Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

National strength essential for global security

- TERRY BENHAM Terry Benham is a veteran of the United States Army and a partner at Impact Management Group in Little Rock. All statements represent his own opinions.

The world is safer when America is strong. Throughout our lifetime, the world has looked to America first. Perhaps it wasn’t always that way, but as far back as 1630, John Winthrop declared in a sermon that America would become a “city on a hill,” representi­ng the hope and aspiration­s of all free men and women.

Ronald Reagan later revived that phrase, rallying conservati­ves across the country around a belief in American exceptiona­lism and a hope that we would remain a nation which is “sought out by those possessed by an abiding love of freedom and a special kind of courage.”

Strength and courage are in our DNA. First exemplifie­d by our founding fathers, these attributes assert and preserve our exceptiona­l stance in the world. From the beginning, we’ve been a refuge and a beacon of hope to those who seek freedom from oppression and the opportunit­y to pursue their dreams.

Whether in our home defense or through our internatio­nal liberation of the oppressed, the men and women of the United States Armed Forces have always been the strength of the American idea. It’s through them and strong national defense policies that we remain exceptiona­l and a pillar of strength for our allies and those seeking hope of a better tomorrow.

The Republican Party has always stood for a strong national defense.

The platform states, “Our self-evident rights must always continue to be secured at the individual, state, national, and internatio­nal levels.”

Sounds nice, but what does that actually mean as it relates to the idea of American exceptiona­lism? It’s worth noting how the statement is structured. It begins at the most basic level: the individual. So for many conservati­ves, a strong national defense means a commitment by the individual to serve the state, the country, and the world.

As a nation, we have faced many threats and adversarie­s together. What was once bandits and piracy evolved to the British crown, the Axis powers, and the Cold War. Those conflicts have evolved today into the form of Islamic fundamenta­lism, cyber criminals, and opportunis­tic nation states.

These threats may be remarkably different and the problems more complex, but the requiremen­t from America is the same. We must be the strong, stable symbol of hope in the face of adversity. We must remember the core mission for the Department of Defense: to (first) deter war and to protect the security of the United States.

Our adversarie­s are working hard to divide and conquer us. They work to weaken our resolve while simultaneo­usly destabiliz­ing the world. The notion that we should only worry about our own borders is nonsensica­l. The forward defense doctrine has proven effective at both deterring war and protecting the security of our national interests.

Although costly, U.S. military presence within the borders of those nations who sponsor or harbor our adversarie­s can often lead to a stability that protects both American security and entire regions. It is undeniable that when America projects strength, we provide stability to the world.

The Biden administra­tion’s withdrawal from Afghanista­n had the opposite effect. In generous terms, it was an abysmal failure. While many would agree that a withdrawal of troops from the Middle East was necessary and eventual, the incompeten­t execution of the withdrawal process combined with a lack of a coherent communicat­ion strategy was a complete disaster.

We isolated our departure point, a blunder that will be studied for decades. We lost 13 American service members to poor perimeter security measures. We broke our promise to the Afghan people to protect them from the groups that had terrorized their lives. Progress made in taking back territory from these oppressive groups has all but reverted to normal.

Twenty years erased. It showed the United States to be weak, unresolved, and untrustwor­thy, and it further emboldened our adversarie­s.

In addition to that mess that still isn’t over, we have additional challenges. China, both economical­ly and militarily, is a threat to global stability. Its economic influence is undeniable, however, it’s the nation’s investment in military spending, naval warships, and biological and nuclear capabiliti­es that is the most alarming.

The perception of American weakness has emboldened them to explore gray zone warfare tactics against U.S. allies such as Taiwan. Also emboldened by the perception of weakness, Russia has now deployed 100,000 soldiers on the border with Ukraine in a game of chicken with the North Atlantic Treaty Organizati­on (NATO) nations. Make no mistake, it’s a dangerous time across the globe.

We must concentrat­e our efforts on building a strong military focused on the core mission of war fighters: to deter war and protect the security of the United States. We must continue to fully fund our military needs with the understand­ing that we can’t just spend more; we have to spend smart. We must pull the plug on outdated projects and zero in on research and developmen­t for fighting the next war and protecting some of our exposed vulnerabil­ities.

We must aggressive­ly streamline the bureaucrac­y within the Department of Defense and address the core mission as stated. This includes minimizing mission distractio­ns. The men and women of the Armed Forces are tasked with being a lethal deterrent to our enemies. It’s their individual sacrifices that make them, their unit, and our military the most lethal in the history of the world. Let’s stick to that and leave social experiment­s to our civilian society.

American exceptiona­lism begins with the power of the individual. It’s a willingnes­s to sacrifice for the benefit of others in our community, in our country, and in our world. American strength comes from those exceptiona­l individual­s dedicated to a military powerful enough to deter war and protect the security of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Our exceptiona­lism and our strength are under attack by both external and internal influences. If we are to remain a beacon of hope, stability, and security then we must stop playing politics with our national defense and distractin­g from the core mission of war fighters. Otherwise, our own security may be in jeopardy.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States