Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Hatred fuels new right

- DAVID FRENCH

It keeps happening. Since the ascendance of Donald Trump, with depressing regularity, right-wing men have been outed for using the most vile rhetoric. In private chats and sometimes in full view of the public on social media, they’ll engage in blatantly racist, sexist and homophobic speech, flirt with fascist imagery and then often disavow their words and actions the instant they’re caught.

The examples are legion, and they’re not coming from fringe outlets on the American right. For example, last month, the Ron DeSantis campaign parted ways with a young speechwrit­er named Nate Hochman who reportedly inserted a Nazi sonnenrad symbol into a pro-DeSantis video online. Hochman was previously under fire for telling Nick Fuentes, a notorious white supremacis­t, that Fuentes was “probably a better influence” than conservati­ve political commentato­r Ben Shapiro “on young men who might otherwise be conservati­ve.”

In comments about the conversati­on, Hochman responded, “I said some really stupid things, which I don’t actually believe, that signaled agreement with Fuentes, even though I couldn’t disagree more with his vision of the world.” Roughly a year after that incident, according to Axios, he created the sonnenrad video.

Was Hochman fringe? Hardly. Before he joined the DeSantis campaign, he worked as a staff writer at National Review and interned at The Dispatch, where I worked as a senior editor before joining The New York Times. He even once wrote for the Times.

Hochman is not alone. In June, the right-wing publicatio­n Breitbart published group chats and private messages from Pedro Gonzalez, a popular online influencer and DeSantis supporter, which included comments like “Whites are the only hope nonwhites have of living civilized lives” and “The only tactical considerat­ion of Jews is screening them for movements,” along with a host of other comments not suitable for a family publicatio­n.

Terrible stuff. And even more terrible is the realizatio­n that I could fill this entire column with other examples of right-wing bigotry, from Christian nationalis­ts, a former Trump speechwrit­er, a former Daily Caller editor and one of Tucker Carlson’s former top writers. And this is hardly a complete list. The problem is so widespread that Aaron Sibarium, a rising star reporter for The Washington Free Beacon, recently posted, “Whenever I’m on a career advice panel for young conservati­ves, I tell them to avoid group chats that use the N-word or otherwise blur the line between edge lording and earnest bigotry.”

What is going on? Why are parts of the right — especially the young right — so infested with outright racists and bigots?

To understand the cultural dynamic, I want to introduce you to an obscure online concept, no enemies to the right. A tiny fringe adopts this mindset as a conscious ethos, but for a much larger group, it is simply their cultural reality. In their minds, the left is so evil — and represents such an existentia­l threat — that any accommodat­ion of it (or any criticism of the right) undermines the forces of light in their great battle against the forces of darkness. Attack the left in the most searing terms, and you’ll enjoy the thunderous applause of your peers. Criticize the new right, and you can experience a vicious backlash. The result is a relentless pull to the extremes.

In fact, one of their prime reproofs of what they might call the zombie right, the Reagan right of their parents’ generation, is that it was simply too accommodat­ing. As they see it, classical liberal politics, which preserve free speech and robust debate as a priority, emboldened and empowered the left. Compromise, in their view, ran only one way, and conservati­sm conserved nothing. The left, in their mind, is winning the culture war in a rout.

And here’s where masculine insecurity enters the equation. To the new right, their opposition to the left is so obviously correct that only moral cowardice or financial opportunis­m (“grifting”) can explain any compromise. To fight on the right — mainly by trolling on social media or embracing authoritar­ianism as the based alternativ­e to weak-kneed classical liberalism — is seen as strong, courageous and cool. It’s a sign of a fierce and independen­t mind.

Thus, the troll isn’t just a troll, he’s a man. He’s a warrior.

But what happens if you disagree? What happens if you ask: Wait, are we going too far? Well, then, you’re weak and small. You become the grifter. You don’t know what time it is. All of the social sanctions you inflicted on others come crashing down on you. And if the new right is good at anything, it’s good at bullying its critics. It’s a core aspect of the entire movement.

Worse still, even when one initially embraces bigotry “only” as a form of social transgress­ion, marinating in that environmen­t soon turns trolling into conviction. In contrite comments to The Washington Free Beacon in response to additional revelation­s from his private messages, Gonzalez said, “What starts off as joking can very quickly become unironical­ly internaliz­ed as an actual belief.”

How true, especially when dissent is constantly characteri­zed as weakness or cowardice. So in the name of strength, these young men capitulate until their minds and hearts are warped beyond recognitio­n.

It’s difficult to break the hold of bigotry and fury on the online right, but as is so often the case, the solution to online evil can be found in offline relationsh­ips, the family and friends who keep us grounded to the real. Indeed, in his mea culpa, Gonzalez credits “fatherhood and learning to live for my kids” with pulling him back from his darkest thoughts. Time will tell whether he has truly changed or if he’s experienci­ng the fake sorrow of the freshly shamed, but it remains true that encounteri­ng people in full, rather than as mere online avatars for hated ideas, can indeed soften hearts and change minds.

In the meantime, these angry online sheep can still bite. They’re using their platforms to whip countless Americans into their own frenzy of fear. We should expect more bigotry and more revelation­s. Dark words spoken in secret will spill out into the public square. The lost boys of the American right corrupt our culture. Full of fury against their opponents and afraid of running afoul of their “friends,” they poison our politics and damage their own souls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States