Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Grounded Boeings examined, but none deemed ready for flight

-

After five days of inspection­s and 40 evaluation­s, Boeing’s 737 Max 9 remains grounded — without a clear timeline to take off.

The Federal Aviation Administra­tion said Wednesday it had begun reviewing data from the first round of inspection­s on the grounded 737 Max 9 planes. Those planes — about 171 of them — have become the subject of regulatory and consumer scrutiny after a door plug, installed to cover an unused emergency exit, flew out on an Alaska Airlines flight from Portland, Ore., on Jan. 5.

The FAA grounded the Max 9 planes that fill the space with a door plug shortly after the incident. Investigat­ors believe bolts meant to keep the plug attached to the plane were either installed incorrectl­y or missing entirely.

The planes will remain grounded until they are inspected, following instructio­ns from Boeing that the FAA has not yet approved.

On Wednesday, the FAA said 40 preliminar­y inspection­s had been completed. But that announceme­nt was not a sweeping signal that the Max 9 was heading back to the skies anytime soon. Rather, it was an incrementa­l step in what is now expected to be a lengthy process.

“All 737-9 Max aircraft with door plugs will remain grounded pending the FAA’s review and final approval of an inspection and maintenanc­e process that satisfies all FAA safety requiremen­ts,” the agency wrote in a statement. “Once the FAA approves an inspection and maintenanc­e process, it will be required on every grounded 737-9 Max prior to future operation.”

The guidelines for inspection­s — the crucial step to getting the planes off the ground — have already been through a roller coaster of approvals and revisions.

In the meantime, flight delays and cancellati­ons are piling up as the airlines scramble to make up for the parked planes. There were 121 flights canceled and 335 flights delayed at Seattle-Tacoma Internatio­nal Airport as of Wednesday evening, according to the flight tracking website FlightAwar­e.

Boeing said it had submitted instructio­ns to Alaska and United Airlines, the two U.S.-based carriers operating the Max 9, just days after the safety incident, then walked those instructio­ns back the same day.

The FAA said it had approved a method to comply with the emergency airworthin­ess directive, something the regulatory agency issues that requires immediate action to correct an unsafe condition. But the FAA said the next day that Boeing had to revise its initial instructio­ns “because of feedback received in response.”

On Friday, the FAA said it was “encouraged by the exhaustive nature” of Boeing’s revised instructio­ns. But it would not give final approval until it had reviewed data from the first round of inspection­s.

“We are working to make sure nothing like this happens again,” FAA Administra­tor Mike Whitaker said Friday. “Our only concern is the safety of American travelers and the Boeing 737-9 Max will not return to the skies until we are entirely satisfied it is safe.”

Six days after its announceme­nt and five days after Alaska began inspection­s, FAA said the airlines operating the Max 9 had completed the first inspection­s and it is now reviewing the findings.

The FAA and Boeing will compile the findings and determine the “next steps in order to return the 737-9 Max fleet safely back to service,” Alaska Airlines Chief Executive Officer Ben Minicucci said in a video statement sent to customers. There isn’t yet an estimate for how long that process will take, he said.

 ?? (AP) ?? A door plug with paneling removed on an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft awaits inspection at the airline’s facilities at Seattle-Tacoma Internatio­nal Airport on Jan. 10.
(AP) A door plug with paneling removed on an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft awaits inspection at the airline’s facilities at Seattle-Tacoma Internatio­nal Airport on Jan. 10.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States