Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.N. report: WHO staff stuck to policy

Investigat­ors find no violations in Congo sexual misconduct case’s handling

- MARIA CHENG Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Jamey Keaten of The Associated Press.

LONDON — A confidenti­al U.N. report into allegation­s of missteps by senior World Health Organizati­on staffers in the way they handled a sexual misconduct case during an Ebola outbreak in Congo found their response didn’t violate the agency’s policies because of what some officials described as a “loophole” in how the WHO defines victims of such behavior.

The report, which was submitted to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu­s last month and wasn’t released publicly, was obtained by The Associated Press. The WHO did not respond to requests for comment.

The U.N. investigat­ion comes after a 2021 review by a panel appointed by Tedros found that three WHO managers fumbled a sexual misconduct case first reported by the AP earlier that year, involving a U.N. health agency doctor signing a contract to buy land for a young woman he reportedly impregnate­d.

Last week, Tedros said U.N. investigat­ors concluded the “managerial misconduct” charges were unsubstant­iated and the three staffers returned to work after being on administra­tive leave. The WHO chief said the agency would seek advice from experts on how to handle the inconsiste­ncies between the two reports.

The investigat­ors said Tedros was informed of the sexual misconduct allegation­s in 2019 and had been warned of worrying gaps in the WHO’s misconduct policies the previous year.

“If these issues were brought to Tedros’ attention and no action was taken, [WHO] member states must demand accountabi­lity,” said Dr. Irwin Redlener, a global health expert at Columbia University.

Tedros has previously said he became aware of sexual misconduct complaints in Congo only after media reports in September 2020 and learned of the specific case reported by the AP when it was published.

He said anyone connected to sexual misconduct faced consequenc­es including dismissal. To date, no senior WHO staffers linked to the abuse and exploitati­on have been fired.

In May 2021, an AP investigat­ion revealed senior WHO management was told of sexual exploitati­on during the agency’s efforts to stop Ebola in eastern Congo from 20182020 but did little to stop it.

Among the cases WHO management was warned about was the allegation that Dr. Jean-Paul Ngandu, an infection control specialist sent to Beni, had impregnate­d a young woman. Ngandu met the woman at a restaurant one evening shortly after he arrived — and following mandatory WHO training on the prevention of sexual misconduct.

According to the U.N. report, the two had sex later that evening and Ngandu gave her some money the next morning. The relationsh­ip soured and the woman and her aunt later went to the WHO office in Beni to complain that Ngandu had impregnate­d her. AP obtained a notarized agreement between Ngandu and the woman, in which he agreed to cover her health care costs and buy her land.

The deal, also signed by two WHO staffers, was meant to protect the WHO’s reputation, Ngandu said.

“After the allegation­s were made to WHO [headquarte­rs], a decision was made not to investigat­e the complaint on the basis that it did not violate WHO’s [sexual exploitati­on and abuse] policy framework,” the U.N. report said.

The review explained that the decision was made by officials from the U.N. health agency’s legal, ethics and other department­s and was due to the fact that the woman wasn’t a “beneficiar­y” of WHO assistance, meaning she didn’t receive any emergency or humanitari­an aid from the agency, and thus, didn’t qualify as a victim under WHO policy.

WHO staffers interviewe­d by U.N. investigat­ors said this might be considered a “loophole which had the potential to cause complaints to fall through the cracks.”

“Ngandu’s conduct did not violate any WHO [sexual exploitati­on and abuse] standards of conduct,” the report said, describing his agreement to pay off the woman as a “private financial settlement.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States