Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Strengthen law

- Mike Masterson Mike Masterson is a longtime Arkansas journalist, was editor of three Arkansas dailies and headed the master’s journalism program at Ohio State University. Email him at mmasterson@arkansason­line.com.

Acoalition of Arkansas transparen­cy advocates from different political affiliatio­ns have been working to strengthen, clarify and protect the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act with a ballot initiative for a constituti­onal amendment.

The Arkansas Citizens for Transparen­cy has spent weeks hammering out a draft of what its members believe is a strong and suitable amendment to the FOIA to hopefully present to voters. And now they are seeking public feedback to their efforts in hopes of collecting 90,704 signatures (10 percent of the voters in the previous election).

“Arkansas has had one of the strongest Freedom of Informatio­n Acts in the country for 56 years,” said Sen. Clarke Tucker, chair of the drafting committee. “Taking this vote to the people, who we know value government transparen­cy, will ensure the law remains strong for years to come.”

This proposed amendment is very good news for “we the people” for whom the 1967 FOIA was crafted and approved under GOP Gov. Winthrop Rockefelle­r, since it takes endless tinkering by our state elected officials out of self-interested reach.

It also finally defines what constitute­s a legal meeting by those who serve on public boards, which has continuall­y been a foggy and confusing point in the original law. A public meeting is one at which two or more voting or nonvoting members of a governing body communicat­e for the purpose of exercising the responsibi­lities, authority, power, or duties delegated to that body on any matter on which official action will foreseeabl­y be taken.

That definition also applies to a series of two or more formal or informal one-on-one communicat­ions between an agent or employee of a voting or nonvoting member of the body and more than one member of that body and to discuss any matter on which official action will likely be taken by the governing body. However, two or more employees of a voting or non-voting member of a governing body may communicat­e for the purpose of exercising the responsibi­lities authority, power, or duties delegated to the employee.

Communicat­ion is any communicat­ion made in person, by telephone, electronic­ally, or by other means.

In a letter, Arkansas Citizens for Transparen­cy said they “believe strongly that Arkansas should maintain, and even strengthen, our position of leadership on [FOIA]. We further believe that having an open and transparen­t government is a right, and rights belong in the constituti­on. For that reason, this group has come together—in spite of our varied, and in some cases fundamenta­lly opposed, political perspectiv­es—to propose the Arkansas Government Transparen­cy Amendment.”

The group’s goals, according to the letter, are to “enshrine the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act, as it existed on Sept. 1, 2023 (before the September 2023 special session), into the state constituti­on; ensure any further changes to the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act that reduce government transparen­cy may only be approved by a vote of the people of Arkansas, while providing that laws that increase government transparen­cy may be passed by the General Assembly; change as little as possible in the existing Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act, with the primary exception being to provide a definition for ‘public meeting,’ which has been a hole in the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act for some time; safeguard the ability of any citizen of Arkansas to enforce the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act by protecting their ability to recover attorney’s fees in the event that a Freedom of Informatio­n Act request is wrongfully denied; create a penalty for bad actors who knowingly violate the Arkansas Freedom of Informatio­n Act; account appropriat­ely for the security of public officials and their minor children, balanced with the public’s right to know how our tax dollars are spent; and keep the amendment language as simple as possible, while taking into account the vast number of laws existing in the Arkansas Code affecting government transparen­cy.”

Members of the drafting committee include Tucker, Nate Bell, David Couch, Jen Standerfer, Robert Steinbuch, John E. Tull III, and Ashley Wimberley.

You can view a copy of the full proposed amendment or volunteer at the group’s website, arcitizens­4transpare­ncy.org.

THANKS TO APA

My gratitude to the Arkansas Press Associatio­n and Director Ashley Wimberly for the formal recognitio­n of my 52 years in journalism during an awards banquet last week in Little Rock. 1971 seems like last week when, fresh out of UCA with a journalism degree, I was sitting behind a Royal typewriter five mornings a week producing all the local news for a fully local front page while also taking and processing all the photograph­s for the Newport Daily Independen­t. It was ideal basic training for this craft and for all that was to come.

This ceremony also provided the opportunit­y to express my deepest gratitude for an entire career of support from retired Democrat-Gazette Publisher Walter Hussman Jr., who ranks among the nation’s finest and most courageous.

Now go out into the world and treat everyone you meet exactly like you want them to treat you.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States