already done through his covid-relief bill, and as he plans to do in a new $2 trillion infrastruc­ture package.

Neverthele­ss, four House Democrats from New York and New Jersey have gone so far as to argue that the Biden package must include reinstatem­ent of the SALT deduction, a significan­t fact given that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has only a fourvote majority to work with. For now, Pelosi has not definitive­ly said where she stands on including the SALT break in Biden’s bill, though she, like Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., has favored reinstatin­g it in the past. The White House, meanwhile, appears reluctant to go along, with spokeswoma­n Jen Psaki observing Thursday that restoring SALT deductibil­ity “obviously is not a revenue raiser” and challengin­g proponents to come up with a way to pay for it. Unfortunat­ely for Biden, the issue divides his party, but the truly progressiv­e course is to resist this tax break for the rich no matter how many Democrats favor it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States