Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Country music’s DNA

Conservati­ve politics are deeply ingrained in this popular division of the music industry.

- PETER LA CHAPELLE

Many expressed shock in late September when country music star Jason Aldean became embroiled in a political controvers­y. His wife Brittany Aldean posted pictures on Instagram of their children wearing pro-Trump and anti-Biden outfits, including T-shirts that read “Hidin’ from Biden.” When commenters lamented the children being used as political props, Jason Aldean jumped in. “We will teach our kids what we think is right and what we think is best for their future.”

He called those who believed that 2021 was going well “delusional!” The country star then demanded, “Please tell me one thing that the current administra­tion has done that is positive? Just one!!!” The Aldean family has since doubled down, with Brittany Aldean and Jason’s sister Kasi Rosa Wicks announcing on Nov. 8 that they would be selling a line of right-wing clothing for three days during that week’s CMA Awards, the genre’s biggest award show, and in which Jason Aldean released his new album. Aldean’s public embrace of right-wing politics prompted journalist Marissa R. Moss to point out the irony that while some country stations have stopped playing outspoken left-leaning women such as Kacey Musgraves and Mickey Guyton and the industry infamously blackliste­d the Chicks for negative comments about President George W. Bush in 2003, Aldean has faced few consequenc­es.

Why the difference? Aldean’s recent stances—including the nods to family, the burning sense of political grievance and adherence to a certain vision of a nation and a people under threat—are embedded into the very DNA of the country music industry.

Country music was actually political even before it was a bona fide genre. Figures such as Sen. Tom Watson (D-Ga.) and brothers Bob and Alf Taylor, who both eventually served as governors of Tennessee, played old-time fiddle tunes to entertain crowds at their political rallies in the late 19th century.

As the genre emerged on phonograph­s, first as “old time” music and then as “hillbilly,” its promoters often depicted it as a wholesome family affair, populated by family bands such as the Carters and the Pickards who spun picturesqu­e tales of mountain living in the 1920s.

During World War II, populist Texas Gov. Pappy O’Daniel brought together country’s political

streak and its embrace of family. He argued that GIs should take after his son Pat—a member of his campaign band—and bring along a banjo or guitar as means of avoiding base-side “booze dives.”

This focus on familial wholesomen­ess hit a fevered pitch by the late 1950s after more than a decade of well-publicized congressio­nal hearings on culture and morality, including organized crime, Communists in Hollywood, and comic books. As the folk band the Weavers lost recording contracts after they came under scrutiny for alleged Communist ties, others doubled down on family values to ward off investigat­ions.

Grand Ole Opry comedian Minnie Pearl reminded readers in a 1956 column that country music—rooted in pioneer families teaching their children to play “guitar, banjo, or bass fiddle”—complement­ed American institutio­ns and culture. The genre spoke “of God and faith; it sings of courage and honor and fundamenta­l decency.”

Yet a dispute between two major royalty collection agencies, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) propelled the industry into the spotlight in 1958. ASCAP recruited well-known consumeris­m critic Vance Packard to argue before a Senate subcommitt­ee that the country music produced by BMI’s “hillbilly” artists lowered standards because it was a “neglected lode of cheaply mined music.”

Country’s backers aggressive­ly defended their genre during the hearings by trumpeting its cultural conservati­sm: faith and family, deep American roots and to some extent, perceived whiteness. Jimmie Davis, a country performer and former Louisiana governor, called Packard’s remarks an “insult to millions of Americans who enjoyed folk music and who gained spiritual comfort from gospel music and songs of faith and inspiratio­n.” And Little Jimmy Dickens reminded how his songs reflected the struggles of families and “everyday hard-working God-fearing people.”

These defenders conspicuou­sly avoided two inconvenie­nt realities: the burgeoning trade in jukebox hits that spoke frankly of cheating, divorce, alcoholism and abandoned families, and the genre’s deep connection­s to Black culture through West African instrument­s such as the banjo and a strong 19th-century fiddling and calling tradition among African American Southerner­s.

Instead, the message was clear: Country was a wholesome white middle-class-friendly genre and stood for Americanne­ss, family and God.

