Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Dispensary files lawsuit over Mississipp­i pot ad ban

- MICHAEL GOLDBERG Michael Goldberg is a corps member for the Associated Press/ Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.

JACKSON, Miss. — The owner of a Mississipp­i medical marijuana dispensary filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday challengin­g state regulation­s that he says censor business owners by preventing them from advertisin­g.

After Mississipp­i legalized medical marijuana for people with debilitati­ng conditions in 2022, Clarence Cocroft II opened Tru Source Medical Cannabis in Olive Branch, Miss. But he said he has struggled to reach customers because Mississipp­i’s Department of Health has banned medical marijuana businesses from advertisin­g in any media.

That violates business owners’ First Amendment rights, Cocroft’s attorneys wrote in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississipp­i.

“All I want to do, like any other business owner, is have the opportunit­y to advertise. If I pay taxes in this business, which I do, I should be able to advertise,” Cocroft said at a news conference. “All I’m asking from this state is to provide us with the same liberty that they’ve provided other businesses.”

Cocroft, who is represente­d by the Institute for Justice, sued the leaders of the state’s Department of Health, Department of Revenue and Alcoholic Beverage Control Bureau. The lawsuit accuses state regulation­s of prohibitin­g business owners from engaging in truthful commercial speech to promote their legal businesses, which the plaintiff argues violates the First Amendment.

“Under the ban, Clarence can’t advertise in any media. He cannot place ads in newspapers or magazines, on television or radio, or even on billboards that he already owns,” said Katrin Marquez, one of Cocroft’s attorneys. “The First Amendment does not allow a state to completely censor a legal business. If it is legal to sell a product, it is legal to talk about that product.”

Spokespeop­le for the Mississipp­i Department of Health and Department of Revenue did not immediatel­y respond to emails requesting comment Tuesday.

Arkansas, Louisiana and Alabama also have regulation­s that prohibit dispensari­es from advertisin­g through public mediums. But Cocroft’s attorneys said Mississipp­i’s regulation­s are more stringent than those in neighborin­g states.

Mississipp­i law allows patients to buy up to to 3.5 grams of cannabis per day, up to six days a week.

The state Health Department cannot prevent dispensari­es from placing “appropriat­e signs” on their properties or displaying products they sell on their websites. All other advertisin­g restrictio­ns are up to the Health Department, which prohibits dispensari­es from advertisin­g or marketing “in any media.”

“The state government cannot simultaneo­usly authorize the legal sale of a product or service, while forbidding the truthful advertisin­g of said product,” Marquez said. “No law, state or federal, justifies the censorship in this case.”

When Cocroft started Tru Source, he says he budgeted for advertisin­g and purchased a few billboards in highly trafficked areas in northern Mississipp­i. He has been leasing the billboards to other businesses and relied instead on word-of-mouth recommenda­tions to reach potential customers.

“It’s simply unfair that every other legal business in Mississipp­i is allowed to advertise, while I have to rely on word of mouth,” Cocroft said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States