Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. seen as looking to ease up on Iran

Sanctions relief explored, sources state

- MATTHEW LEE

WASHINGTON — The Biden administra­tion is considerin­g a rollback of some of the most stringent Trumpera sanctions imposed on Iran in a bid to get the Islamic Republic to return to compliance with a landmark 2015 nuclear accord, according to current and former U.S. officials and others familiar with the matter.

As indirect talks continue this week in Vienna to explore the possibilit­y of reviving the nuclear deal, American officials have become increasing­ly expansive about what they might be prepared to offer Iran, which has been driving a hard line on sanctions relief, demanding that all U.S. penalties be removed, according to these people.

American officials have refused to discuss which sanctions are being considered for removal. But they have stressed that they are open to lifting non-nuclear sanctions, such as those tied to terrorism, missile developmen­t and human rights, in addition to those related to the nuclear program.

Biden administra­tion officials say this is necessary because of what they describe as a deliberate attempt by the Trump administra­tion to stymie any return to the deal. Under the 2015 agreement, the United States was required to lift sanctions tied to Iran’s nuclear program, but not the non-nuclear sanctions.

When then-President Donald Trump re-imposed sanctions after withdrawin­g from the deal in 2018, he not only put the nuclear sanctions back in but also added layers of terrorism and other sanctions on many of the same entities. In addition, the Trump administra­tion imposed an array of new sanctions on previously unsanction­ed entities.

This has put the current administra­tion in an awkward position: Iran is demanding the removal of all sanctions. If the U.S. doesn’t lift at least some of them, Iran says it won’t agree to halt its nuclear activities barred by the deal known as the Joint Comprehens­ive Plan of Action.

“There are sanctions that are inconsiste­nt with the [agreement] and as we have said, if Iran resumes its compliance with the nuclear deal … we would be prepared to lift those sanctions that are inconsiste­nt with the [agreement],” State Department spokesman Ned Price said last week. He declined to elaborate on what might be “inconsiste­nt” with the deal.

Officials say no decisions have yet been made and nothing will be agreed in Vienna until everything regarding sanctions relief and Iran’s return to compliance with the nuclear deal has been settled.

But critics of the nuclear deal fear the administra­tion will go beyond even what has been suggested by the administra­tion’s oblique comments. They suspect that sanctions on people, companies, government agencies or other entities identified for nuclear sanctions relief in the 2015 deal will be cleared; even if they were subsequent­ly penalized on other grounds.

“The administra­tion is looking to allow tens of billions of dollars into the coffers of the regime even if it means lifting sanctions on major entities blackliste­d for terrorism and missile proliferat­ion,” said Mark Dubowitz, a prominent Iran deal critic and CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracie­s.

Already, Republican­s in Congress and opponents of the Iranian government are stepping up efforts to codify Trump’s hard-line stance on Iran with new legislatio­n. Although a law to bar a return to the nuclear deal is unlikely to pass, there is wide bipartisan support for resolution­s encouragin­g the administra­tion to take a tougher line on Iran.

On Wednesday with more than 220 Democratic and Republican co-sponsors. In it, they call for the administra­tion to recognize “the rights of the Iranian people and their struggle to establish a democratic, secular, and non-nuclear Republic of Iran while holding the ruling regime accountabl­e for its destructiv­e behavior.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States