Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Proof of address, citizenshi­p needed, Arizona voters told

Critics say just-signed bill could affect up to 200,000 and is unconstitu­tional

- JONATHAN J. COOPER

“Arizona’s way out on a limb here. The provisions in this bill are not really found anywhere in the country.” — Jon Sherman, litigation director for the Fair Elections Center

PHOENIX — Arizona’s Republican governor on Wednesday signed a bill requiring voters to prove their citizenshi­p to vote in a presidenti­al election, drawing opposition from voting rights advocates who say it risks affecting some 200,000 people.

The bill also requires anyone newly registerin­g to vote to provide proof of their address.

The Legislatur­e’s own lawyers say much of the measure is unconstitu­tional, directly contradict­s a recent Supreme Court decision and is likely to be thrown out in court.

“Election integrity means counting every lawful vote and prohibitin­g any attempt to illegally cast a vote,” Gov. Doug Ducey said in a letter explaining his decision to sign the bill.

He called the bill “a balanced approach that honors Arizona’s history of making voting accessible without sacrificin­g security in our elections.”

Rep. Jake Hoffman, who developed the bill along with the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation, said the measure is about eliminatin­g opportunit­ies for fraud.

The precise impact is a matter of dispute. Ducey, Hoffman and other supporters say it affects only the roughly 31,500 voters who have not shown proof of citizenshi­p. Voting advocates say it’s vague and could go much farther, affecting hundreds of thousands of people who haven’t recently updated their voter registrati­on or driver’s license.

“Arizona’s way out on a limb here,” said Jon Sherman, litigation director for the Fair Elections Center. “The provisions in this bill are not really found anywhere in the country.”

Arizona is the only state that requires voters to prove their citizenshi­p when they register, a provision adopted in a 2004 ballot measure known as Propositio­n 200. Voters can demonstrat­e citizenshi­p by providing a driver’s license or tribal ID number, or they can attach a copy of a birth certificat­e, passport or naturaliza­tion documents. Voters already registered at the time were grandfathe­red in.

In a challenge to Propositio­n 200, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that Arizona can adopt its own eligibilit­y criteria for state elections but must accept a federal voter registrati­on form for federal elections. The federal form requires voters to attest under penalty of perjury that they are citizens, but unlike the state form, it does not require them to provide documentar­y proof.

The state has tried unsuccessf­ully to get the federal form changed.

The ruling created a class of voters who can vote only for president, U.S. House and U.S. Senate known as “federal only voters.” There are 31,500 people currently registered that way, according to the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office.

The bill would prohibit federal-only voters from voting by mail or voting for president.

The bill also requires people to include proof of their address with new voter registrati­ons. Voting rights advocates say it will make registrati­on drives much more complicate­d, especially among people who don’t have an Arizona driver’s license or state ID with an up-to-date address, such as college students, Native Americans and seniors who no longer drive.

The bill would take effect 90 days after the end of the legislativ­e session, which is likely to fall between the primary and general elections. Affected voters could vote legally in the Aug. 2 primary, would get notified their registrati­on was at risk of cancellati­on if they didn’t prove their citizenshi­p, and they’d have until Oct. 11 to fix the issue or miss their chance to vote in the general election.

Republican supporters say they plan to pass another bill delaying the start until after the 2022 election, but nothing has yet been introduced.

Sam Almy, a data analyst who consults for Democratic campaigns, said his analysis of voter registrati­on records found just under 220,000 voters who have not updated their registrati­on since 2004, when Propositio­n 200 passed.

The group skews heavily toward registered Republican­s, older people and those who consistent­ly vote.

 ?? ?? Ducey
Ducey

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States