Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

The cliff’s edge

- Bret Stephens Bret Stephens is a New York Times columnist.

On Saturday, Sept. 11, a diminished president will preside over a diminished nation.

We are a country that could not keep a demagogue from the White House, could not stop an insurrecti­onist mob from storming the Capitol, could not win (or at least avoid losing) a war against a morally and technologi­cally retrograde enemy, cannot conquer a disease for which there are safe and effective vaccines, and cannot bring itself to trust the government, the news media, the scientific establishm­ent, the police, or any other institutio­n meant to operate for the common good.

A civilizati­on “is born stoic and dies epicurean,” wrote historian Will Durant about the Babylonian­s. Our civilizati­on was born optimistic and enlightene­d, at least by the standards of the day. Now it feels as if it’s fading into paranoid senility.

Joe Biden was supposed to be the man of the hour, a calming presence exuding decency, moderation and trust. As a candidate, he sold himself as a transition­al president, a fatherly figure in the mold of George H.W.

Bush who would restore dignity and prudence to the Oval Office after the mendacity and chaos that came before. It’s why I voted for him, as did so many others who once tipped red.

Instead, Biden has become the emblem of the hour: headstrong but shaky, ambitious but inept. He seems to be the last person in America to realize that, whatever the theoretica­l merits of the decision to withdraw our remaining troops from Afghanista­n, the military and intelligen­ce assumption­s on which it was built were deeply flawed, the manner in which it was executed was a national humiliatio­n and a moral betrayal, and the timing was catastroph­ic.

We find ourselves commemorat­ing the first great jihadi victory over America in 2001, right after delivering the second great jihadi victory over America in 2021. The Sept. 11 memorial at the World Trade Center—water cascading into one void, and then trickling, out of sight, into another—has never felt more fitting.

Now Biden proposes to follow this up with his $3.5 trillion budget reconcilia­tion bill, which The Times’ Jonathan Weisman describes as “the most significan­t expansion of the nation’s safety net since the war on poverty in the 1960s.”

Maybe Biden supposes that the legislatio­n, if passed, will prove increasing­ly popular over time, like Obamacare. That’s the optimistic scenario. Alternativ­ely, he could suffer a legislativ­e calamity like Hillary Clinton’s health-care reform in 1994, which would have ended Bill Clinton’s presidency save for his sharp swing to the center, including ending “welfare as we know it” two years later.

Even the Obamacare/optimistic precedent was followed by a Democratic rout in 2010, when the party lost 63 House seats. If history repeats itself at the 2022 midterms, I doubt that even Joe Biden’s closest aides think he has the stamina to fight his way back in 2024. Has Kamala Harris shown the political talent to pick up the pieces?

Perhaps what will save the Democrats is that Biden’s weakness will tempt Donald Trump to seek (and almost certainly gain) the Republican nomination. But then there’s the chance he’d win the election.

There’s a way back from this cliff’s edge. It begins with Biden finding a way to acknowledg­e publicly the gravity of his administra­tion’s blunders. The most shameful aspect of the Afghanista­n withdrawal was the incompeten­ce of the State Department when it came to expediting visas for thousands of people eligible to come to the United States. Accountabi­lity could start with Antony Blinken’s resignatio­n.

The president might also seize the “strategic pause” Joe Manchin has proposed and push House Democrats to pass the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastruc­ture bill without holding it hostage to the $3.5 trillion reconcilia­tion bill. Infrastruc­ture is far more popular with middle-of-the-road voters than the Great Society reprise that was never supposed to be a part of the Biden brand.

My sense is that Biden will do neither. The last few months have told us something worrying about this president: He’s proud, inflexible, and thinks he’s much smarter than he really is. That’s bad news for the administra­tion. It’s worse news for a country that desperatel­y needs to avoid another failed presidency.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States