Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Vibecessio­n coming to an end?

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics, writes for the New York Times.

In 2022, Republican­s seemed to have an easy path to regaining the White House; no actual policy proposals required. All they had to do was contrast Donald Trump’s economic record—which they portrayed as stellar—with the lousy economy under President Joe Biden.

That rosy view of the Trump economy involved a lot of selective forgetting; more about that in a minute. But the Biden economy was indeed troubled for much of 2022, with the highest inflation in 40 years. Jobs were plentiful, with unemployme­nt near a 50-year low, but many economists were predicting an imminent recession.

Since then, however, two terrible things have happened—terrible from the point of view of Republican partisans.

First, the economy has healed: Inflation has plunged without any major rise in unemployme­nt. Second, Americans finally seem to be noticing the good news.

Before I get to that, let’s talk about Biden’s predecesso­r. How can people claim that Trump presided over a great economy when he was the first president since Herbert Hoover to leave the White House with fewer Americans employed than when he arrived?

The answer is that Trumpists want us to give him a mulligan for 2020 when the economy was devastated by covid-19. Strangely, though, they don’t want to give Biden a similar mulligan for 2021-22, when lingering disruption­s from the pandemic played a large role in inflation. (Those disruption­s finally eased in 2023, leading to last year’s “immaculate disinflati­on.”)

Yet Trumpists don’t want to forget 2020 entirely. They still talk about how gasoline cost less than $2 a gallon, which was true for only two months in 2020—months when the unemployme­nt rate was more than 13 percent. Funny how that works.

But back to the Biden economy, real and perceived.

Inflation has come down really fast over the past year. For technical reasons related to the way it treats housing, the consumer price index is a lagging indicator; other measures suggest that we’re already close to the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate of 2 percent. And this plunge in inflation has taken place without any big rise in unemployme­nt, which has been under 4 percent for almost two years.

The economy remains riddled with inequality and injustice. But it’s looking a lot better, with real wages rising and inequality falling.

Until recently, however, Republican­s could take comfort in the fact that the most widely cited indicator of consumer sentiment, from the University of Michigan, remained stuck at levels that in the past were associated with high unemployme­nt, inflation or both. Other indicators showed some improvemen­t but were still depressed.

Oddly, surveys have consistent­ly shown most Americans feeling pretty good about their own financial situation. But they insisted that bad things were happening to the economy—to other people. Commentato­r Kyla Scanlon coined the term “vibecessio­n,” now widely used to mean a situation in which negative views about the economy don’t seem to match up with the data.

But the vibecessio­n may be coming to an end. The Michigan index has soared over the past two months, while expected inflation has plunged. Suddenly, Americans are sounding more positive about the economy.

It’s true that overall consumer sentiment still looks weaker than it did in late 2019, when both unemployme­nt and inflation were similar to their current levels. But much, maybe most, of this gap reflects partisansh­ip. Supporters of both parties tend to have negative economic views when the other party holds the White House, but the effect is much stronger for Republican­s.

According to the Michigan survey, Republican­s on average consider current economic conditions roughly as bad now as they were in June 1980, when inflation was more than 14 percent and unemployme­nt was more than 7 percent.

From a political point of view, this means overall consumer sentiment is being held down largely by people who would never consider voting for Biden in any case. What matters are the perception­s of persuadabl­e voters and Democrats who might have stayed home in the face of a bad economy. And these perception­s are almost surely moving in Biden’s direction.

If the vibecessio­n is ending, why? One answer is that good news takes time to filter into public perception­s. Even some profession­al economists haven’t caught up and are still talking about stubbornly high inflation; we shouldn’t expect everyday people’s perception­s to turn on a dime.

Beyond that, I suspect that economic perception­s are being influenced by the stock market, which has recently reached record highs. The truth is that the market is a very bad guide to the economy’s future, but it’s highly visible. Furthermor­e, it influences the tone of news coverage of the economy, which has been very negative under Biden but may be improving.

Will economic perception­s actually end up being a plus for Biden? Probably not. But if Trump was counting on perception­s of a bad economy to hand him victory, reality seems disincline­d to cooperate.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States