Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Swap chatbots for people

- HELAINE OLEN Helaine Olen is the author of “Pound Foolish: Exposing the Dark Side of the Personal Finance Industry.”She serves on the advisory board of the Economic Hardship Reporting Project.

Why won’t corporate America answer the phone? When I recently called an MRI facility about an overcharge, a pre-recorded voice told me, over and over again for 45 minutes, that call volume was “unusually high” and, by the way, the weather was compoundin­g a labor shortage. On another recent day, I needed to resolve a problem with a company with no listed phone number at all — which is how I found myself furiously pounding the keyboard in conversati­on with, yes, a chatbot at a vegan meal delivery service.

It should not be this hard to speak to a human. But, increasing­ly, companies large and small are making it difficult to access a real, live person when help is needed. Contact numbers are hard to find. Wait times to speak to an operator are long — one industry analyst estimated the average wait tripled from 2020 to 2022 and says he believes they still are a third worse than before the pandemic. Some phone lines are seemingly staffed entirely by robots, forcing you to go through menu after menu in quest of a live, real person. Or, increasing­ly, companies do not offer a telephone option at all.

This is not simply inconvenie­nt. It is contemptuo­us. And consumers pay the price in emotional aggravatio­n, in precious time and in literal money, as people give up on legitimate financial claims, because they are unable to surmount the barriers in their way.

“It’s an absolute disaster,” says Abraham Seidmann, a professor of informatio­n systems at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. “It’s a major abdication of corporate responsibi­lity.”

Companies say they are reducing options for human contact by popular demand. They claim customers often prefer a virtual option — so said Frontier Airlines after it recently ceased offering customers access to live phone agents, directing them to text, chatbot or email instead. But as the Wall Street Journal noted late last year, Frontier is simultaneo­usly telling its investors that call centers are “expensive,” while use of chatbots eliminates the customer’s ability to negotiate.

There are nods to surveys showing millennial­s and Gen Zers prefer online contact. Employers also say that in the post-pandemic world, they cannot hire enough help.

All of this is, for the most part, making excuses. If there are humans clamoring to end customer contact, it is the ones in the c-suite, where the suits are happy to save a few pennies on call services at your expense.

“I don’t want to put nefarious intent in people’s mouths, but I’m positive that a lot of these companies looked at it and went, ‘Hey, our service levels went down [during the pandemic], and we didn’t lose customers over it, so let’s keep them a little lower. Let’s see how hard we can make this before they start pushing back,’” says Jeff Gallino, the chief technical officer at CallMiner, an analytics firm.

A survey by OnePoll in 2021 found that more than two-thirds of respondent­s ranked speaking to a human representa­tive as one of their preferred methods of interactin­g with a company, while 55% identified the ability to reach a human as the most important attribute a customer service department can possess. “When people are anxious or have problems, they really, really want to talk,” says Michelle Shell, a visiting assistant professor also at the Questrom school. “You need human contact.”

As for the claim they cannot find willing employees? Yes, turnover is traditiona­lly high in the call center industry and even higher in the wake of the “great resignatio­n.” On the other hand, given that call centers are located around the globe, that is quite the worker shortage.

What is really going on here is a question of power. Increasing­ly, leverage belongs not to the customer paying the bills but to the company offering the needed service — sometimes one for which there is no competitio­n. Foisting the work onto the consumer is a bet that the customer has no other options or will not choose to exercise them. And often, that bet is a good one.

None of this is to say that it is always necessary to speak to a human. It is easy enough to make a restaurant reservatio­n online. But we need a human touch when things go wrong. We want help, not to spend hours looking for a useful phone number on Facebook (in case you were wondering, it does not exist) or navigating endless phone trees.

The difficulty of reaching humans for customer support is an imposition on both our time and our finances, forcing us to spend what can be hours of labor — sometimes known as shadow work or a time tax

- to resolve what should be simple problems. It is one factor contributi­ng to the sense that we as American consumers are fighting our battles alone, as so much prey for big business. And it is not so unreasonab­le to say we deserve better than that.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States