Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

ACA ruling boon to many

- By Erwin Chemerinsk­y Erwin Chemerinsk­y is dean of the University of California-Berkeley School of Law and a contributi­ng writer to Opinion.

The Supreme Court’s decision Thursday to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act breaks no new legal ground, but it has enormous practical significan­ce in that it means that 21 million people will keep their health insurance coverage.

In 2012, in National Federation of Independen­t Business v. Sebelius, the court in a 5-4 decision upheld the constituti­onality of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. One of the key issues before the court was the constituti­onality of the individual mandate, the requiremen­t that people purchase insurance or pay a penalty. The court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., held that the individual mandate was a valid exercise of Congress’s power to impose a tax for the general welfare.

The Affordable Care Act imposed many new restrictio­ns on insurance companies to protect consumers: It prevented denial of insurance coverage because of preexistin­g conditions; it stopped insurance companies from charging more in premiums to those with chronic conditions; it eliminated caps on yearly or lifetime benefits.

The individual mandate was crucial for these changes because otherwise people would wait to purchase insurance until they were sick. That would not be viable because health insurance works only if healthy people are among those insured.

In December 2017, as part of the tax reform bill, Congress eliminated the penalty for individual­s not purchasing health insurance. Texas and several other states, as well as some individual­s, brought a new lawsuit arguing that this action makes the Affordable Care Act unconstitu­tional.

They argued that the individual mandate had been upheld as a tax, but no longer could be characteri­zed in that manner because Congress had eliminated the penalty for failing to purchase health insurance. The challenger­s argued that this made the entire act unconstitu­tional. The Trump administra­tion agreed and urged the federal court to strike down the entire statute. California and other “blue” states intervened to defend the law.

The lower federal courts agreed with Texas and the challenger­s that the individual mandate no longer could be upheld as a constituti­onal exercise of the taxing power, but said there was still the question of whether that made the whole statute invalid. Before those courts could address that issue, the Supreme Court granted review.

The stakes in the case could not be higher. We are in the midst of the worst public health crisis in over a century and more than 20 million people receive health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. Undoubtedl­y, the justices were cognizant of this when they heard the case.

On Thursday, the court left the act in place. The majority opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer said that Texas and the other states had no standing to sue because they suffered no harm from Congress eliminatin­g the penalty for not purchasing insurance.

Likewise, the individual plaintiffs incurred no harm because there is no longer any penalty for not purchasing health insurance.

This all seems so obvious that one wonders why it even got to this stage. It is crucial to remember that everything about the Affordable Care Act has been deeply partisan. Every Republican in Congress voted against it. Four conservati­ve justices would have struck down the entire law in 2012.

At the time, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was then a conservati­ve law professor, was outspoken in criticizin­g the court’s upholding the law. Texas and other “red” states and the Trump administra­tion saw this as their chance to finally kill the law. And conservati­ve judges in the lower courts agreed with them.

Let’s hope Thursday’s decision ends the legal challenges to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although it has not fulfilled all of its promise, it has been a huge success.

Unfortunat­ely, in 2012, the court struck down the requiremen­t in the ACA that every state increase the scope of its Medicaid program. Many states with Republican legislatur­es and Republican governors then refused to do so, leaving tens of millions of Americans without insurance.

Even though fewer people are covered than was initially intended, the ACA has made a huge difference in so many people’s lives. The court’s latest Obamacare ruling will maintain health insurance for millions who would otherwise be left out in the cold.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States