The hearings ended somewhat anticlimac­tically with the subcommitt­ee finding little evidence that BMI fostered a monopoly or manipulate­d the public’s taste. Legislatio­n seeking to rein in BMI fizzled later that year.

Yet the controvers­y had a long-lasting impact. It fueled a deep-seated defensiven­ess in the country music industry. Just months after the hearings, the Country Music Associatio­n, the genre’s largest and longest-lived trade organizati­on, emerged to promote the genre’s labels and send delegates out to work with new broadcaste­rs. The CMA also helped fight off rock ’n’ roll as it rose to threaten country’s market share; “circling the wagons” against foes, as one observer later put it.

The CMA soon fostered ties with national politician­s as well. Sen. Estes Kefauver (D-Tenn.), who was not part of the royalty hearings but had come to symbolize the age of congressio­nal inquiry with his leading role in earlier hearings, was a natural ally. He had previously enlisted Grand Ole Opry members George Morgan, Billy Grammer and Hank Snow to perform at campaign stops.

And by the early 1960s, he was the CMA’s point man for copyright legislatio­n and for ensuring passage of a national Country Music Week resolution each year in the Senate. Right before his death in 1963, Kefauver even urged President John F. Kennedy to mark the week with a presidenti­al proclamati­on. That ambition had to wait until the 1970s, when Richard M. Nixon declared October Country Music Month.

Although politician­s ranging from Nixon on the right to Sen. Glen Taylor (D-Idaho), a left-wing radio singing cowboy, used the genre to signal their connection to the common people, the industry apparatus developed a public posture whereby its stars avoided political positions to avoid alienating segments of its audience.

Ernest Tubb, for instance, self-censored when he shared his misgivings about Nixon with fellow performers but not the press when that president visited the Opry. Producers coached others to sideline or delay potentiall­y political releases, including Merle Haggard with his interracia­l love song “Irma Jackson.”

This was far from a uniform policy. When former CMA president and recording star Tex Ritter ran unsuccessf­ully in the Tennessee GOP primary for Senate in 1970, many fellow performers endorsed and performed for Ritter. Johnny Cash even served as his finance chairman.

Most problemati­cally, the industry and fans convenient­ly turned a blind eye to performers politickin­g on behalf of forceful reactionar­y politician­s or causes. Most famously, the Opry refused to condemn more than a dozen members—including Pearl, Snow and Grammer—who endorsed or performed in conjunctio­n with the campaigns of ardent segregatio­nist George C. Wallace.

The king and queen of the genre, George Jones and Tammy Wynette, hosted a fundraiser for Wallace— what the press called a “Wallace Woodstock”—in the aftermath of his near-assassinat­ion in 1972. Neither the CMA nor the record labels uttered a peep.

But that courtesy didn’t always extend to performers who took positions on the other side of the spectrum, as the Chicks learned in 2003 when singer Natalie Maines noted her embarrassm­ent over George W. Bush being a fellow Texan during the lead-up to the Iraq War. Radio conglomera­te Cumulus Media banned the top-selling group, and its members confronted protests and even the smashing of their CDs.

At its root, this divergence owed to the industry’s history. Country has always had its left-leaning Willie Nelsons and its right-leaning Toby Keiths. Labels and the CMA, on the other hand, have regularly opted to circle the wagons against foes, often with culturally conservati­ve displays of faith, family and Americanne­ss. Favoring the conservati­ve side of the equation almost seemed a part of the industry’s DNA.

Some have pondered whether the industry might be changing as it seeks to reshape its image in the wake of recent scandals surroundin­g sexual harassment, the deliberate suppressio­n of women artists from radio airplay, the de-charting of gay Black artist Lil Nas X, and the use of the n-word by white star Morgan Wallen, who was banned from attending the CMA Awards this year.

Doors, however, are already beginning to reopen for Wallen, so perhaps it isn’t any wonder they never really shut for the more establishe­d Aldean.

Perhaps Aldean is only embodying the industry’s greatest historical fears and its most basic values.

 ?? ILLUSTRATI­ON BY JOHN DEERING ??
ILLUSTRATI­ON BY JOHN DEERING
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States