Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Changes to Puerto Rico deal redacted

Details demanded on coal-fired plant

- DÁNICA COTO

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — A proposed amended contract between Puerto Rico’s government and the operator of a coal-fired power plant accused of contaminat­ing low-income communitie­s on the island drew scrutiny Monday during a public hearing.

Environmen­talists and lawyers demanded to see the redacted details of the proposed amendments sought by AES Puerto Rico LP as they accused officials during the hearing held by Puerto Rico’s Energy Bureau of withholdin­g key informatio­n that would affect those living in the U.S. territory.

“It can say anything under those blackouts,” said Víctor Alvarado, environmen­tal affairs secretary for the Puerto Rican Independen­ce Party.

“This is like a blank check,” added Myrna Conty Hernández, an environmen­talist and community leader.

If approved, the amended contract would go into effect Friday . It is expected to lead to an increase in power bills that are already among the highest of any U.S. jurisdicti­on and to award more money to a company that has come under the scrutiny of the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency. The EPA is testing air and water in the region.

The Energy Bureau is expected to issue a decision in the coming days. A bureau spokespers­on said it does not comment on cases that are under review.

An AES spokespers­on did not immediatel­y return a message seeking comment.

The amended contract already was approved by the governing board of Puerto Rico’s Electric Power Authority, which said the details are confidenti­al because the contract still had to be approved by the Energy Bureau and a federal control board that oversees the island’s finances.

Puerto Rico’s power company has said that AES is facing “severe” financial issues and warned that if the company ceases to operate, the island’s already crumbling electric grid would be further destabiliz­ed, and power bills would spike.

AES produces about one-quarter of Puerto Rico’s power via its coal-fired power plant in the southeast coastal town of Guayama.

Medical doctors have testified in public hearings that they have seen a “significan­t” increase in various types of cancers and other diseases in that region since the plant began operating.

“Approving this contract is mocking the victims,” said José Santos, with a local religious group. “Who is helping the citizens?”

The contract dating from 1994 has been amended twice. Among the new proposed amendments are details of a “green transition stabilizat­ion payment” and a plan to convert the Guayama coal plant to green energy, including the location of such projects. Such details have been redacted.

Attorney Ruth Santiago stressed that residents have a right to more informatio­n since public funds are involved. She told Monday’s hearing that unrelated largescale solar projects have led to an increase in flooding in some Puerto Rico communitie­s and were built on agricultur­al land.

“These are issues that are going to affect them,” she said. “Instead of comments, we have questions.”

The contract calls for the closure of the coal generation plant by December 2027 as the island seeks to lessen its dependence on petroleum and transition to clean energy. Petroleum accounts for more than half of the island’s total energy use, according to the U.S. Energy Informatio­n Administra­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States