Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

NCAA shifts focus during hearing

- RALPH D. RUSSO

NCAA President Charlie Baker told federal lawmakers Tuesday that for college sports to modernize, the athletes must remain students.

At a Senate hearing to discuss how athletes are compensate­d for their celebrity endorsemen­ts, Baker and other college sports leaders shifted the focus toward the looming possibilit­y of athletes being deemed employees of their schools — a developmen­t that would upend amateur athletics in multiple ways.

“To enable enhanced benefits while protecting programs from one-size-fitsall actions in the courts, we support codifying current regulatory guidance into law by granting student-athletes special status that would affirm they are not employees,” Baker said in his opening remarks.

Baker said athlete representa­tives from all three NCAA divisions have stated they do not want to be employees of their schools. He also warned that without congressio­nal action, Division II and III schools might abandon their athletic programs.

Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick said inaction by Congress would lead to a series of rulings that declare college athletes employee — think labor pacts, revenue sharing and benefits all potentiall­y in the mix — but without uniformity.

“We’ll have a patchwork of state legislatio­n that will also create difference­s which are unsustaina­ble,” he said. “That for me are the things that are most important to avoid.”

Also appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee were Big Ten Commission­er Tony Petitti; former Florida gymnast Trinity Thomas; Walker Jones, who runs the booster-funded collective that supports University of Mississipp­i athletes; St. Joseph’s Athletic Director Jill Bodenstein­er; and Ramogi Huma, a former UCLA football player and longtime advocate for college athletes.

It was the 10th hearing on college sports on Capitol Hill since 2020, but the first since Baker took over as NCAA president earlier this year.

The former governor of Massachuse­tts touted recent reforms by the NCAA, including more long-term health insurance for athletes, degree completion funds for up to 10 years and scholarshi­p protection­s.

He also told the committee the NCAA was moving forward with its own regulation­s for name, image and likeness compensati­on deals for athletes.

Baker, his predecesso­r, Mark Emmert and other college sports leaders have been lobbying Congress for help with a federal law to regulate NIL compensati­on since before the NCAA lifted its ban on NIL payments to athletes in 2021. Several bills have been introduced or made public, including a few bipartisan efforts in recent months, but nothing has gained traction despite what many have referred to as an untenable situation.

“Utah is offering everybody on the team a new truck,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “Between the [transfer] portal and NIL, college football is in absolute chaos.”

Meanwhile, new legal threats to the collegiate model have emerged. An antitrust case could force schools and conference­s that compete at the highest levels of the NCAA into profession­al sports-style revenue sharing of billions in media rights dollars with football and basketball players.

The NCAA is comprised of more 1,100 schools, serving hundreds of thousands of athletes.

Huma, who has been at the forefront of the push for college athletes to receive more benefits and protection­s, conceded that only major college football and basketball players should be considered for employment status.

The NCAA men’s Division I basketball tournament accounts for most of the associatio­n’s annual revenue, which surpassed $1 billion last year, and Power Five conference­s have multibilli­on-dollar television contracts worth billions with most of the value driven by football.

“People are discussing closing the door on employee status without paying the athletes fairly,” Huma said.

Petitti, who became Big Ten commission­er earlier this year after a long career as a television and Major League Baseball executive, said his schools are open to providing more benefits directly to athletes. The Big Ten signed media rights deals last year that will pay the conference more than $7 billion over the next seven years.

In written testimony, Swarbrick said Congress could consider a “more radical approach” and codify a system in which athletes could negotiate with conference­s over terms and conditions of athletic participat­ion.

“They want to know there’s an even playing field, we have to find a way to deliver that to them,” Swarbrick said during the hearing. “That can come either by empowering the NCAA in limited areas to enable competitiv­e equity or to develop a process by which we can agree with our student-athletes on what those rules and regulation­s should be.”

Bodenstein­er, the St. Joe’s AD, said the problems in college sports are impacting only a small part of the enterprise and mostly stem from major college football.

“The reality is at a Division I school like St. Joe’s, college athletics is actually working quite well,” she said.

Jones’ appearance was the first by someone representi­ng a NIL collective at a congressio­nal hearing on college sports. He said the booster-backed groups support federal legislatio­n that would pre-empt state NIL laws and that collective­s would like to be involved in the solution.

“I think if we’re doing our part, we can provide really transparen­t and tangible details to all the stakeholde­rs,” Jones said.

Baker said he was skeptical about collective­s helping with transparen­cy and Pettiti expressed concerns about their growing power.

“We are concerned that management of college athletics is shifting away from universiti­es to collective­s,” Petitti said.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) pushed back on some of the panicked rhetoric about the state of college sports and cautioned against too much government regulation.

“I’d be real careful about inviting Congress to micro-manage your business,” Kennedy told Baker.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States